PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT NO. 11 |
Filed Pursuant to Rule 424(b)(3) |
(to prospectus dated March 19, 2021) |
Registration No. 333-251034 |
PURECYCLE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
25,000,000 Shares
Common Stock
This prospectus supplement is being filed to update
and supplement the information contained in the prospectus dated March 19, 2021 (as supplemented or amended from time to time, the “Prospectus”),
with the information contained in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, which was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”)
on August 12, 2021 (the “Quarterly Report”). Accordingly, we have attached the Quarterly Report to this prospectus supplement.
The Prospectus and this prospectus supplement relate
to the resale from time to time of up to 25,000,000 shares of our common stock, par value $0.001 per share (“Common Stock”),
issued pursuant to the terms of those certain subscription agreements entered into (the “PIPE Investment”) in connection with
the Business Combination (as defined in the Prospectus). As described in the Prospectus, the selling securityholders named therein or
their permitted transferees (collectively, the “Selling Stockholders”), may sell from time to time up to 25,000,000 shares
of our Common Stock that were issued to the Selling Stockholders in connection with the closing of the PIPE Investment and the Business
Combination.
This prospectus supplement updates and supplements
the information in the Prospectus and is not complete without, and may not be delivered or utilized except in combination with, the Prospectus,
including any amendments or supplements thereto. This prospectus supplement should be read in conjunction with the Prospectus and if there
is any inconsistency between the information in the Prospectus and this prospectus supplement, you should rely on the information in this
prospectus supplement.
Our Common Stock, warrants and units are listed
on The Nasdaq Capital Market under the symbols “PCT,” “PCTTW” and “PCTTU,” respectively. On August
12, 2021, the closing price of our Common Stock was $15.94 per share.
Investing in our securities involves risks that
are described in the “Risk Factors” section beginning on page 23 of the Prospectus.
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission
nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved of these securities or determined if the Prospectus or this prospectus
supplement is truthful or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.
The date of this prospectus supplement is August
13, 2021.
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
|
|
|
☒ |
QUARTERLY
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For
the quarterly period ended June
30, 2021
OR
|
|
|
|
|
|
☐ |
TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For
transition period from to
Commission
File Number 001-40234
PureCycle
Technologies, Inc.
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State |
|
86-2293091 |
Delaware |
|
(I.R.S.
Employer
Identification
Number) |
5950
Hazeltine National Drive, Suite
650
Orlando,
Florida
32822
(877)
648-3565
(Address,
including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of registrant’s principal executive offices)
Securities
registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title
of each class |
|
Trading
Symbols |
|
Name
of each exchange on which registered |
Common
Stock, par value $0.001 per share |
|
PCT |
|
The
Nasdaq Stock Market LLC |
Warrants,
each exercisable for one share of common stock, $0.001 par value, at an exercise price of $11.50 per share |
|
PCTTW |
|
The
Nasdaq Stock Market LLC |
Units,
each consisting of one share of common stock, $0.001 par value, and three quarters of one warrant |
|
PCTTU |
|
The
Nasdaq Stock Market LLC |
Indicate
by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2)
has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes
☒ No ☐
Indicate
by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule
405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was
required to submit such files). Yes
☒ No ☐
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting
company or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,”
“smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large
accelerated filer |
☐ |
Accelerated
filer |
☐ |
Non-accelerated
filer |
☒ |
Smaller
reporting company |
☒ |
|
|
Emerging
growth company |
☒ |
If
an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying
with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 7(a)(2)(B) of the Securities Act. ☐
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act): Yes ☐
No ☒
As
of August 12, 2021, there were approximately 117,356,725
shares of the registrant's common stock outstanding, par value $0.001 per share, outstanding.
PureCycle
Technologies, Inc.
QUARTERLY
REPORT on FORM 10-Q
TABLE
OF CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page |
PART I - Financial Information |
|
|
|
Item
1. Financial Statements |
|
|
|
Unaudited
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
as of June 30, 2021
and December 31, 2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PureCycle
Technologies, Inc.
PART
I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION (CONTINUED)
CAUTIONARY
STATEMENT ON FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities
Act”), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), including statements
about the outcome of any legal proceedings to which PCT is, or may become a party, and the financial condition, results of operations,
earnings outlook and prospects of PCT. Forward-looking statements generally relate to future events or PCT’s future financial or
operating performance and may refer to projections and forecasts. Forward-looking statements are typically identified by words such as
“plan,” “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “outlook,”
“estimate,” “forecast,” “project,” “continue,” “could,” “may,”
“might,” “possible,” “potential,” “predict,” “should,” “would”
and other similar words and expressions (or the negative versions of such words or expressions), but the absence of these words does not
mean that a statement is not forward-looking.
The forward-looking statements
are based on the current expectations of the management of PCT and are inherently subject to uncertainties and changes in circumstances
and their potential effects and speak only as of the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. There can be no assurance that future
developments will be those that have been anticipated. These forward-looking statements involve a number of risks, uncertainties or other
assumptions that may cause actual results or performance to be materially different from those expressed or implied by these forward-looking
statements. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, those factors described in the section of this Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q entitled “Risk Factors,” those discussed and identified in public filings made with the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission (the “SEC”) by PCT and the following:
• PCT's
ability to meet, and to continue to meet, applicable regulatory requirements for the use of PCT’s UPRP (as defined below) in food
grade applications (both in the United States and abroad);
• PCT's
ability to comply on an ongoing basis with the numerous regulatory requirements applicable to the UPRP and PCT’s facilities (both
in the United States and abroad);
• Expectations
and changes regarding PCT’s strategies and future financial performance, including its future business plans, expansion plans or
objectives, prospective performance and opportunities and competitors, revenues, products and services, pricing, operating expenses, market
trends, liquidity, cash flows and uses of cash, capital expenditures, and PCT’s ability to invest in growth initiatives;
• PCT’s
ability to scale and build the Ironton plant in a timely and cost-effective manner;
• PCT’s
ability to build its first U.S. cluster facility, located in Augusta, Georgia (the “Augusta Facility”), in a timely and cost-effective
manner.
• PCT’s
ability to maintain exclusivity under the P&G license (as described below);
• the
implementation, market acceptance and success of PCT’s business model and growth strategy;
• the
success or profitability of PCT’s offtake arrangements;
• the
ability to source feedstock with a high polypropylene content;
• PCT’s
future capital requirements and sources and uses of cash;
• PCT’s
ability to obtain funding for its operations and future growth;
• developments
and projections relating to PCT’s competitors and industry;
• the
outcome of any legal proceedings to which PCT is, or may become, a party including recently filed
PureCycle
Technologies, Inc.
PART
I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION (CONTINUED)
securities class action
cases;
• the
ability to recognize the anticipated benefits of the Business Combination;
• unexpected
costs related to the Business Combination;
• geopolitical
risk and changes in applicable laws or regulations;
• the
possibility that PCT may be adversely affected by other economic, business, and/or competitive factors;
• operational
risk; and
• the
risk that the COVID-19 pandemic, including any variants and the efficacy and distribution of vaccines, and local, state, federal and international
responses to addressing the pandemic may have an adverse effect on PCT’s business operations, as well as PCT’s financial condition
and results of operations.
We undertake no obligation
to update any forward-looking statements made in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q to reflect events or circumstances after the date
of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q or to reflect new information or the occurrence of unanticipated events, except as required by law.
Should one or more of
these risks or uncertainties materialize or should any of the assumptions made prove incorrect, actual results may vary in material respects
from those projected in these forward-looking statements. You should not rely upon forward-looking statements as predictions of future
events.
PureCycle
Technologies, Inc.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
(in
thousands except per share data) |
June
30, 2021 |
|
December
31, 2020 |
CURRENT
ASSETS |
|
|
|
Cash |
$ |
37,703 |
|
|
$ |
64,492 |
|
Debt
securities available for sale |
200,432 |
|
|
— |
|
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets |
3,345 |
|
|
446 |
|
Total
current assets |
241,480 |
|
|
64,938 |
|
Restricted
cash |
300,871 |
|
|
266,082 |
|
Prepaid
royalties and licenses |
4,375 |
|
|
2,890 |
|
Property,
plant and equipment, net |
138,411 |
|
|
70,218 |
|
TOTAL
ASSETS |
$ |
685,137 |
|
|
$ |
404,128 |
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
CURRENT
LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
Accounts
payable |
$ |
601 |
|
|
$ |
1,058 |
|
Accrued
expenses |
40,266 |
|
|
26,944 |
|
Accrued
interest |
2,297 |
|
|
4,951 |
|
Notes
payable – current |
36 |
|
|
122 |
|
Total
current liabilities |
43,200 |
|
|
33,075 |
|
NON-CURRENT
LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
Deferred
research and development obligation |
1,000 |
|
|
1,000 |
|
Deferred
revenue |
5,000 |
|
|
— |
|
Notes
payable |
59,203 |
|
|
26,477 |
|
Bonds
payable |
232,037 |
|
|
235,676 |
|
Warrant
liability |
17,899 |
|
|
— |
|
TOTAL
LIABILITIES |
$ |
358,339 |
|
|
$ |
296,228 |
|
|
|
|
|
COMMITMENT
AND CONTINGENCIES |
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS'
EQUITY |
|
|
|
Common
shares - $0.001
par value, 250,000
shares authorized; 117,339
and 0
shares issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020 |
117 |
|
|
— |
|
Class
A Units - no
par value; 0
and 3,981
units authorized; 0
and 3,612
units issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020 |
— |
|
|
38 |
|
Class
B Preferred Units - no
par value; 0
and 1,938
units authorized; 0
and 1,938
units issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020 |
— |
|
|
21 |
|
Class
B-1 Preferred Units - no
par value; 0
and 1,146
units authorized, 0
and 1,105
units issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020 |
— |
|
|
16 |
|
PureCycle
Technologies, Inc.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class
C Units – no
par value; 0
and 1,069
units authorized, 0
and 865
units issued and 0
and 775
units outstanding as of June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020 |
— |
|
|
7 |
|
Additional
paid-in capital |
456,310 |
|
|
192,381 |
|
Accumulated
other comprehensive loss |
(106) |
|
|
— |
|
Accumulated
deficit |
(129,523) |
|
|
(84,563) |
|
TOTAL
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY |
326,798 |
|
|
107,900 |
|
TOTAL
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY |
$ |
685,137 |
|
|
$ |
404,128 |
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
PureCycle
Technologies, Inc.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three
months ended June 30, |
|
Six
months ended June 30, |
|
2021 |
|
2020 |
|
2021 |
|
2020 |
(in
thousands except per share data) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs
and expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
costs |
$ |
2,411 |
|
|
$ |
1,793 |
|
|
$ |
4,541 |
|
|
$ |
3,476 |
|
Research
and development |
224 |
|
|
9 |
|
|
771 |
|
|
357 |
|
Selling,
general and administrative |
7,259 |
|
|
1,048 |
|
|
14,883 |
|
|
2,286 |
|
Total
operating costs and expenses |
9,894 |
|
|
2,850 |
|
|
20,195 |
|
|
6,119 |
|
Interest
expense |
6,054 |
|
|
597 |
|
|
12,143 |
|
|
1,185 |
|
Change
in fair value of warrants |
(359) |
|
|
1,120 |
|
|
13,262 |
|
|
1,775 |
|
Other
expense |
(312) |
|
|
(152) |
|
|
(203) |
|
|
(100) |
|
Total
other expense |
5,383 |
|
|
1,565 |
|
|
25,202 |
|
|
2,860 |
|
Net
loss |
$ |
(15,277) |
|
|
$ |
(4,415) |
|
|
$ |
(45,397) |
|
|
$ |
(8,979) |
|
Loss
per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
and diluted |
$ |
(0.13) |
|
|
$ |
(0.19) |
|
|
$ |
(0.54) |
|
|
$ |
(0.48) |
|
Weighted
average common shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
and diluted |
117,346 |
|
|
27,156 |
|
|
84,284 |
|
|
27,156 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
comprehensive loss: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
loss on debt securities available for sale |
$ |
(106) |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
(106) |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
Total
comprehensive loss |
$ |
(15,383) |
|
|
$ |
(4,415) |
|
|
$ |
(45,503) |
|
|
$ |
(8,979) |
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
PureCycle
Technologies, Inc.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For
the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2021 |
|
Common
stock |
|
Class
A |
|
Class
B Preferred |
|
Class
B-1 Preferred |
|
Class
C |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in
thousands) |
Shares |
|
Amount |
|
Units |
|
Amount |
|
Units |
|
Amount |
|
Units |
|
Amount |
|
Units |
|
Amount |
|
Additional
paid-in capital |
|
Accumulated
other comprehensive loss |
|
Accumulated
deficit |
|
Total
stockholders' equity |
Balance,
December 31, 2020 |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
3,612 |
|
|
$ |
88,081 |
|
|
1,938 |
|
|
$ |
20,071 |
|
|
1,105 |
|
|
$ |
41,162 |
|
|
775 |
|
|
$ |
11,967 |
|
|
$ |
31,182 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
(84,563) |
|
|
$ |
107,900 |
|
Conversion
of stock |
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
34,386 |
|
|
(88,043) |
|
|
18,690 |
|
|
(20,050) |
|
|
15,217 |
|
|
(41,146) |
|
|
5,936 |
|
|
(11,960) |
|
|
161,199 |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
Balance
at December 31, 2020, effect of reverse recapitalization conversion |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
37,998 |
|
|
$ |
38 |
|
|
20,628 |
|
|
$ |
21 |
|
|
16,322 |
|
|
$ |
16 |
|
|
6,711 |
|
|
$ |
7 |
|
|
$ |
192,381 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
(84,563) |
|
|
$ |
107,900 |
|
Issuance
of units upon vesting of Legacy PCT profits interests |
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
116 |
|
|
— |
|
|
239 |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
239 |
|
Redemption
of vested profit units |
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
(5) |
|
|
— |
|
|
(36) |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
(36) |
|
Removal
of beneficial conversion feature upon adoption of ASU 2020-06 |
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
(31,075) |
|
|
— |
|
|
437 |
|
|
(30,638) |
|
Merger
Recapitalization |
81,754 |
|
|
82 |
|
|
(37,998) |
|
|
(38) |
|
|
(20,628) |
|
|
(21) |
|
|
(16,322) |
|
|
(16) |
|
|
(6,822) |
|
|
(7) |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
ROCH Shares Recapitalized,
Net of Redemptions, Warrant Liability and Issuance Costs of $27.9
million |
34,823 |
|
|
35 |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
293,931 |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
293,966 |
|
Issuance
of restricted stock awards |
775 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
(1) |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
Forfeiture
of restricted stock |
(3) |
|
|
(1) |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
1 |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
Reclassification
of redeemable warrant to liability |
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
(33) |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
(33) |
|
Equity
based compensation |
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
68 |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
68 |
|
Net
loss |
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
(30,120) |
|
|
(30,120) |
|
Balance,
March 31, 2021 |
117,349 |
|
|
$ |
117 |
|
|
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
455,475 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
(114,246) |
|
|
$ |
341,346 |
|
Forfeiture
of restricted stock |
(10) |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
Equity
based compensation |
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
835 |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
835 |
|
Unrealized
loss on available for sale debt securities |
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
(106) |
|
|
— |
|
|
(106) |
|
Net
loss |
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
(15,277) |
|
|
(15,277) |
|
Balance,
June 30, 2021 |
117,339 |
|
|
$ |
117 |
|
|
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
456,310 |
|
|
$ |
(106) |
|
|
$ |
(129,523) |
|
|
$ |
326,798 |
|
PureCycle
Technologies, Inc.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For
the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2020 |
|
Common
stock |
|
Class
A |
|
Class
B Preferred |
|
Class
B-1 Preferred |
|
Class
C |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in
thousands) |
Shares |
|
Amount |
|
Units |
|
Amount |
|
Units |
|
Amount |
|
Units |
|
Amount |
|
Units |
|
Amount |
|
Additional
paid-in capital |
|
Accumulated
other comprehensive loss |
|
Accumulated
deficit |
|
Total
stockholders' equity |
Balance,
December 31, 2019 |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
2,581 |
|
|
$ |
387 |
|
|
1,728 |
|
|
$ |
1,898 |
|
|
630 |
|
|
$ |
23,656 |
|
|
436 |
|
|
$ |
4,054 |
|
|
$ |
107 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
(27,722) |
|
|
$ |
2,380 |
|
Conversion
of stock |
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
24,575 |
|
|
(360) |
|
|
16,660 |
|
|
(1,880) |
|
|
8,670 |
|
|
(23,647) |
|
|
3,625 |
|
|
(4,050) |
|
|
29,937 |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
Balance
at December 31, 2019, effect of reverse recapitalization conversion |
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
27,156 |
|
|
$ |
27 |
|
|
18,388 |
|
|
$ |
18 |
|
|
9,300 |
|
|
$ |
9 |
|
|
4,061 |
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
30,044 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
(27,722) |
|
|
$ |
2,380 |
|
Issuance
of units |
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
4,578 |
|
|
5 |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
11,569 |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
11,574 |
|
Issuance
of units upon vesting of Legacy PCT profits interests |
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
362 |
|
|
— |
|
|
417 |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
417 |
|
Net
loss |
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
(4,564) |
|
|
(4,564) |
|
Balance,
March 31, 2020 |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
27,156 |
|
|
$ |
27 |
|
|
18,388 |
|
|
$ |
18 |
|
|
13,878 |
|
|
$ |
14 |
|
|
4,423 |
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
42,030 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
(32,286) |
|
|
$ |
9,807 |
|
Issuance
of units |
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
393 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
920 |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
920 |
|
Issuance
of units upon vesting of Legacy PCT profits interests |
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
147 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
172 |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
173 |
|
Net
loss |
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
(4,415) |
|
|
(4,415) |
|
Balance,
June 30, 2020 |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
27,156 |
|
|
$ |
27 |
|
|
18,388 |
|
|
$ |
18 |
|
|
14,271 |
|
|
$ |
14 |
|
|
4,570 |
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
$ |
43,122 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
(36,701) |
|
|
$ |
6,485 |
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
PureCycle
Technologies, Inc.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six
months ended June 30, |
(in
thousands) |
2021 |
|
2020 |
Cash
flows from operating activities |
|
|
|
Net
loss |
$ |
(45,397) |
|
|
$ |
(8,979) |
|
Adjustments
to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities |
|
|
|
Equity-based
compensation |
1,142 |
|
|
590 |
|
Fair
value change of warrants |
13,262 |
|
|
1,775 |
|
Depreciation
expense |
985 |
|
|
934 |
|
Accretion
of debt instrument discounts |
112 |
|
|
— |
|
Amortization
of debt issuance costs |
1,396 |
|
|
— |
|
Issuance
costs attributable to warrants |
109 |
|
|
— |
|
Amortization
of premium on debt securities |
165 |
|
|
— |
|
Gain
on extinguishment of secured term loan |
(314) |
|
|
— |
|
Changes
in operating assets and liabilities |
|
|
|
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets |
(2,899) |
|
|
(22) |
|
Prepaid
royalties and licenses |
(1,485) |
|
|
(40) |
|
Accounts
payable |
(725) |
|
|
(1,187) |
|
Accrued
expenses |
(13,082) |
|
|
476 |
|
Accrued
interest |
(1,251) |
|
|
(737) |
|
Deferred
revenue |
5,000 |
|
|
— |
|
Net
cash used in operating activities |
$ |
(42,982) |
|
|
$ |
(7,190) |
|
Cash
flows from investing activities |
|
|
|
Construction
of plant |
(42,229) |
|
|
(1,557) |
|
Purchase
of debt securities, available for sale |
(200,703) |
|
|
— |
|
Net
cash used in investing activities |
$ |
(242,932) |
|
|
$ |
(1,557) |
|
Cash
flows from financing activities |
|
|
|
Proceeds
from secured term loan |
— |
|
|
314 |
|
Proceeds
from promissory note |
91 |
|
|
— |
|
Payments
on promissory note from related parties |
— |
|
|
(600) |
|
Payments
on advances from related parties |
— |
|
|
(2,333) |
|
Payments
on promissory notes |
(55) |
|
|
— |
|
Proceeds
from ROCH and PIPE financing, net of issuance costs |
298,461 |
|
|
— |
|
Convertible
notes issuance costs |
(480) |
|
|
— |
|
Bond
issuance costs |
(4,067) |
|
|
— |
|
Proceeds
from issuance of units |
— |
|
|
12,493 |
|
Payments
on redemption of vested Legacy PCT profit interests |
(36) |
|
|
— |
|
Net
cash provided by financing activities |
$ |
293,914 |
|
|
$ |
9,874 |
|
Net
increase in cash and restricted cash |
8,000 |
|
|
1,127 |
|
Cash
and restricted cash, beginning of period |
330,574 |
|
|
150 |
|
Cash
and restricted cash, end of period |
$ |
338,574 |
|
|
$ |
1,277 |
|
Supplemental
disclosure of cash flow information |
|
|
|
Non-cash
operating activities |
|
|
|
Interest
paid during the period, net of capitalized interest |
$ |
11,948 |
|
|
$ |
1,120 |
|
Non-cash
investing activities |
|
|
|
Additions
to property, plant, and equipment in accrued expenses |
$ |
26,404 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
Additions
to property, plant, and equipment in accounts payable |
$ |
268 |
|
|
$ |
1,062 |
|
Additions
to property, plant, and equipment in accrued interest |
$ |
277 |
|
|
$ |
30 |
|
PureCycle
Technologies, Inc.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash
financing activities |
|
|
|
Conversion
of accounts payable to promissory notes |
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
945 |
|
PIK
interest on convertible notes |
$ |
1,680 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
Initial
fair value of acquired warrant liability |
$ |
4,604 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
Capitalization
of bond issuance costs — additions to accrued expense |
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
1,418 |
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
@
PureCycle
Technologies, Inc.
NOTES
TO THE INTERIM CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – CONTINUED
(Unaudited)
NOTE
1 - ORGANIZATION
Formation
and Organization
PureCycle
Technologies, Inc. (“PureCycle,” “PCT” or the “Company”) is headquartered in Orlando, Florida, and
its planned principal operation is to conduct business as a plastics recycler using PureCycle’s patented recycling process. Developed
and licensed by The Procter & Gamble Company (“P&G”), the patented recycling process separates color, odor and other
contaminants from plastic waste feedstock to transform it into virgin-like resin. The Company is currently constructing its first planned
facility and conducting research and development activities to operationalize the licensed technology.
PureCycle
Technologies LLC was formed as a Delaware limited liability company on September 15, 2015 as Advanced Resin Technologies, LLC. In November
2016, Advanced Resin Technologies, LLC changed its name to PureCycle Technologies LLC.
Business
Combination
On
March 17, 2021, PureCycle consummated the previously announced business combination (“Business Combination”) by and among
Roth CH Acquisition I Co., a Delaware corporation (“ROCH”), Roth CH Acquisition I Co. Parent Corp., a Delaware corporation
and wholly owned direct subsidiary of ROCH (“ParentCo”), Roth CH Merger Sub LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and
wholly owned direct subsidiary of Parent Co, Roth CH Merger Sub Corp., a Delaware corporation and wholly owned direct subsidiary of ParentCo
and PureCycle Technologies LLC (“PCT LLC”) pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of November 16, 2020, as
amended from time to time (the “Merger Agreement”).
Upon
the completion of the Business Combination and the other transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement (the “Transactions”,
and such completion, the “Closing”), ROCH changed its name to PureCycle Technologies Holdings Corp. and became a wholly owned
direct subsidiary of ParentCo, PCT LLC became a wholly owned direct subsidiary of PureCycle Technologies Holdings Corp. and a wholly owned
indirect subsidiary of ParentCo, and ParentCo changed its name to PureCycle Technologies, Inc. The Company’s common stock, units
and warrants are now listed on the Nasdaq Capital Market (“NASDAQ”) under the symbols “PCT,” “PCTTU”
and “PCTTW,” respectively.
In
connection with the Business Combination, ROCH entered into subscription agreements with certain investors (the “PIPE Investors”),
whereby it issued 25.0 million
shares of common stock at $10.00
per share (the “PIPE Shares”) for an aggregate purchase price of $250.0 million
(the “PIPE Financing”), which closed simultaneously with the consummation of the Business Combination. Upon the Closing of
the Business Combination, the PIPE Investors were issued shares of the Company’s common stock.
Legacy
PCT unitholders will be issued up to 4.0 million
additional shares of the Company’s common stock if certain conditions are met (“the Earnout”). The Legacy PCT unitholders
will be entitled to 2.0 million
shares if after six
months after the Closing and prior to or as of the third anniversary of the Closing, the closing price of the common stock
is greater than or equal to $18.00
over any 20
trading days within any 30-trading
day period. The Legacy PCT unitholders will be entitled to 2.0 million
shares upon the commercial-scale plant in Ironton, Ohio (the “Phase II Facility”) becoming operational, as certified by Leidos
Engineering, LLC (“Leidos”), an independent engineering firm, in accordance with criteria established in agreements in connection
with construction of the plant.
In
connection with the Business Combination, the Company incurred direct and incremental costs of approximately $27.9 million
related to the equity issuance, consisting primarily of investment banking and other professional fees, which were recorded to additional
paid-in capital as a reduction of proceeds.
The
Company incurred approximately $5.2 million
of expenses primarily related to advisory, legal, and accounting fees in conjunction with the Business Combination. Of this, $3.2 million
was recorded in general and administrative expenses on the consolidated statement of comprehensive loss for the six months ended June
30, 2021.
Unless
the context otherwise requires, “Registrant,” “PureCycle,” “Company,” “PCT,” “we,”
“us,” and “our” refer to PureCycle Technologies, Inc., and its subsidiaries at and after the Closing and give
effect to the Closing. “Legacy
PureCycle
Technologies, Inc.
NOTES
TO THE INTERIM CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – CONTINUED
(Unaudited)
PCT”,
“ROCH” and “ParentCo” refer to PureCycle Technologies LLC, ROCH and ParentCo, respectively, prior to the Closing.
The
aggregate consideration for the Business Combination was $1,156.9 million,
payable in the form of shares of the ParentCo Common Stock and assumed indebtedness.
The
following summarizes the merger consideration (in thousands except per share information):
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
shares transferred |
83,500 |
|
Value
per share |
$ |
10.00 |
|
Total
Share Consideration |
$ |
835,000 |
|
Assumed
indebtedness |
|
Revenue
Bonds |
249,600 |
|
The
Convertible Notes |
60,000 |
|
Term
Loan |
314 |
|
Related
Party Promissory Note |
12,000 |
|
Total
merger consideration |
$ |
1,156,914 |
|
The
following table reconciles the elements of the Business Combination to the condensed consolidated statement of cash flows for the six
months ended June 30, 2021 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
- ROCH Trust and cash (net of redemptions) |
$ |
76,510 |
|
Cash
- PIPE |
250,000 |
|
Less
transaction costs |
(28,049) |
|
Net
Business Combination and PIPE financing |
$ |
298,461 |
|
In
addition to cash received by the Company at the Close of the Business Combination, the Company assumed a warrant liability from ROCH measured
at $4.6 million
at March 18, 2021.
Refer
to Note 6 – Warrants for further information.
Basis
of Presentation
The
accompanying condensed consolidated interim financial statements include the accounts of the Company. The condensed consolidated interim
financial statements are presented in U.S. Dollars. Certain information in footnote disclosures normally included in annual financial
statements was condensed or omitted for the interim periods presented in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) and accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S.
GAAP”). Intercompany balances and transactions were eliminated upon consolidation. These condensed consolidated interim financial
statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes of Legacy PCT for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2020 as filed on July 1, 2021 in our prospectus filed pursuant to Rule 424(b)(3) of the Securities Act. The
results of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2021 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the entire
year ending December 31, 2021. The accompanying condensed consolidated interim financial statements reflect all adjustments, consisting
of normal recurring adjustments, that are, in the opinion of management, necessary to present a fair statement of the results for the
interim periods presented.
Reclassifications
Certain
amounts in prior periods have been reclassified to conform with the report classifications of the six months ended June 30, 2021, noting
the Company has reflected the reverse recapitalization pursuant to the Business
PureCycle
Technologies, Inc.
NOTES
TO THE INTERIM CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – CONTINUED
(Unaudited)
Combination
for all periods presented within the unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets and statements of stockholders’ equity.
Reverse
Recapitalization
The
Business Combination was accounted for as a reverse recapitalization and ROCH was treated as the “acquired” company for accounting
purposes. The Business Combination was accounted for as the equivalent of Legacy PCT issuing stock for the net assets of ROCH, accompanied
by a recapitalization. Accordingly, all historical financial information presented in these condensed consolidated interim financial statements
represents the accounts of Legacy PCT “as if” Legacy PCT is the predecessor to the Company. The units and net loss per unit,
prior to the Business Combination, have been adjusted to share amounts reflecting the exchange ratio established in the Business Combination.
Potential
Impact of COVID-19 on the Company’s Business
With
the global spread of the COVID-19 pandemic and the local, state and federal responses to the pandemic applicable to the Company’s
corporate headquarters, its Ironton, Ohio plant operations, and employees and potentially the Augusta Facility, the Company has implemented
policies and procedures to continue its operations under minimum business operations guidelines. The extent to which the COVID-19 pandemic
and the restrictions resulting from the pandemic impact the Company’s business, financial condition or results of operations will
depend on future developments, which are highly uncertain and cannot be accurately predicted.
Liquidity
The
Company has sustained recurring losses and negative cash flows from operations since its inception. As reflected in the accompanying condensed
consolidated interim financial statements, the Company has not yet begun commercial operations and does not have any sources of revenue.
In prior periods, substantial doubt was raised about the ability of Legacy PCT to continue as a going concern. The Company believes that
the total capital raised through the Business Combination is sufficient to adequately fund its future obligations for at least one year
from the date the condensed consolidated interim financial statements are available to be issued. As of June 30, 2021, and December 31,
2020, the Company had an unrestricted cash balance of $37.7
million and $64.5
million, respectively, working capital of $198.3
million and $31.9
million, respectively, and an accumulated deficit of $129.5
million and $84.6
million, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020, the Company incurred a net loss of $45.4
million and $9.0
million, respectively.
Emerging
Growth Company
At
June 30, 2021, we qualified as an “emerging growth company,” as defined in Section 2(a) of the Securities Act, as modified
by the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012 (the “JOBS Act”), and we have taken and may take advantage of certain exemptions
from various reporting requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not emerging growth companies including, but
not limited to, not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in our periodic reports and proxy statements, and exemptions from the
requirements of holding a nonbinding advisory vote on executive compensation and shareholder approval of any golden parachute payments
not previously approved.
Section
102(b)(1) of the JOBS Act exempts emerging growth companies from being required to comply with new or revised financial accounting standards
until private companies are required to comply with the new or revised standards. The JOBS Act provides that an emerging growth company
can elect to opt out of the extended transition period and comply with the requirements that apply to non-emerging growth companies but
any such election to opt out is irrevocable. We have opted to take advantage of such extended transition period available to emerging
growth companies which means that when a standard is issued or revised and it has different application dates for public or private companies,
we can adopt the new or revised standard at the time private companies adopt the new or revised standard.
PureCycle
Technologies, Inc.
NOTES
TO THE INTERIM CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – CONTINUED
(Unaudited)
NOTE
2 - SUMMARY
OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Cash
and cash equivalents
The
Company considers all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less at date of inception to be cash and
cash equivalents. As of June 30, 2021, the Company’s cash and cash equivalents balance represents cash and money market funds
deposited with financial institutions, as well as commercial paper with maturities of 90 days or less at acquisition. As of December 31,
2020, the Company’s cash and cash equivalents balance represents cash deposited with financial institutions. These balances may
exceed federally insured limits; however, the Company believes the risk of loss is low.
Investments
The Company accounts for
its investment in Debt Securities in accordance with ASC 320, Investments
– Debt Securities.
The fair value for fixed-rate debt securities is based on quoted market prices for the same or similar debt instruments and is classified
as Level 2. All investment holdings as of June 30, 2021 have been classified as Available for Sale. The Company did not hold any
investments in Debt Securities as of December 31, 2020. The Company classifies its Debt Securities investments as current assets
as they are highly liquid and the related funds are available for use in current operations.
Income
Taxes
To
calculate the interim tax provision, at the end of each interim period the Company estimates the annual effective tax rate and applies
that to its ordinary quarterly earnings. The effect of changes in the enacted tax laws or rates is recognized in the interim period in
which the change occurs. The computation of the annual estimated effective tax rate at each interim period requires certain estimates
and judgments including, but not limited to, the expected operating income for the year, projections of the proportion of income earned
and taxed in other jurisdictions, permanent differences between book and tax amounts, and the likelihood of recovering deferred tax assets
generated in the current year. The accounting estimates used to compute the provision for income taxes may change as new events occur,
additional information is obtained, or the tax environment changes.
Furthermore,
in December 2019, the FASB issued ASU No. 2019-12, Income
Taxes: Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes
(“ASU 2019-12”). The new guidance affects general principles within Topic 740, Income
Taxes. The amendments
of ASU 2019-12 are meant to simplify and reduce the cost of accounting for income taxes. The Company adopted the ASU during the first
quarter of 2021 using a prospective approach. The adoption of the ASU did not have a material impact on the Company’s condensed
consolidated financial statements.
Warrants
The Company evaluates
all of its financial instruments, including issued warrants, to determine if such instruments are liability classified, pursuant to ASC
480 - Distinguishing
Liabilities from Equity
(“ASC 480”) or derivatives or contain features that qualify as embedded derivatives pursuant to ASC 815 – Derivatives
and Hedging (“ASC
815”). The classification of instruments, including whether such instruments should be recorded as liabilities or as equity, is
re-assessed at the end of each reporting period. Issuance costs incurred with the Business Combination that are attributable to liability
classified warrants are expensed as incurred.
Recently
Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In
February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases
(Topic 842), to increase transparency and comparability among organizations by recognizing lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance
sheet and disclosing key information about leasing arrangements. In July 2018, ASU 2018-10, Codification
Improvements to Topic 842,
Leases,
was issued to provide more detailed guidance and additional clarification for implementing ASU 2016-02. Furthermore, in July 2018, the
FASB issued ASU 2018-11, Leases
(Topic 842): Targeted Improvements,
which provides an optional transition method in addition to the existing modified retrospective transition method by allowing a cumulative
effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings in the period of adoption. Furthermore, on June 3, 2020, the FASB deferred
by one year the effective date of the new leases standard for private companies, private not-for-profits (“NFPs”) and public
NFPs that have not yet issued (or made available for
PureCycle
Technologies, Inc.
NOTES
TO THE INTERIM CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – CONTINUED
(Unaudited)
issuance)
financial statements reflecting the new standard. These new leasing standards are effective for the Company beginning after December 15,
2021 and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2022, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently
evaluating the effect of the adoption of this guidance on the consolidated financial statements.
In
June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, Financial
Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses of Financial Instruments (“ASU
2016-13”), which, together with subsequent amendments, amends the requirement on the measurement and recognition of expected credit
losses for financial assets held. ASU 2016-13 is effective for the Company beginning December 15, 2022, including interim periods within
those fiscal years, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently in the process of evaluating the effects of this pronouncement
on the Company's financial statements and does not expect it to have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.
In
August 2020, the FASB issued ASU No. 2020-06, Debt
- Debt with Conversion and Other Options (Subtopic 470-20) and Derivatives and Hedging - Contracts in Entity’s Own Equity (Subtopic
815-40) (“ASU
2020-06”). ASU 2020-06 simplifies the accounting for convertible debt instruments and convertible preferred stock by removing the
existing guidance in ASC 470-20 that requires entities to account for beneficial conversion features and cash conversion features in equity,
separately from the host convertible debt or preferred stock. Two methods of transition were permitted upon adoption: full retrospective
and modified retrospective. The Company elected to apply the modified retrospective adoption approach to all contracts. Under this approach,
prior periods were not restated. Rather, convertible notes and other disclosures for prior periods were provided in the notes to the financial
statements as previously reported under ASC 470-20, and the cumulative effect of initially applying the guidance was recognized as an
adjustment to Notes payable, Additional paid-in-capital (“APIC”), and Accumulated deficit.
As
a result of applying the modified retrospective method to adopt ASU 2020-06, adjustments were made to the consolidated balance sheets
as of December 31, 2020 and the below illustrates how the notes payable, APIC, and accumulated deficit balances would be effected as of
January 1, 2021 (in thousands, as adjusted to show the effect of the reverse recapitalization as described in Note 1):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December
31, 2020 |
|
January
1, 2021 |
|
|
As
reported |
Adjustments |
As
adjusted |
Notes
payable |
|
$ |
26,599 |
|
$ |
30,638 |
|
$ |
57,237 |
|
APIC |
|
192,381 |
|
(31,075) |
|
161,306 |
|
Accumulated
deficit |
|
$ |
84,563 |
|
$ |
437 |
|
$ |
85,000 |
|
NOTE
3 – NOTES
PAYABLE AND DEBT INSTRUMENTS
Secured
Term Loan
Enhanced
Capital Ohio Rural Fund, LLC
On
February 28, 2019, Legacy PCT entered into a subordinated debt agreement with Enhanced Capital Ohio Rural Fund, LLC. The agreement provides
for principal of $1.0 million
with an interest rate of the U.S. Federal prime rate per annum.
As
of June 30, 2021, and December 31, 2020, the outstanding balance of the loan is $0.
On October 7, 2020, upon the closing of the revenue bond offering, the full outstanding balance was paid off. Legacy PCT incurred $8 thousand
and $20 thousand
of interest cost during the three and six months ended June 30, 2020, respectively.
PureCycle
Technologies, Inc.
NOTES
TO THE INTERIM CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – CONTINUED
(Unaudited)
Promissory
Notes
Koch
Modular Process Systems Secured Promissory Note
On
December 20, 2019, Legacy PCT entered into an agreement with Koch Modular Process Systems LLC (“KMPS”) to convert the current
balance of Account Payable due to KMPS into a promissory note. Legacy PCT issued a Secured Promissory Note for a principal amount of $1.7 million
with a maximum advance of funds up to $3.0 million.
During the six months ended June 30, 2020, Legacy PCT converted $945 thousand
of Accounts Payable into the note. The rate of interest on the loan balance is 21%
per annum through the month of November 2019 and 24%
per annum for December 2019 and thereafter.
As
of June 30, 2021, and December 31, 2020, the outstanding balance on the promissory note is $0.
On October 7, 2020, upon the closing of the revenue bond offering, the full outstanding balance was paid off. Legacy PCT incurred $134 thousand
and $235 thousand
of interest cost during the three and six months ended June 30, 2020, respectively.
Denham-Blythe
Company, Inc. Secured Promissory Note
On
December 20, 2019, Legacy PCT and Denham-Blythe Company, Inc. (“DB”) entered into an agreement to convert the current balance
of Account Payable due to DB into a promissory note. Legacy PCT issued a Secured Promissory Note for a principal amount of $2.0 million.
The rate of interest on the loan balance is 24%
per annum for December 2019 and thereafter with interest on the loan payable monthly.
As
of June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, the outstanding balance on the promissory note is $0.
On October 7, 2020, upon the closing of the revenue bond offering, the full outstanding balance was paid off. Legacy PCT incurred $122 thousand
and $243 thousand
of interest cost during the three and six months ended June 30, 2020, respectively. As the promissory note was used to construct the Company’s
property, plant and equipment, a portion of the interest cost incurred was capitalized within Property, Plant and Equipment.
Promissory
Note to Related Party
Innventus
Fund I, LP
On
July 19, 2019, Legacy PCT entered into a Note and Warrant Financing agreement with Innventus Fund I, LP (now known as Innventus ESG Fund
I L.P.) to obtain a $600 thousand
loan and warrant financing. The Negotiable Promissory Note had a maturity date of October 21, 2019, and an interest rate of 1-month LIBOR
plus 8.0%.
The aggregate unpaid principal amount of the loan and all accrued and unpaid interest is due on the maturity date. Legacy PCT repaid the
principal and all accrued and unpaid interest on February 5, 2020. Legacy PCT incurred $0
and $5 thousand
of interest cost during three and six months ended June 30, 2020, respectively.
Auto
Now Acceptance Company, LLC
On
May 5, 2017, Legacy PCT entered into a revolving line of credit facility (the “Credit Agreement”) with Auto Now Acceptance
Company, LLC, a related party.
On
May 3, 2018, the Credit Agreement was amended and restated in its entirety and secured by a Security Agreement dated May 3, 2018. The
credit facility was increased to $14.0 million,
bearing interest at a rate of LIBOR plus 6.12%
per annum, payable monthly. The maturity date was extended to August 15, 2018.
On
July 31, 2018, the Credit Agreement was amended to extend the maturity date to February 15, 2019. Under the agreement, the Auto Now’s
advances of funds to Legacy PCT ceased on July 31, 2018.
On
May 29, 2020, Legacy PCT executed a Second Amended and Restated the Security Agreement and entered into a Third Amended and Restated Promissory
Note agreement to extend the financing on the loan from Auto Now Acceptance Company, LLC. The agreement extended the maturity date of
the loan to June 30, 2021 and adjusted the interest rate on the third amended loan agreement. The security interests include inventory,
equipment, accounts receivables and all the Company’s assets. The interest rate within the amendment increased as follows:
PureCycle
Technologies, Inc.
NOTES
TO THE INTERIM CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – CONTINUED
(Unaudited)
•The
annual rate of the 1-month LIBOR in U.S. dollars plus 6.12%
adjusted daily, from May 3, 2018 through May 18, 2020
•12%
per annum from May 19, 2020 through August 31, 2020
•16%
per annum from September 1, 2020 through December 31, 2020
•24%
per annum from January 1, 2021 through June 30, 2021
As
of June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, the outstanding balance on the credit facility is $0.
On December 21, 2020, Legacy PCT repaid the outstanding balance on the note. Legacy PCT incurred $351 thousand
and $705 thousand
of interest cost during the three and six months ended June 30, 2020, respectively. As the promissory note was used to construct the Company’s
property, plant and equipment, a portion of the interest cost incurred was capitalized within Property, Plant and Equipment.
Advances
from Related Parties
During
2019 and 2020, Legacy PCT received $746 thousand
of funding and support services from Innventure1 LLC (formerly Innventure LLC) and Wasson Enterprises. On March 26, 2020, $375 thousand
of the balance was repaid. The remaining balance of $371 thousand
was assigned from Wasson Enterprise to Innventure LLC (Formerly WE-Innventure LLC).
Convertible
Notes
On
October 6, 2020, Legacy PCT entered into a Senior Notes Purchase Agreement (the “Agreement”) with certain investors. The Agreement
provides for the issuance of Senior Convertible Notes (the “Notes”), which have an interest rate of 5.875%
and mature on October 15, 2022 (the “Maturity Date”) and are subject to a six-month
maturity extension at the Company’s option with respect to 50%
of the then outstanding Notes on a pro rata basis, unless repurchased or converted prior to such date (“Maturity Date Extension”).
The initial closing took place on the date of the Indenture on October 7, 2020 (the “First Closing”), upon which $48.0
million in aggregate principal of Notes were issued to the Investors (“the Magnetar Investors”). The Agreement also includes
an obligation for the Company to issue and sell, and for each of the Magnetar Investors to purchase, Notes in the principal amount of
$12.0
million within 45
days after the Company enters into the Merger Agreement as defined in Note 1 (“Second Closing Obligation”). On December 29,
2020, the remaining Notes were purchased in accordance with the Agreement. On April 15, 2021, the first interest payment of $1.7 million
was paid entirely in kind, which increased the principal amount of the Convertible Notes by $1.7 million
(“PIK Interest”). The Notes are convertible through the Maturity Date at the option of the holder. Following the consummation
of the Business Combination, however, each holder was required to agree not to convert its Notes (except in connection with a Change of
Control or Fundamental Change (each as defined in the Indenture) for a period not to exceed one hundred eighty (180)
days following the consummation of the Business Combination, or September 13, 2021). As of June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020,
none
of the Notes were converted into shares of common stock. The Notes are recorded within notes payable in the condensed consolidated balance
sheet. As the Notes were used to construct the Company’s property, plant and equipment, a portion of the interest costs incurred
were capitalized within property, plant and equipment.
The
following provides a summary of the interest expense of PCT’s convertible debt instruments (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three
months ended June 30, |
Six
months ended June 30, |
|
2021 |
2020 |
2021 |
2020 |
Contractual
interest expense |
$ |
902 |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
1,783 |
|
$ |
— |
|
Amortization
of deferred financing costs |
439 |
|
— |
|
1,080 |
|
— |
|
Effective
interest rate |
9.0 |
% |
— |
% |
9.0 |
% |
— |
% |
PureCycle
Technologies, Inc.
NOTES
TO THE INTERIM CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – CONTINUED
(Unaudited)
The
following provides a summary of the convertible notes (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As
of |
|
June
30, 2021 |
December
31, 2020 |
Unamortized
deferred issuance costs |
$ |
2,477 |
|
$ |
3,288 |
|
Net
carrying amount |
59,203 |
|
56,712 |
|
Fair
value |
$ |
215,543 |
|
$ |
123,532 |
|
Fair
value level |
Level
3 |
Level
3 |
As
of June 30, 2021, as a result of the Business Combination, the conversion price of the notes changed to the quotient of (A) $1,000
and (B) the SPAC transaction PIPE valuation; provided that if the Equity Value of the Company in connection with the SPAC Transaction
is greater than $775.0 million,
the conversion rate shall equal the product of (1) the amount that would otherwise be calculated pursuant to this clause set forth above
and (2) a fraction equal to the Equity Value of the Company divided by $775.0 million
(as such terms are defined in the indenture governing the Notes). The conversion price is $6.93
for potential conversion into approximately 8.9
million shares of common stock.
As
of December 31, 2020 the conversion price of the notes was the quotient of $1,000
and the quotient of (A) 80%
of the Adjusted Equity Value of the Company as determined based upon the sale of approximately 684 thousand
Legacy PCT Class A Units at $87.69
per unit (the “November Investment”) and (B) the number of outstanding shares of Capital Stock of the Company on a Fully-Diluted
Basis immediately prior to the November Investment (as such terms are defined in the indenture governing the Notes).
Revenue
Bonds
On
October 7, 2020, the Southern Ohio Port Authority (“SOPA”) issued certain revenue bonds (“Bonds”) and loaned the
proceeds from their sale to PureCycle: Ohio LLC, an Ohio limited liability company (“PCO”), pursuant to a loan agreement dated
as of October 1, 2020 between SOPA and PCO (“Loan Agreement”), to be used to (i) acquire, construct and equip the Phase II
Facility; (ii) fund a debt service reserve fund for the Series 2020A Bonds; (iii) finance capitalized interest; and (iv) pay the costs
of issuing the Bonds. The Bonds were offered in three
series, including (i) Exempt Facility Revenue Bonds (PureCycle Project), Tax-Exempt Series 2020A (“Series 2020A Bonds”); (ii)
Subordinate Exempt Facility Revenue Bonds (PureCycle Project), Tax-Exempt Series 2020B (“Series 2020B Bonds”); and (iii) Subordinated
Exempt Facility Revenue Bonds (PureCycle Project), Taxable Series 2020C (“Series 2020C Bonds”), each series in the aggregate
principal amount, bearing interest and maturing as shown in the table below. The Series 2020A Bonds were issued at a total discount of
$5.5 million.
The discount is amortized over the term of the Bonds using the effective interest method. The purchase price of the Bonds was paid and
immediately available to SOPA on October 7, 2020, the date of delivery of the Bonds to their original purchaser. PureCycle is not a direct
obligor on the Bonds and is not a party to the Loan Agreement or the indenture of trust dated as of October 1, 2020 (“Indenture”),
between SOPA and UMB Bank, N.A as trustee (“Trustee”), pursuant to which the Bonds have been issued. Legacy PCT has executed
a guaranty of completion dated as of October 7, 2020 (“Completion Guaranty”), with respect to the full and complete performance
by PCO of PCO’s obligations with respect to construction and completion of the Project, including construction by the Completion
Date, free and clear of any liens (other than permitted liens), and the payment of all Project costs incurred prior to completion of the
Project, and all claims, liabilities, losses and damages owed by PCO to each counterparty under the Project Documents (as such terms are
defined in the Indenture). In addition, pursuant to the Guaranty, PureCycle is obligated to fund and maintain a liquidity reserve for
the Project during the term of the Guaranty in the amount of $50.0 million
to be held in an escrow account with U.S. Bank National Association, as escrow agent (“Liquidity Reserve”). Pursuant to the
terms of the Loan Agreement PCO executed promissory notes, one in the aggregate principal amount of each series of Bonds, in favor of
SOPA, which were assigned to the Trustee on October 7, 2020.
PureCycle
Technologies, Inc.
NOTES
TO THE INTERIM CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – CONTINUED
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in
thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Bond
Series |
Term |
Principal
Amount |
|
Interest
Rate |
Maturity
Date |
2020A |
A1 |
$ |
12,370 |
|
|
6.25 |
% |
December
1, 2025 |
2020A |
A2 |
$ |
38,700 |
|
|
6.50 |
% |
December
1, 2030 |
2020A |
A3 |
$ |
168,480 |
|
|
7.00 |
% |
December
1, 2042 |
2020B |
B1 |
$ |
10,000 |
|
|
10.00 |
% |
December
1, 2025 |
2020B |
B2 |
$ |
10,000 |
|
|
10.00 |
% |
December
1, 2027 |
2020C |
C1 |
$ |
10,000 |
|
|
13.00 |
% |
December
1, 2027 |
The
proceeds of the Bonds and certain equity contributions have been placed in various trust funds and non-interest-bearing accounts established
and administered by the Trustee under the Indenture. Before each disbursement of amounts in the Project Fund held by the Trustee under
the Indenture, PCO is required to submit to the Trustee a requisition for funds to be disbursed outlining the specified purpose of the
disbursement and substantiating the expenditure. In addition, 100%
of revenue attributable to the production of the Phase II Facility must be deposited into an operating revenue escrow fund held by U.S.
Bank National Association, as escrow agent. Funds in the trust accounts and operating revenue escrow account will be disbursed by the
Trustee when certain conditions are met, and will be used to pay costs and expenditures related to the development of the Phase II Facility,
make required interest and principal payments (including sinking fund redemption amounts) and any premium, in certain circumstances required
under the Indenture, to redeem the Bonds.
As
conditions for closing the Bonds, Legacy PCT contributed $60.0 million
in equity at closing and PureCycle and certain affiliates contributed an additional $40.0 million
in equity upon the Closing of the Business Combination. PureCycle provided the Liquidity Reserve for the Phase II Facility construction
of $50.0 million
and deposited the amount upon the Closing of the Business Combination. In addition, PureCycle must maintain at least $75.0 million
of cash on its balance sheet as of July 31, 2021 and $100.0 million
of cash on its balance sheet as of January 31, 2022, in each case, including the Liquidity Reserve. The Company has met this requirement
as of July 31, 2021.
The
Bonds are recorded within Bonds payable in the condensed consolidated balance sheet. The Company incurred $4.8
million and $0
of interest cost during the three months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively, and $9.6
million and $0
of interest cost during the six months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively. As the Bond proceeds will be used to construct the
Company’s property, plant and equipment, a portion of the interest costs incurred was capitalized within Property, Plant and Equipment.
Management believes the fair value of the Revenue Bonds is not materially different than the carrying amount.
In
connection with its obligations under that certain Security Agreement dated as of October 7, 2020, between PCO, as debtor, and the Trustee,
as secured party, entered into when the Bonds were issued (the “Security Agreement”), PCO must deliver consent and agreements
(“Consents”) to the Trustee with respect to each agreement entered into in connection with the Project, each of which agreements
is required under the Loan Agreement to be assigned to the Trustee. The forms of the Consents relating to a certain feedstock supply agreement
from one
supplier of feedstock to the Project (the “Supplier”) and from two
purchasers of offtake from the Project (“Offtaker 2” and “Offtaker 3” and together with the Supplier, the “Counterparties”)
delivered to the Trustee contained terms inconsistent with the form of the Consent required under the Security Agreement. On May 11, 2021,
the Guaranty was amended and restated in an amended and restated guaranty of completion (the “ARG”) executed by PureCycle
and delivered to the Trustee, which broadens the purposes for which draws by the Trustee on the Liquidity Reserve may be utilized, extends
the period during which the Liquidity Reserve must be maintained, includes conditions that would permit a reduction in the amount of the
Liquidity Reserve required to be maintained by PureCycle, and includes conditions precedent to the elimination of the requirement that
PureCycle replenish the Liquidity Reserve and to the termination of the ARG and the escrow agreement under which the Liquidity Reserve
is held by the escrow agent (the “Escrow Agreement”), upon which termination, the balance of the Liquidity Reserve will be
PureCycle
Technologies, Inc.
NOTES
TO THE INTERIM CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – CONTINUED
(Unaudited)
returned
to PureCycle. So long as there are any Series 2020A Bonds outstanding under the Indenture, the ARG and the Escrow Agreement will remain
in place upon the conditions stated in the ARG. The terms of the ARG are summarized as follows: The Liquidity Reserve shall be maintained
in the amount of $50.0 million,
subject to replenishment by PureCycle until certain conditions stated in the ARG relating to the following have been met: (i) the completion
of construction and acquisition of the Project, (ii) the payment of all Project costs, and (iii) the replacement of the assigned agreements
of the Counterparties underlying the Consents which have expired or terminated, with one or more agreements between counterparties and
PCO upon terms at least as favorable to PCO as the expired or terminated agreements of the Counterparties, (a) for which a Consent that
conforms to the form of Consent required by the Security Agreement is executed by the counterparties and provided to the Trustee, (b)
which, in the case of supply of feedstock to the Project, provide in the aggregate for the supply of at least the minimum and maximum
volumes of feedstock meeting substantially similar feedstock specifications as the Supplier had committed to supply, and (c) which, in
the case of purchase of offtake from the Project, provide in the aggregate for the purchase of the minimum and maximum volumes of offtake
from the Project meeting substantially similar specifications as Offtaker 2 and Offtaker 3 had committed to purchase from PCO. When the
conditions stated in (i), (ii) and (iii) above have been satisfied but so long as there are Series 2020A Bonds outstanding under the Indenture,
the Escrow Agreement shall remain in place but the Liquidity Reserve amount shall be reduced to $25 million
and PureCycle shall no longer be required to replenish the amount of the reduced Liquidity Reserve if and when disbursements are made
therefrom. If the conditions of (i) and (ii) have been met but only a portion of the feedstock and offtake contracted for by the Counterparties,
respectively, has been replaced under replacement agreements as aforesaid in (iii) above, then the Liquidity Reserve amount may be reduced
only by the applicable proportion of the amounts stated in the ARG which evidence the intent of the parties of the amount of value representing
the supply or offtake of the agreements of the Counterparties. When the conditions precedent of (i), (ii), and (iii) have been satisfied
and there are no longer any Series 2020A Bonds then outstanding, then PureCycle shall have no obligation to maintain the reduced Liquidity
Reserve, the ARG and the Escrow Agreement shall terminate and the balance on deposit in the Liquidity Reserve escrow fund held by the
escrow agent shall be returned to PureCycle.
So long as any Series
2020A Bonds remain outstanding under the Indenture, upon the occurrence of an Event of Default under the Loan Agreement or Indenture,
if the Trustee takes control of the Liquidity Reserve held by the escrow agent, such funds may be used for any purpose, including the
payment of debt service on the Series 2020A Bonds, as may be determined by the Trustee or directed by a majority of the holders of the
Series 2020A Bonds then outstanding.
Paycheck
Protection Program
On
May 4, 2020, Legacy PCT entered into a Paycheck Protection Program (the “Program”, or “PPP loan”) Term Note with
PNC Bank to obtain principal of approximately $314
thousand. This Note is issued pursuant to the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act’s (the “CARES Act”)
(P.L. 116-136) Paycheck Protection Program. During a period from May 4, 2020 until the forgiveness amount is known, (“Deferral Period”),
interest on the outstanding principal balance will accrue at the Fixed Rate of 1%
per annum, but neither principal nor interest shall be due during the Deferral Period. Legacy PCT applied for loan forgiveness as of December
31, 2020, and forgiveness was granted for the full outstanding principal balance of $314
thousand on April 9, 2021.
The
outstanding balance on the loan is approximately $0
and $314
thousand as of June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, respectively, with $0
and $122
thousand recorded as Notes payable – current and $0
and $192
thousand recorded as Notes payable in the condensed consolidated balance sheets.
NOTE
4 - STOCKHOLDERS’
EQUITY
The
condensed consolidated statements of stockholders’ equity reflect the reverse recapitalization as discussed in Note 1 as of March
17, 2021. As Legacy PCT was deemed the accounting acquirer in the reverse recapitalization with ROCH, all periods prior to the consummation
date reflect the balances and activity of Legacy PCT. The consolidated balances and the audited consolidated financial statements of Legacy
PCT, as of December 31, 2020, and the share activity and per share amounts in these condensed consolidated statements of equity were retroactively
adjusted, where applicable, using the recapitalization exchange ratio of 10.52
for Legacy PCT Class A Units. Legacy PCT Class B Preferred Units were converted into shares of PCT common stock at a share conversion
PureCycle
Technologies, Inc.
NOTES
TO THE INTERIM CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – CONTINUED
(Unaudited)
factor
of 10.642
whereas Legacy PCT Class B-1 Preferred Units were converted into shares of PCT common stock at a share conversion factor of 14.768
as a result of the reverse recapitalization. Legacy PCT Class C Units were converted into shares of PCT common stock at a share conversion
factor of 9.32,
7.40,
or 2.747,
based on the distribution threshold of the Class C Unit.
Common
Stock
Holders
of PCT common stock are entitled to one
vote for each share held of record on all matters submitted to a vote of stockholders. The holders do not have cumulative voting rights
in the election of directors. Upon the Company’s liquidation, dissolution or winding up and after payment in full of all amounts
required to be paid to creditors and to the holders of preferred stock having liquidation preferences, if any, the holders of the Company’s
common stock will be entitled to receive pro rata the Company’s remaining assets available for distribution. Holders of the Company’s
common stock do not have preemptive, subscription, redemption or conversion rights. All shares of the Company’s common stock are
fully paid and non-assessable. The Company is authorized to issue 250.0 million
shares of common stock with a par value of $0.001.
As of June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, 117.34
million and 0
shares are issued and outstanding, respectively.
Preferred
Stock
As
of June 30, 2021, the Company is authorized to issue 25.0 million
shares of preferred stock with a par value of $0.001,
of which no
shares are issued and outstanding.
NOTE
5 - EQUITY-BASED
COMPENSATION
2021
Equity Incentive Plan
In
connection with the Business Combination, on March 17, 2021, our stockholders approved the PureCycle Technologies, Inc. 2021 Equity and
Incentive Compensation Plan (the “Plan”).
The
Plan provides for the grant of stock options, stock appreciation rights (“SARs”), restricted stock, restricted stock units
(“RSUs”), performance shares, performance units, dividend equivalents, and certain other awards. As of June 30, 2021,
approximately 8.28
million shares of common stock are reserved for issuance under the Plan.
Restricted
Stock Agreements
In
connection with the Closing, on March 17, 2021, PCT entered into restricted stock agreements with various PureCycle employees who held
unvested Legacy PCT Class C Units at the Closing (the “Restricted Stock Agreements”). The outstanding unvested Legacy PCT
Class C Units, issued pursuant to the PCT Technologies LLC Amended and Restated Equity Incentive Plan, were converted to PCT’s restricted
shares, subject to the same vesting schedule and forfeiture restrictions as the unvested Legacy PCT Class C Units they replace.
The
shares issued pursuant to the Restricted Stock Agreements are time-based and vest over the period defined in each individual grant agreement
or upon a change of control event as defined in the agreement. The Company has the option to repurchase all vested shares upon a stockholder’s
termination of employment or service with the Company.
PureCycle
Technologies, Inc.
NOTES
TO THE INTERIM CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – CONTINUED
(Unaudited)
The
Company recognizes compensation expense for the shares equal to the fair value of the equity-based compensation awards and is recognized
on a straight-line basis over the vesting period of such awards. The
fair value of the stock is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model using the following assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021 |
|
2020 |
Expected
annual dividend yield |
— |
% |
|
— |
% |
Expected
volatility |
49.1 |
% |
|
42.1
- 63.3% |
Risk-free
rate of return |
0.1 |
% |
|
1.6
- 1.7% |
Expected
option term (years) |
0.2 |
|
0.8
- 4.4 |
The
expected term of the shares granted is determined based on the period of time the shares are expected to be outstanding. The risk-free
rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant. The expected volatility was based on the Company’s
capital structure and volatility of similar entities referred to as guideline companies. In determining similar entities, the Company
considered industry, stage of life cycle, size and financial leverage. The dividend yield on the Company’s shares is assumed to
be zero
as the Company has not historically paid dividends. The fair value of the underlying Company shares for the six months ended June 30,
2021 was determined using an initial public offering scenario. The fair value of the underlying Company shares for the three months ended
June 30, 2020 was determined using a hybrid method consisting of an option pricing method and an initial public offering scenario.
A
summary of restricted stock activity for the six months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020 is as follows (in thousands except per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number
of RSU's |
|
Weighted
average grant date fair value |
|
Weighted
average remaining recognition period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-vested
at December 31, 2019 |
73 |
|
|
$ |
2.21 |
|
|
|
Recapitalized |
607 |
|
|
(1.97) |
|
|
|
Non-vested
at December 31, 2019 (after effect of recapitalization) |
680 |
|
|
0.24 |
|
|
|
Granted |
573 |
|
|
2.02 |
|
|
|
Vested |
(520) |
|
|
0.97 |
|
|
|
Forfeited |
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
Non-vested
at June 30, 2020 |
733 |
|
|
$ |
1.11 |
|
|
1.80 |
PureCycle
Technologies, Inc.
NOTES
TO THE INTERIM CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – CONTINUED
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number
of RSU's |
|
Weighted
average grant date fair value |
|
Weighted
average remaining recognition period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-vested
at December 31, 2020 |
91 |
|
|
$ |
11.58 |
|
|
|
Recapitalization |
671 |
|
|
(10.19) |
|
|
|
Non-vested
at December 31, 2020 (after effect of recapitalization) |
762 |
|
|
1.39 |
|
|
|
Granted |
143 |
|
|
11.90 |
|
|
|
Vested |
(245) |
|
|
1.20 |
|
|
|
Forfeited |
(26) |
|
|
3.92 |
|
|
|
Non-vested
at June 30, 2021 |
634 |
|
|
$ |
2.10 |
|
|
2.08 |
Equity-based
compensation cost is recorded within the selling, general and administrative expenses and operating costs in the condensed consolidated
statements of comprehensive loss, and totaled approximately $222
thousand and $173
thousand for the three months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively, and $461
thousand and $590
thousand for the six months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
Stock
Options
The
stock options issued pursuant to the Plan are time-based and vest over the period defined in each individual grant agreement or upon a
change of control event as defined in the Plan.
The
Company recognizes compensation expense for the shares equal to the fair value of the equity-based compensation awards and is recognized
on a straight-line basis over the vesting period of such awards. The
fair value of the stock is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model using the following assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021 |
|
2020 |
Expected
annual dividend yield |
— |
% |
|
— |
% |
Expected
volatility |
47.5 |
% |
|
— |
% |
Risk-free
rate of return |
0.7 |
% |
|
— |
% |
Expected
option term (years) |
4.5 |
|
0 |
The
expected term of the shares granted is determined based on the period of time the shares are expected to be outstanding. The risk-free
rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant. The expected volatility was based on the Company’s
capital structure and volatility of similar entities referred to as guideline companies. In determining similar entities, the Company
considered industry, stage of life cycle, size and financial leverage. The dividend yield on the Company’s shares is assumed to
be zero
as the Company has not historically paid dividends. The fair value of the underlying Company shares was determined using the Company’s
closing stock price on the grant date.
PureCycle
Technologies, Inc.
NOTES
TO THE INTERIM CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – CONTINUED
(Unaudited)
A
summary of stock option activity for the six months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020 is as follows (in thousands except per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number
of Options |
|
Weighted
Average Exercise Price |
|
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (Years) |
Balance,
December 31, 2019 |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
— |
Granted |
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
Exercised |
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
Forfeited |
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
Balance,
June 30, 2020 |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number
of Options |
|
Weighted
Average Exercise Price |
|
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (Years) |
Balance,
December 31, 2020 |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
— |
Granted |
613 |
|
|
28.90 |
|
|
7 |
Exercised |
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
Forfeited |
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
Balance,
June, 2021 |
613 |
|
|
$ |
28.90 |
|
|
6.75 |
Exercisable |
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
Equity-based
compensation cost is recorded within the selling, general and administrative expenses within the condensed consolidated statements of
comprehensive loss and totaled approximately $613
thousand and $0
for the three months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively, and $681
thousand and $0
for the six months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively. The weighted average grant-date fair values of options granted during the
six months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020 were $11.41
and $0,
respectively. There were no
stock options exercised during 2021 or 2020.
NOTE 6 - WARRANTS
Warrants
issued to purchase Legacy PCT Class B Preferred Units
On
October 16, 2015, Legacy PCT issued a unit purchase warrant to P&G in connection with the patent licensing agreement described in
Note 10, for 211 thousand
warrants at an aggregate exercise price of $1.00,
allowing P&G to purchase a variable number of Legacy PCT Class B Preferred Units during the exercise period of April 15, 2019 through
April 15, 2024. The warrants were determined to vest at the start of the exercise period. The number of warrants available to P&G
to purchase is equal to an amount that initially represented 5%
of all outstanding equity of Legacy PCT on a fully diluted basis. Additionally, the warrant agreement contains an anti-dilution provision,
which states that the number of warrants exercisable upon full exercise of the warrant will be subject to adjustment, such that the ownership
percentage is not reduced below 2.5%
sharing percentage in the Company, on a fully diluted basis.
Legacy
PCT determined the warrants issued are liability classified under ASC 480. Accordingly, the warrants were held at their initial fair value
and remeasured at fair value at each subsequent reporting date with changes in the fair value presented in the statements of comprehensive
loss.
PureCycle
Technologies, Inc.
NOTES
TO THE INTERIM CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – CONTINUED
(Unaudited)
On
October 15, 2020, P&G exercised all 211 thousand
of the warrants for total proceeds of $1.
The fair value of the Legacy Class B Preferred Units on the date of exercise was $18.17 million
and was recorded in APIC. In connection with the exercise, the Company recorded a loss of $211 thousand.
A
summary of the Legacy PCT Class B warrant activity for six months ended June 30, 2020 is as follows (in thousands except per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number
of warrants |
|
Weighted
average exercise price |
|
Weighted
average grant date fair value |
|
Weighted
average remaining contractual term (years) |
Outstanding
at December 31, 2019 |
211 |
|
$ |
1.00 |
|
|
$ |
30.63 |
|
|
4.29 |
Granted |
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
Exercised |
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
Outstanding
at June 30, 2020 |
211 |
|
$ |
1.00 |
|
|
$ |
30.63 |
|
|
3.79 |
Exercisable |
211 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
Company recognized expense of $0
and $1.78
million for the six months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively, in connection with these warrants, which was recorded within the
Change in fair value of warrants line item in the condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive loss. The warrants were exercised
in the fourth quarter of 2020, therefore there was no activity during the six months ended June 30, 2021.
Warrants
issued to purchase Legacy PCT Class B-1 Preferred Units
On
June 5, 2019, in connection with a Legacy PCT Class B-1 Preferred Unit purchase agreement with a related party, Legacy PCT issued a unit
purchase warrant for 8 thousand
warrants at an exercise price of $37.61,
allowing the related party to purchase a variable number of Legacy PCT Class B-1 Preferred Units during the exercise period of June 5,
2019 through June 4, 2024.
Legacy
PCT determined the warrants are not a freestanding instrument under ASC 480. Also, the warrants are determined to be clearly and closely
related to the Legacy PCT Class B-1 Preferred Units under ASC 815, Derivatives
and Hedging. Accordingly,
they are not recorded in the financial statements until exercised. On March 12, 2021, the warrants were cancelled prior to the closing
of the Business Combination.
On
July 22, 2019, in connection with a bridge note and warrant financing agreement with Innventus Fund I, L.P. (now known as Innventus ESG
Fund I L.P.), Legacy PCT issued a unit purchase warrant for 5 thousand
warrants at an exercise price of $37.61,
allowing Innventus to purchase a variable number of Legacy PCT Class B-1 Preferred Units during the exercise period of July 22, 2019 through
July 22, 2024.
Legacy
PCT determined the warrants issued are equity classified under ASC 480. Accordingly, the warrants were held at their initial fair value
with no subsequent remeasurement. On March 12, 2021, the warrants were cancelled prior to the closing of the Business Combination.
PureCycle
Technologies, Inc.
NOTES
TO THE INTERIM CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – CONTINUED
(Unaudited)
A
summary of the Class B-1 warrant activity for the six months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020 is as follows (in thousands except per share
data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number
of warrants |
|
Weighted
average exercise price |
|
Weighted
average grant date fair value |
|
Weighted
average remaining contractual term (years) |
Outstanding
at December 31, 2019 |
5 |
|
$ |
37.61 |
|
|
$ |
15.52 |
|
|
4.56 |
Granted |
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
0 |
Exercised |
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
0 |
Outstanding
at June 30, 2020 |
5 |
|
$ |
37.61 |
|
|
$ |
15.52 |
|
|
4.06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December
31, 2020 |
5 |
|
$ |
37.61 |
|
|
$ |
15.52 |
|
|
3.56 |
Granted |
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
0 |
Exercised |
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
0 |
Cancelled |
$ |
(5) |
|
|
$ |
37.61 |
|
|
$ |
15.52 |
|
|
3.56 |
Outstanding at June 30,
2021 |
— |
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
0 |
Exercisable |
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
Company recognized no
expense for the six months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
Warrants
issued to purchase Legacy PCT Class C Units
On
June 29, 2018, the Legacy PCT Board approved the issuance of warrants to RTI Global (“RTI”) under the terms of a professional
services agreement to purchase an aggregate of 144 thousand
of Legacy PCT Class C Units at an aggregated exercise price of $37.605
per unit. The warrants vested immediately upon issuance and expire on June 29, 2023 or upon a change in control event, as defined in the
warrant agreement. The Company determined the warrants issued are equity classified under ASC 480. Accordingly, the warrants were held
at their initial fair value with no subsequent remeasurement.
In
connection with the Business Combination discussed in Note 1, the Company modified the warrant agreement to purchase 971 thousand
shares of PCT common stock instead of Legacy PCT Class C Units on November 20, 2020. RTI can exercise these warrants upon the first anniversary
of Closing of the Business Combination. The warrants expire on December 31, 2024. In connection with the modification of the agreement,
the Company determined the warrants issued are liability classified under ASC 480. Accordingly, the warrants were held at their initial
fair value and will be remeasured at fair value at each subsequent reporting date with changes in the fair value presented in the statements
of comprehensive loss.
As
of June 30, 2021. the Company has determined its warrants to be a Level 3 fair value measurement and used the Black-Scholes option-pricing
model using the following assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected
annual dividend yield |
— |
% |
Expected
volatility |
48.51
- 50.1% |
Risk-free
rate of return |
0.56 |
% |
Expected
option term (years) |
3.5
– 3.75 |
The
expected term of the warrants granted are determined based on the duration of time the warrants are expected to be outstanding. The risk-free
rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant. The expected volatility was based on the Company’s
capital structure and volatility of similar entities referred to as guideline companies. In determining similar entities, the Company
considered industry, stage of life cycle, size and financial leverage. The dividend yield on the Company’s warrants is assumed to
be zero
as the Company has not
PureCycle
Technologies, Inc.
NOTES
TO THE INTERIM CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – CONTINUED
(Unaudited)
historically
paid dividends. The fair value of the underlying Company shares was determined using the Black-Scholes calculation. Refer to Note 12 for
more details on the fair value considerations of the warrants.
A
summary of the RTI warrant activity for the six months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020 is as follows (in thousands, except per share data,
as adjusted to show the effect of the reverse recapitalization as described in Note 1):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number
of warrants |
|
Weighted
average exercise price |
|
Weighted
average grant date fair value |
|
Weighted
average remaining contractual term (years) |
Outstanding
at December 31, 2019 |
971 |
|
|
$ |
5.56 |
|
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
5 |
Granted |
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
Exercised |
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
Outstanding
at June 30, 2020 |
971 |
|
|
$ |
5.56 |
|
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
4.5 |
Exercisable |
971 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number
of warrants |
|
Weighted
average exercise price |
|
Weighted
average grant date fair value |
|
Weighted
average remaining contractual term (years) |
Outstanding
at December 31, 2020 |
971 |
|
|
$ |
5.56 |
|
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
4 |
Granted |
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
Exercised |
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
Outstanding
at June 30, 2021 |
971 |
|
|
$ |
5.56 |
|
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
3.5 |
Exercisable |
971 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
Company recognized $0
of expense for the three months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020, and
$15.0
million and $0
of expense for the six months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
Public
Warrants and Private Warrants
Upon
the closing of the Business Combination, there were approximately 5.9 million
outstanding public and private warrants to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock that were issued by ROCH prior to the Business
Combination. Each whole warrant entitles the registered holder to purchase one
whole share of the Company’s Common Stock at a price of $11.50
per share, subject to adjustment as discussed below, at the later of the closing of the Business Combination or one year after ROCH’s
initial public offering, provided that the Company has an effective registration statement under the Securities Act covering the shares
of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of the warrants and a current prospectus relating to them is available and such shares are registered,
qualified or exempt from registration under the securities, or blue sky, laws of the state of residence of the holder. Pursuant to the
warrant agreement, a warrant holder may exercise its warrants only for a whole number of shares of Common Stock. The warrants will expire
five
years after the completion of the Business Combination, or earlier upon redemption or liquidation. The private warrants
are identical to the public warrants, except that the private warrants and the common stock issuable upon exercise of the private warrants
were not transferable, assignable or salable until after the completion of an Initial Business Combination, subject to certain limited
exceptions. Additionally, the private warrants are non-redeemable so long as they are held by the initial holder or any of its permitted
transferees. If the private warrants are held by someone other than the initial holder or its permitted transferees, the private warrants
will be redeemable by the Company and exercisable by such holders on the same basis as the public warrants.
The
Company may redeem the outstanding warrants in whole, but not in part, at a price of $0.01
per warrant upon a minimum of 30
days’ prior written notice of redemption, if and only if the last sale price of the Company’s common stock equals or exceeds
$18.00
per share for any 20-trading
days within a 30-trading
day period ending three
business days before the Company sends the notice of redemption to the warrant holders. If the Company calls the
PureCycle
Technologies, Inc.
NOTES
TO THE INTERIM CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – CONTINUED
(Unaudited)
warrants
for redemption, management will have the option to require all holders that wish to exercise the warrants to do so on a cashless basis.
In no event will the Company be required to net cash settle the warrant exercise. The public warrants are accounted for as equity classified
warrants as they were determined to be indexed to the Company’s stock and meet the requirements for equity classification.
The Company has classified
the private warrants as a warrant liability as there is a provision within the warrant agreement that allows for private warrants to be
exercised via a cashless exercise while held by the Sponsor and affiliates of the Sponsor, but would not be exercisable at any time on
a cashless basis if transferred and held by another investor. Therefore, the Company will classify the private warrants as a liability
pursuant to ASC 815 until the private warrants are transferred from the initial purchasers or any of their permitted transferees.
At June 30, 2021, there
were approximately 5.7 million
Public Warrants and 0.2 million
Private Placement warrants outstanding. Refer to Note 12 – Fair Value of Financial Instruments for further information.
NOTE
7 - RELATED
PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Innventure
LLC (“Innventure”) had a significant ownership stake in Legacy PCT. Innventure, in turn, was majority owned by Innventure1.
WE-INN LLC (“WE-INN”) held a minority interest in Innventure, and WE-INN is majority owned by Wasson Enterprises.
Innventure
held significant interests in the following legal entities: Innventure Management Services LLC, Innventure GP LLC, and Aeroflexx LLC.
Innventure had a significant financial interest over each of the legal entities within the group and had decision-making ability over
the group whereby significant managerial and operational support was provided by Innventure personnel. This includes certain executive
management and officers of Legacy PCT and other legal entities that were employees or officers of Innventure. The legal entities, including
Legacy PCT, were deemed to be under common control by Innventure. There were no transactions between Legacy PCT and its affiliates, Innventure
GP LLC and Aeroflexx LLC, during the six months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020.
Innventure
Management Services LLC provided significant managerial support to the other legal entities below Innventure, including Legacy PCT.
Management
services
During
the six months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020, PureCycle reimbursed Innventure Management Services LLC for certain expenses incurred on
its behalf. The Company paid $66 thousand
and $85 thousand
to Innventure Management Services LLC related to this arrangement for the three months ended June 30, 2021
and
2020, respectively,
and $121 thousand
and $187 thousand
for the six months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively. These amounts were included in selling, general and administrative expenses
in the condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive loss. As of June 30, 2021, and December 31, 2020, the Company owed
Innventure Management Services LLC $37 thousand
and $30
thousand, respectively, related to this arrangement, which is classified as accounts payable in the accompanying condensed consolidated
balance sheets.
Related
party receivables
In
2020, the Company prepaid certain tax payments on behalf of unitholders. As of June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020 the receivable
balance was $78
thousand recorded in prepaid expenses and other current assets in the condensed consolidated balance sheets.
Leases
The
Company provides office space to, and is reimbursed for, the rent by Innventure LLC.
NOTE
8 – NET
LOSS PER SHARE
The
Company follows the two-class method when computing net loss per common share when shares are issued that meet the definition of participating
securities. The two-class method requires income available to common shareholders for the period to be allocated between common and participating
securities based upon their
PureCycle
Technologies, Inc.
NOTES
TO THE INTERIM CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – CONTINUED
(Unaudited)
respective
rights to receive dividends as if all income for the period had been distributed. The two-class method also requires losses for the period
to be allocated between common and participating securities based on their respective rights if the participating security contractually
participates in losses. As holders of participating securities do not have a contractual obligation to fund losses, undistributed net
losses are not allocated to nonvested restricted stock for purposes of the loss per share calculation.
As
result of the reverse recapitalization, the Company has retroactively adjusted the weighted average shares outstanding prior to the Business
Combination to give effect to the Exchange Ratio used to determine the number of shares of common stock into which they were converted.
Presented
in the table below is a reconciliation of the numerator and denominator for the basic and diluted earnings per share (“EPS”)
calculations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020 (in thousands, except per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three
months ended June 30, |
|
Six
months ended June 30, |
|
2021 |
|
2020 |
|
2021 |
|
2020 |
Numerator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income (loss) attributable to PureCycle Technologies |
$ |
(15,277) |
|
|
$ |
(4,415) |
|
|
$ |
(45,397) |
|
|
$ |
(8,979) |
|
Less
cumulative earnings to preferred stockholder |
— |
|
|
787 |
|
|
— |
|
|
3,951 |
|
Net
income (loss) attributable to common stockholders |
$ |
(15,277) |
|
|
$ |
(5,202) |
|
|
$ |
(45,397) |
|
|
$ |
(12,930) |
|
Denominator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
average common shares outstanding, basic and diluted |
117,346 |
|
|
27,156 |
|
|
84,284 |
|
|
27,156 |
|
Net
loss per share attributable to common stockholder, basic and diluted |
$ |
(0.13) |
|
|
$ |
(0.19) |
|
|
$ |
(0.54) |
|
|
$ |
(0.48) |
|
The
weighted-average outstanding common share equivalents were excluded from the computation of diluted net loss per share attributable to
common stockholders for the periods presented because including them would have been anti-dilutive. These shares include vested but not
exercised warrants and non-vested restricted stock units and convertible notes.
NOTE
9 – PROPERTY,
PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
Presented
in the table below are the major classes of property, plant and equipment by category as of the below dates:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As
of June 30, 2021 |
(in
thousands) |
Cost |
|
Accumulated
Depreciation |
|
Net
Book Value |
Building |
$ |
12,029 |
|
|
$ |
541 |
|
|
$ |
11,488 |
|
Machinery
and equipment |
16,106 |
|
|
3,206 |
|
|
12,900 |
|
Fixtures
and Furnishings |
104 |
|
|
30 |
|
|
74 |
|
Land
improvements |
150 |
|
|
7 |
|
|
143 |
|
Land |
1,150 |
|
|
— |
|
|
1,150 |
|
Construction
in process |
112,656 |
|
|
— |
|
|
112,656 |
|
Total
property, plant and equipment |
$ |
142,195 |
|
|
$ |
3,784 |
|
|
$ |
138,411 |
|
PureCycle
Technologies, Inc.
NOTES
TO THE INTERIM CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – CONTINUED
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As
of December 31, 2020 |
(in
thousands) |
Cost |
|
Accumulated
Depreciation |
|
Net
Book Value |
Building |
$ |
12,029 |
|
|
$ |
387 |
|
|
$ |
11,642 |
|
Machinery
and equipment |
15,982 |
|
|
2,388 |
|
|
13,594 |
|
Fixtures
and Furnishings |
104 |
|
|
22 |
|
|
82 |
|
Land
improvements |
150 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
147 |
|
Land |
1,150 |
|
|
— |
|
|
1,150 |
|
Construction
in process |
43,603 |
|
|
— |
|
|
43,603 |
|
Total
property, plant and equipment |
$ |
73,018 |
|
|
$ |
2,800 |
|
|
$ |
70,218 |
|
Depreciation
expense is recorded within operating costs in the condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive loss and amounted to $985
thousand and $934
thousand for the six months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively, and $495
thousand and $469
thousand for the three months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
NOTE
10 – DEVELOPMENT
PARTNER ARRANGEMENTS
License
Agreements
On
October 16, 2015, Legacy PCT entered into a patent license agreement with P&G. The agreement outlines three
phases with specific deliverables for each phase. During Phase 1 of the agreement, P&G provides Legacy PCT with up to one
full-time employee to assist in the execution of Legacy PCT’s research and development activities. During Phase 2, P&G provides
up to two
full-time employees to assist in the execution of Legacy PCT’s research and development activities. In April 2019, Legacy PCT elected
to enter into Phase 3 of the agreement and prepaid a royalty payment in the amount of $2.0
million, which will be reduced against future royalties payable as sales occur. Phase 3 of the agreement relates to the commercial manufacture
period for the manufacture of the licensed product. This phase includes the construction of the first commercial plant for the manufacture
of the licensed product, details on the commercial sales capacity and the pricing of the licensed product to P&G and to third parties.
Where the Company has made royalty payments to its product development partners, the Company expenses such payments as incurred unless
it has determined that is it probable that such prepaid royalties have future economic benefit to the Company. In such cases prepaid royalties
will be reduced as royalties would otherwise be due to the partners. Effective January 1, 2021, the Company entered into an agreement
with P&G to provide certain research assistance through June 30, 2021. Under the terms of the agreement, the Company is obligated
to pay P&G $0.5 million
for such services.
As
of June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, the Company is in Phase 3 of the agreement and has recorded $2.0 million
within prepaid royalties and licenses in the condensed consolidated balance sheets.
On
November 13, 2019, Legacy PCT entered into a patent sublicense agreement with Impact Recycling Limited (“Impact”) through
the term of the patents. The agreement outlines an initial license fee of $2.5 million
and royalties on production using the license. In 2020, Legacy PCT paid $890 thousand
of the initial license fee, and during the six months ended June 30, 2021, the Company paid the remaining $1.6 million
of the initial fee. The initial license fee of $2.5 million
is recorded in Prepaid royalties and licenses in the condensed consolidated balance sheets and will be ratably amortized over the term
of the underlying patent using the straight-line method. In May 2021, the Company began using the technology covered by the Impact agreement
and commenced amortization as of this date.
Block
and Release Agreement
On
June 23, 2020, Legacy PCT entered into a block and release agreement with Total Petrochemicals & Refining S.A./N.V. (“Total”).
Upon execution of the agreement, Total made a prepayment consisting of a payment of $5.0 million
for future receipt of resin consisting of recycled polypropylene (“recycled PP”). The prepayment was placed in an escrow account
until the “release condition” of the Company closing the bond offering and overall capital funding of at least $370.0 million
has occurred. After the Company successfully raised the required capital,
PureCycle
Technologies, Inc.
NOTES
TO THE INTERIM CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – CONTINUED
(Unaudited)
the
$5.0 million
was released during the six months ended June 30, 2021 to the Company and recorded as deferred revenue in the condensed consolidated balance
sheets.
Strategic
Alliance Agreement
On
December 13, 2018, Legacy PCT entered into a strategic alliance agreement with Nestec Ltd. (“Nestle”), which expires on December
31, 2023. Upon execution of the agreement, Nestle committed to provide $1.0
million to Legacy PCT to fund further research and development efforts. The funding provided by Nestle may be convertible, in whole or
in part, into a prepaid product purchase arrangement at Nestle’s option, upon the time of product delivery beginning in 2020. Additionally,
because the research and development efforts were not successful as of December 31, 2020, up to 50%
of the funding may be convertible into a 5-year
term loan obligation, payable to Nestle at an interest rate equivalent to the U.S. prime rate. As of the issuance of these statements,
Nestlé has not elected to convert any funding into a term loan.
Legacy PCT received the
funding from Nestle on January 8, 2019. The Company has recorded $1.0 million
as a Deferred research and development obligation as of June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020. Recognition related to the funding
received will be deferred until it is probable that Nestle will not exercise their option. If the prepaid product purchase option is exercised,
the obligation will be recognized as an adjustment to the transaction price of future product sales (e.g., net revenue presentation).
If the option is not exercised, or in the case of development efforts not being successful, any amounts not converted to a loan obligation
will be recognized as a reduction to research and development costs.
NOTE
11 - INCOME
TAXES
Historically,
Legacy PCT was a limited liability company which had elected to be treated as a partnership for income tax purposes. As such, the Company
was not directly liable for income taxes for federal purposes. As of the date of the Business Combination, the operations of the Company
ceased to be taxed as a partnership resulting in a change in tax status for federal and state income tax purposes. This change in tax
status requires immediate recognition of any deferred tax assets or liabilities as of the transaction date as the Company will now be
directly liable for income taxes. The recognition of these initial deferred balances, if any, would be recorded as additional tax expense
in the period of the transaction. In addition, the Company will accrue current and deferred tax expense based on ongoing activity from
that date.
The
Company has determined that any net deferred tax assets are not more likely than not to be realized in the future as of the date of the
change in tax status, and a full valuation allowance is required. In addition, the Company has determined that any current forecasted
operations would result in federal and state income tax losses which are also not more likely than not to be realized. As a result, for
the periods ended June 30, 2021 and 2020, the Company has reported tax expense of $0
and $0,
respectively.
As
a part of the initial and current period recognition, Management has also evaluated the Company’s tax positions, including their
status as a pass-through entity for federal and state tax purposes historically, and has determined that the Company has taken no uncertain
tax positions that require adjustment to the condensed consolidated interim financial statements for the respective periods.
NOTE
12 – FAIR
VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
Fair
value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants
at the measurement date and sets out a fair value hierarchy. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active
markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3). Inputs are broadly defined
as assumptions market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. Assets and liabilities carried at fair value are classified
and disclosed in one of the following three categories:
Level
1 - Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the reporting entity has the ability to access
at the measurement date.
PureCycle
Technologies, Inc.
NOTES
TO THE INTERIM CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – CONTINUED
(Unaudited)
Level
2 - Inputs other than quoted prices within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, and
fair value is determined through the use of models or other valuation methodologies
Level
3 - Inputs are unobservable for the asset or liability and include situations where there is little, if any, market activity for the asset
or liability. The inputs into the determination of fair value are based upon the best information in the circumstances and may require
significant management judgment or estimation.
Liabilities
measured and recorded at Fair Value on a recurring basis
As
of June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, the Company’s financial assets and liabilities measured and recorded at fair value
on a recurring basis were classified within the fair value hierarchy as follow (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June
30, 2021 |
December
31, 2020 |
|
Level
1 |
Level
2 |
Level
3 |
Total |
Level
1 |
Level
2 |
Level
3 |
Total |
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
paper, available for sale |
$ |
— |
|
$ |
96,896 |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
96,896 |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
— |
|
Corporate
Bonds, available for sale |
— |
|
97,649 |
|
— |
|
97,649 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
Municipal
bonds, available for sale |
— |
|
5,887 |
|
— |
|
5,887 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
Total
investments |
$ |
— |
|
$ |
200,432 |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
200,432 |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrant
liability: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RTI
warrants |
$ |
— |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
15,000 |
|
$ |
15,000 |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
— |
|
Private
warrants |
— |
|
— |
|
2,899 |
|
2,899 |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
Total
warrant liability |
$ |
— |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
17,899 |
|
$ |
17,899 |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
— |
|
Measurement
of the Private Warrants
The private warrants are
measured at fair value on a recurring basis using a Black-Scholes model. The
private warrants are classified as Level 3 for both initial measurement upon close of the Business Combination and subsequent measurement
using the following assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June
30, 2021 |
March
18, 2021 (Initial Recognition) |
Expected
annual dividend yield |
— |
% |
— |
% |
Expected
volatility |
46.4 |
% |
47.3 |
% |
Risk-free
rate of return |
0.81 |
% |
0.86 |
% |
Expected
option term (years) |
4.72 |
5.0 |
The
aggregate values of the private warrants were $2.9 million
and $4.6 million
on June 30, 2021 and March 18, 2021, respectively.
PureCycle
Technologies, Inc.
NOTES
TO THE INTERIM CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – CONTINUED
(Unaudited)
A
summary of the private warrants activity from the Business Combination date at March 18, 2021 to June 30, 2021 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair
value (Level 3) |
Balance
at March 18, 2021 |
$ |
4,604 |
|
Change
in fair value |
(1,705) |
|
Balance
at June 30, 2021 |
$ |
2,899 |
|
Refer
to Note 6 – Warrants for further information.
Measurement of the RTI
warrants
Significant
changes in any of the significant unobservable inputs in isolation would not result in a materially different fair value estimate. The
interrelationship between these inputs is insignificant.
The
Company has determined its warrant to be a Level 3 fair value measurement and has remeasured using the Black-Scholes option pricing model
to calculate its fair value as of June 30, 2021 using the following assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected
annual dividend yield |
— |
% |
Expected
volatility |
48.51 |
% |
Risk-free
rate of return |
0.56 |
% |
Expected
option term (years) |
3.75 |
The
Company has an option to repurchase the Warrants at any time. The maximum fair value of the Warrants is limited by the fair value of the
repurchase option, which cannot exceed $15.0 million.
Changes
in Level 3 liabilities measured at fair value for six months ended June 30, 2021 are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair
value
(Level
3) |
Balance
at December 31, 2020 |
$ |
— |
|
Change
in fair value |
15,000 |
|
Balance
at June 30, 2021 |
$ |
15,000 |
|
Assets
and liabilities recorded at carrying value
In
determining the appropriate levels, the Company performs a detailed analysis of the assets and liabilities that are subject to fair value
measurements.
The
Company records cash and cash equivalents and accounts payable at cost, which approximates fair value due to their short-term nature or
stated rates. The Company records debt at cost.
NOTE
13 - AVAILABLE-FOR-SALE
INVESTMENTS
The
Company classifies its investments in debt securities as available-for-sale. Debt securities are comprised of highly liquid investments
with minimum “A” rated securities and, as of June 30, 2021, consist of corporate entity commercial paper and securities
and municipal bonds. The debt securities are reported at fair value with unrealized gains or losses recorded in accumulated other comprehensive
income in the condensed consolidated balance sheets. Refer to Note 12, "Fair Value Measurements," for information related to the fair
value measurements and valuation methods utilized.
PureCycle
Technologies, Inc.
NOTES
TO THE INTERIM CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – CONTINUED
(Unaudited)
The following table represents
the Company’s available-for-sale investments by major security type as of June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June
30, 2021 |
|
Amortized
Cost |
|
Gross
Unrealized Gains |
|
Gross
Unrealized Losses |
|
Total
Fair Value |
Commercial
Paper |
$ |
96,914 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
(20) |
|
|
$ |
96,896 |
|
Corporate
Bonds |
97,729 |
|
|
— |
|
|
(80) |
|
|
97,649 |
|
Municipal
Bonds |
5,895 |
|
|
— |
|
|
(8) |
|
|
5,887 |
|
Total |
$ |
200,538 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
(108) |
|
|
$ |
200,432 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December
31, 2020 |
|
Amortized
Cost |
|
Gross
Unrealized Gains |
|
Gross
Unrealized Losses |
|
Total
Fair Value |
Commercial
Paper |
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
Corporate
Bonds |
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
Municipal
Bonds |
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
Total |
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
The following table summarizes
the fair value and amortized cost bases of the Company’s available-for-sale investments by contractual maturity of June 30,
2021 and December 31, 2020 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June
30, 2021 |
|
December
31, 2020 |
|
Amortized
Cost |
|
Fair
Value |
|
Amortized
Cost |
|
Fair
Value |
Due
within one year |
$ |
136,315 |
|
|
$ |
136,278 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
Due
after one year through five years |
64,223 |
|
|
64,154 |
|
|
— |
|
|
— |
|
Total |
$ |
200,538 |
|
|
$ |
200,432 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
Debt
securities as of June 30, 2021 had an average remaining maturity of 0.9
years.
The Company reviews available-for-sale
investments for other-than-temporary impairment loss periodically. The Company considers factors such as the duration, severity and the
reason for the decline in value, the potential recovery period and our intent to sell. For debt securities, we also consider whether (i)
it is more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell the debt securities before recovery of their amortized cost basis
and (ii) the amortized cost basis cannot be recovered as a result of credit losses. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2021
and 2020, the Company did not
recognize any other-than-temporary impairment losses. All marketable securities with unrealized losses have been in a loss position for
less than twelve months, and the Company does not anticipate any material losses upon maturity of these investments. The fair value for
fixed-rate debt securities is based on quoted market prices for the same or similar debt instruments and is classified as Level 2. The
fair value for the Company's other securities holdings, primarily under commercial paper, equals the carrying value and is classified
as Level 2.
PureCycle
Technologies, Inc.
NOTES
TO THE INTERIM CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – CONTINUED
(Unaudited)
NOTE
14 - CONTINGENCIES
Legal
Proceedings
Beginning
on or about May 11, 2021, two
putative class action complaints were filed against PCT, certain senior members of management and others, asserting violations of federal
securities laws under Section 10(b) and Section 20(a) of the Exchange Act. The complaints generally allege that the applicable defendants
made false and/or misleading statements in press releases and public filings regarding the Technology, PCT’s business and PCT’s
prospects. The first putative class action complaint was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida by William
C. Theodore against PCT and certain senior members of management (the “Theodore Lawsuit”). The second putative class action
complaint was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida by David Tennenbaum against PCT, certain senior members
of management and others (the “Tennenbaum Lawsuit” and, together with the Theodore Lawsuit, the “Lawsuits”). The
plaintiffs in the Lawsuits seek to represent a class of investors who purchased or otherwise acquired PCT’s securities between November
16, 2020 and May 5, 2021. The plaintiffs in the Tennenbaum Lawsuit also seek to represent a class of all holders of ROCH CH Acquisition
I Co. securities entitled to participate in the March 16, 2021 shareholder vote on the Business Combination. The complaints seek certification
of the alleged class and compensatory damages. The Theodore Lawsuit also seeks punitive damages. The complaints rely on information included
in a research report published by Hindenburg Research LLC. The time for the applicable defendants to answer, move or otherwise respond
has not yet been scheduled. On July 14, 2021, the court granted a motion to consolidate the Lawsuits and on July 26, 2021, Tennenbaum
filed a motion to voluntarily dismiss his complaint without prejudice. On August 5, 2021, the Court entered an order identifying the Ciecko
Brothers as Co-Lead Plaintiffs (“Lead Plaintiffs”) and Pomerantz LLP as Lead Counsel. The Lead Plaintiffs will be required
to file a consolidated amended complaint on or before September 21, 2021. Defendants will be required to answer or otherwise plead within
45 days following the filing of the Lead Plaintiffs’ consolidated amended complaint. PCT and the individual defendants constituting
senior members of management intend to vigorously defend the Lawsuits. Given the stage of the litigation, PCT cannot reasonably estimate
at this time whether there will be any loss, or if there is a loss, the possible range of loss, that may arise from the unresolved Lawsuits.
NOTE
15 - SUBSEQUENT
EVENTS
In
connection with the preparation of the condensed consolidated interim financial statements for the period ended June 30, 2021, management
has evaluated events through August 12, 2021 to determine whether any events required recognition or disclosure in the condensed
consolidated interim financial statements. The following subsequent events were identified through the date of these condensed consolidated
interim financial statements:
On July 8, 2021, the Compensation
Committee (the “Committee”) of the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of the Company and, solely as it relates to
the principal executive officer, the Board, approved an annual short-term cash incentive program for fiscal 2021 (the “STIP”)
and a long-term equity-based incentive program for fiscal 2021 (the “LTIP”), including awards to the Company’s principal
executive officer, principal financial officer and other named executive officer (the “Named Executives”) thereunder. On July
8, 2021, PCT issued 2.6 million
RSU and performance share awards to employees of the Company under these programs. On August 11, 2021, the Board approved the issuance
of 38 thousand
RSU awards to the non-employee members of the Board.
On
July 29, 2021, PCT reached an agreement with The Augusta Economic Development Authority to build its first U.S. cluster facility —
The Augusta Facility — to produce UPRP from waste polypropylene. PCT expects the approximately 200-acre
location in Augusta Corporate Park to ultimately produce up to 650 million
pounds/year when fully operational.
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The
following discussion and analysis provides information which PCT’s management believes is relevant to an assessment and understanding
of PCT’s consolidated results of operations and financial condition. The discussion should be read together with the unaudited condensed
consolidated interim financial statements, together with related notes thereto, included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
This discussion may contain forward-looking statements based upon current expectations that involve risks, uncertainties, and assumptions.
Our actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including
those set forth under “Risk Factors” elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Unless the context otherwise requires,
references in this “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” to “we”,
“us”, “our”, and “the Company” are intended to mean the business and operations of PCT and its consolidated
subsidiaries.
Overview
PCT
is commercializing a patented purification recycling technology (the “Technology”), originally developed by P&G, for restoring
waste polypropylene into resin with near-virgin characteristics. We call this resin ultra-pure recycled polypropylene (“UPRP”),
which has nearly identical properties and applicability for reuse as virgin polypropylene. PCT has a global license for the Technology
from P&G. We are currently building our first commercial-scale plant in Ironton, Ohio, which is expected to have nameplate capacity
of approximately 107 million pounds/year when fully operational. Production is expected to commence in late 2022 and the plant is expected
to be fully operational in 2023. We have contracted all of the feedstock and offtake for this initial plant. We have recently reached
an agreement with The Augusta Economic Development Authority to build our first U.S. cluster facility — the Augusta Facility —
to produce UPRP from waste polypropylene. We expect the approximately 200-acre location n Augusta Corporate Park to ultimately produce
up to 650 million pounds/year when fully operational. We Our goal is to create an important new segment of the global polypropylene market
that will assist multinational entities in meeting their sustainability goals, provide consumers with polypropylene-based products that
are sustainable, and reduce overall polypropylene waste in the world’s landfills and oceans.
PCT
intends to build new recycling production facilities globally, with the goal of having approximately 30 commercial lines operational by
2030 and approximately 50 by 2035. In addition to our first plant in Ironton, Ohio, and our first cluster facility located in Augusta,
Georgia, we currently expect the next plants to be located in the United States, followed by Europe. The Augusta Facility will be our
first scaled up “cluster” site model. Pre-engineering for the design and installation of multiple commercial lines at the
Augusta Facility is currently underway and is expected to create efficiencies across the construction and permitting processes, as well
as reduce average capital expenditures per plant and reduce overall operating costs. From this next wave of expansion PCT expects to have
approximately 1.0 billion pounds of installed capacity by the end of 2024.
PCT
is regarded as a leader in polypropylene recycling and polymers sustainability. The Company's Feedstock Evaluation Unit (“FEU”),
which has been operational since July of 2019, is a smaller scale replica of the commercial-scale plant in Ironton, Ohio (the “Phase
II Facility”) currently under construction. The FEU was designed to simulate commercial production and validate for PCT’s
customers and suppliers the viability of our process, which has helped PCT secure 20+ year signed offtake agreements and supply agreements
with blue chip partners and industry players. Since the commissioning of the FEU, PCT has successfully processed approximately 145 feedstocks
from the US and Europe and produced recycled polypropylene nearly identical to virgin polypropylene.
The
Technology has been evaluated by third parties with a focus on the Technology's efficacy and commercial scalability. Certain of our strategic
partners have conducted testing on PCT's UPRP. In these evaluations, PCT's UPRP compared favorably to virgin polypropylene in common Food
& Beverage industry benchmarks for melt flow and mechanical properties, purity, and function (lift decay, hinge break, and impact
resistance).
The
Business Combination
On
March 17, 2021, PureCycle consummated the previously announced business combination (“Business Combination”) by and among
Roth CH Acquisition I Co., a Delaware corporation (“ROCH”), Roth CH Acquisition I Co. Parent Corp., a Delaware corporation
and wholly owned direct subsidiary of ROCH (“ParentCo”), Roth CH Merger Sub LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and
wholly owned direct subsidiary of Parent Co, Roth CH Merger Sub Corp., a Delaware corporation and wholly owned direct subsidiary of Parent
Co and PureCycle
Technologies
LLC (“PCT LLC”) pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of November 16, 2020, as amended from time to time (the
“Merger Agreement”).
Upon
the completion of the Business Combination and the other transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement (the “Transactions”,
and such completion, the “Closing”), ROCH changed its name to PureCycle Technologies Holdings Corp. and became a wholly owned
direct subsidiary of ParentCo, PCT LLC became a wholly owned direct subsidiary of PureCycle Technologies Holdings Corp. and a wholly owned
indirect subsidiary of ParentCo, and ParentCo changed its name to PureCycle Technologies, Inc.
The
Business Combination was accounted for as a reverse recapitalization and ROCH was treated as the “acquired” company for accounting
purposes. The Business Combination was accounted as the equivalent of Legacy PCT issuing units for the net assets of ROCH, accompanied
by a recapitalization. Accordingly, all historical financial information presented in these condensed consolidated interim financial statements
represents the accounts of Legacy PCT “as if” Legacy PCT is the predecessor to the Company. The units and net loss per unit,
prior to the Business Combination, have been adjusted to share amounts reflecting the exchange ratio established in the Business Combination.
Business
Highlights
We
are a pre-commercial company and our future financial condition and operating performance will depend on our ability to successfully begin,
sustain and expand the manufacturing and sale of UPRP, as discussed below, which in turn is subject to significant risks and challenges,
including, but not limited to, those described in the section of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q titled “Risk Factors.”
According
to the 2017 United States National Postconsumer Plastic Bottle Recycling Report published by The Association of Plastic Recyclers and
the American Chemistry Council, global demand for virgin or near-virgin polypropylene is expected to exceed 200.0 billion pounds by 2024,
of which approximately 27% is expected to come from the United States. However, less than 1% of U.S. polypropylene was recycled as of
2019 according to the American Chemistry Council.
We
apply a unique resin purification process to produce near-virgin quality polypropylene resin using waste polypropylene feedstock. The
physical purification process separates colors, contaminants and odors from waste polypropylene to achieve a potentially “food grade”
product while also expanding the range of feedstock quality in comparison to traditional polypropylene recycling.
P&G,
which designed and owns the patents to the Technology for manufacturing UPRP, granted us an exclusive, worldwide license to their patents
and other intellectual property for the manufacture of recycled polypropylene (the “License Agreement”). The License Agreement
was granted for the duration of the relevant patents and we, in turn, granted back a limited sublicense to P&G for the same period,
including to any intellectual property Improvements (as defined in the License Agreement) made by us, allowing P&G to produce or sublicense
the production of up to a certain amount of UPRP worldwide per year for a set period of time and up to a certain higher threshold of UPRP
per region (the License Agreement defines six separate geographic regions) per year thereafter. The exclusivity period terminates with
the last to expire of the licensed patents. Patents expire at or near twenty years from their earliest effective filing date in the United
States Patent and Trademark Office. The first of the licensed patents was filed in June 2016 and has an expected expiration date of June
2036. The most recent patents were filed in 2019 and expire in 2039.
P&G
has the right to purchase UPRP, at “the most favored nation” pricing, from the Phase II Facility in its first year of operations
at a guaranteed minimum amount and a guaranteed minimum amount each year thereafter. Following the opening of our second plant in Augusta,
Georgia, P&G will have the right to annually purchase a certain amount or maximum percentage of our total manufacturing capacity each
year, whichever is greater. The License Agreement provides for royalties to P&G on production sold to third parties, with the royalty
rate upon commencement of production ranging from 0.25% to 7.0% driven by the number of plants, product pricing and time. Pursuant to
the License Agreement, we prepaid a portion of this royalty amount in April 2019. The License Agreement may be subject to stepped up royalty
rates, become non-exclusive or become subject to termination by P&G in certain circumstances, including if we fail to meet mutually
agreeable resin technical specifications within six months of the start of operations at the Phase II Facility, are unable or unwilling
to provide P&G with the aforementioned UPRP offtake quantity on terms specified in the License Agreement, if we fail to pay required
royalties or upon a change of control (excluding the Business Combination).
Additionally,
P&G has the right to produce or sublicense the production of UPRP using its technology, which may cause us to come into competition
with P&G or its sublicensees. In the event this takes place, these companies will have access to the same technology and may not be
subject to royalties or may enjoy preferential royalty terms. Competition may drive down pricing and, to the extent such future competitors
are able to produce UPRP more efficiently than we are, our margins and profits could be adversely affected. In addition, any breach by
us of certain terms of the License Agreement may entitle P&G to terminate the License Agreement or make it non-exclusive, which would
have a material and adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Effective
January 1, 2021, we entered into an agreement with P&G to provide certain research assistance through June 30, 2021. Under the terms
of the agreement, we are obligated to pay P&G $0.5 million for such services.
Multiple
large corporations have specifically committed to reducing their plastics footprint, resulting in premium pricing for recycled polypropylene
relative to its virgin counterpart. PCT has entered into legally binding offtake agreements with three blue-chip customers for the purchase
of UPRP from the production expected at the Phase II Facility at premium prices relative to virgin polypropylene. These commitments account
for a minimum of 47.5 million pounds of the Phase II Facility’s annual production capacity. Combined with the three additional secured
offtake agreements, a minimum of 63 million pounds of total capacity is committed, up to a quantity of 138 million pounds per year at
PCT’s sole option. The terms of these offtake agreements range from 3 to 7 years and we have entered into several offtake letters
of intent with other potential customers. We have also secured the feedstock required to run the Phase II Facility at its 107 million
pounds nameplate capacity for at least the first 3 years.
Pursuant
to one binding offtake term sheet with a blue-chip customer, entered into on April 22, 2020 (and subsequently amended, the “Pre-Purchase
Term Sheet”), PCT and PCO agreed to work in good faith with a third party to finalize an Offtake Agreement. On March 16, 2021, PCT
received a $5 million pre-payment under the Pre-Purchase Term Sheet for future receipt of UPRP meeting certain purity, color and other
technical specifications set forth in the Pre-Purchase Term Sheet. Additionally, PCT and PCO agreed to allocate to, and at the option
of, the Pre-Purchase Term Sheet’s counterparty, between five to eight million pounds of UPRP over each of the next 20 years. Furthermore,
the Pre-Purchase Term Sheet provides for the reimbursement of the $5 million pre-payment upon PCT’s failure to (1) proceed with
the construction and commissioning of the Phase II Facility; (2) begin commercial production and delivery of UPRP by January 2, 2023 and
(3) provide the counterparty with certain agreed-upon rebate payments (the “Reimbursement”). Lastly, PCT and PCO agreed not
to enter into any strategic partnership agreement or offtake agreement with a competitor of the Purchase Term Sheet’s counterparty
until the fourth quarter of 2021, six months after the counterparty’s subsequent receipt of UPRP. Innventure LLC (then known as
We-Innventure LLC), unconditionally guaranteed PCT’s obligation to make the Reimbursement pursuant to a separate guaranty entered
into with the Pre-Purchase Term Sheet counterparty on April 22, 2020.
Completion
of the Phase II Facility and Expansion of Our Manufacturing Footprint
Construction
of our first manufacturing plant, the “Phase II Facility” or “Plant 1,” began in October 2020. The plant is on
the 26-acre site of a former Dow Chemical plant near the Ohio River and close to rail, highway and barge transportation. We expect the
Phase II Facility to be commercially operational by the end of 2022, with an annual production capacity of 107 million pounds expected
by 2023.
Our
initial testing production line — the Feedstock Evaluation Unit (“FEU” or “Phase I Facility”) — was
developed to test and optimize the efficiency and throughput of our recycling process, was completed in July 2019 and will remain a critical
component for testing feedstock for polypropylene content. The next phase is to construct, renovate, equip and install an approximately
150,000 square foot facility housing commercial-scale equipment including the repurposing of a number of existing buildings for feedstock
pre-processing, feedstock storage, and utilities. An additional building has been leased for feedstock pre-processing research and development.
As of June 30, 2021, we estimate the remaining capital to complete the Phase II Facility at approximately $183.9 million. We do not currently
anticipate any additional capital required to complete Plant 1 in Ironton.
The
timely completion of our construction of the Phase II Facility depends on several factors, some of which are outside of our control. We
have contracted the construction to several third parties. One contractor will repurpose existing buildings, another will construct the
core purification process equipment, and several others will supply certain pre-processing equipment. In addition, PCT is required to
obtain or modify certain additional construction permits for the timely completion of the Phase II Facility.
While
our contractors are subject to performance guarantees that equipment will be free from defects for 12 months and PCT’s key contractors
are subject to delay damage liability in the event that the Phase II Facility is not delivered by the fourth quarter of 2022, there is
no assurance that the Phase II Facility will be completed at our anticipated cost, that it will become operational on our anticipated
timeline, or that any indemnity for delay will be sufficient to compensate us for the consequences of the defect or delay, such as the
termination of or loss of exclusivity under the License Agreement. In the event that the Phase II Facility is completed above anticipated
cost then PCT is responsible for construction cost overruns.
In
addition, on July 29, 2021, PCT reached an agreement with The Augusta Economic Development Authority to build its first U.S. cluster facility
— the Augusta Facility — to produce UPRP from waste polypropylene. PCT expects the approximately 200-acre location in Augusta
Corporate Park to ultimately produce up to 650 million pounds/year when fully operational.
Basis
of Presentation
The
accompanying condensed consolidated interim financial statements include the accounts of the Company. The condensed consolidated interim
financial statements are presented in U.S. Dollars. Certain information in footnote disclosures normally included in annual financial
statements was condensed or omitted for the interim periods presented in accordance with the rules and regulations of the U.S. Securities
and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) and accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S.
GAAP”). Intercompany balances and transactions were eliminated upon consolidation. These condensed consolidated interim financial
statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes of ROCH and Legacy PCT for
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020 as filed in our Form S-1 on March 8, 2021. The results of operations for the six months ended
June 30, 2021 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the entire year ending December 31, 2021. The accompanying
condensed consolidated interim financial statements reflect all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, that are, in
the opinion of management, necessary to present a fair statement of the results for the interim periods presented.
Components
of Results of Operations
Revenue
To
date, we have not generated any operating revenue. We expect to begin to generate revenue by the end of 2022, which is when we expect
the Phase II Facility to become commercially operational.
Operating
Costs
Operating
expenses to date have consisted mainly of personnel costs (including wages, salaries and benefits) and other costs directly related to
operations at the Phase I Facility, including rent, depreciation, repairs and maintenance, utilities and supplies. Costs attributable
to the design and development of the Phase II Facility are capitalized and will be depreciated over the useful life of the Phase II Facility,
which we expect to be approximately 40 years. We expect our operating costs to increase substantially as we continue to scale operations
and increase headcount.
Research
and Development Expense
Research
and development expenses consist primarily of costs related to the development of our facilities and licensed product. These include mainly
personnel costs and third-party consulting costs. In 2020 and 2021, our research and development expenses were related primarily to the
development of the Phase I Facility and design and development of our UPRP Process. We expect our research and development expenses to
increase for the foreseeable future as we increase investment in feedstock evaluation, including investment in new frontend feedstock
mechanical separators to improve feedstock purity and increase the range of feedstocks PCT can process economically. In addition, we are
increasing our in-house feedstock analytical capabilities, which will include additional supporting equipment and personnel.
Selling,
General and Administrative Expense
Selling,
general and administrative expenses consist primarily of personnel-related expenses for our corporate, executive, finance and other administrative
functions and professional services, including legal, audit and accounting services. We expect our selling, general, and administrative
expenses to increase for the foreseeable
future
as we scale headcount with the growth of our business, and as a result of operating as a public company, including compliance with the
rules and regulations of the SEC, legal, audit, additional insurance expenses, investor relations activities, and other administrative
and professional services.
Results
of Operations
Comparison
of three and six month periods ended June 30, 2021 and 2020
The
following table summarizes our operating results for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2021 and 2020:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three
Months Ended June 30, |
|
Six
Months Ended June 30, |
(in
thousands, except %) |
|
2021 |
|
2020 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
|
2021 |
|
2020 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
Costs
and expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
costs |
|
$ |
2,411 |
|
|
$ |
1,793 |
|
|
$ |
618 |
|
|
34 |
% |
|
$ |
4,541 |
|
|
$ |
3,476 |
|
|
$ |
1,065 |
|
|
31 |
% |
Research
and development |
|
224 |
|
|
9 |
|
|
215 |
|
|
2389 |
% |
|
771 |
|
|
357 |
|
|
414 |
|
|
116 |
% |
Selling,
general and administrative |
|
7,259 |
|
|
1,048 |
|
|
6,211 |
|
|
593 |
% |
|
14,883 |
|
|
2,286 |
|
|
12,597 |
|
|
551 |
% |
Total
operating costs and expenses |
|
9,894 |
|
|
2,850 |
|
|
7,044 |
|
|
247 |
% |
|
20,195 |
|
|
6,119 |
|
|
14,076 |
|
|
230 |
% |
Interest
expense |
|
6,054 |
|
|
597 |
|
|
5,457 |
|
|
914 |
% |
|
12,143 |
|
|
1,185 |
|
|
10,958 |
|
|
925 |
% |
Change
in fair value of warrants |
|
(359) |
|
|
1,120 |
|
|
(1,479) |
|
|
(132) |
% |
|
13,262 |
|
|
1,775 |
|
|
11,487 |
|
|
647 |
% |
Other
expense |
|
(312) |
|
|
(152) |
|
|
(160) |
|
|
105 |
% |
|
(203) |
|
|
(100) |
|
|
(103) |
|
|
103 |
% |
Net
loss |
|
$ |
15,277 |
|
|
$ |
4,415 |
|
|
$ |
10,862 |
|
|
246 |
% |
|
$ |
45,397 |
|
|
$ |
8,979 |
|
|
$ |
36,418 |
|
|
406 |
% |
Operating
Costs
The
increases for the three and six month periods were primarily attributable to an increase in repairs and maintenance costs of $0.2 million
and $0.5 million, higher personnel costs related to wages and salaries for increased operational staff at the Phase 1 Facility of $0.2
million and $0.4 million, and higher operational consulting costs related to the Phase 1 Facility of $0.3 million and $0.4 million, respectively.
Research
and Development Expenses
Research and development
expenses consist primarily of costs related to the development of our facilities and licensed product. These include mainly personnel
costs and third-party consulting costs. In 2020 and 2021, our research and development expenses were related primarily to the development
of the Phase II Facility and design and development of our UPRP Process. We expect our research and development expenses to increase for
the foreseeable future as we increase investment in feedstock evaluation, including investment in new front-end feedstock mechanical separators
to improve feedstock purity and increase the range of feedstocks PCT can process economically. In addition, we are increasing our in-house
feedstock analytical capabilities, which will include additional supporting equipment and personnel.
Selling,
General and Administrative Expenses
The
increases for the three and six month period were primarily attributable to increased wages and benefits related to new administrative
headcount of $3.1 million and $3.2 million, transaction-related expenses of $0 and $3.2 million, higher professional and legal services
expense primarily related to issuance of the Revenue Bonds, public company expenses, and other initiatives of $1.5 million and $4.3 million,
and increase in D&O insurance expense of $0.9 million and $0.9 million, respectively.
Interest
Expense
The
increase for the three and six month period was primarily attributable to interest on the Revenue Bonds and Convertible Notes of $5.5
million and $11.0 million, respectively.
Change
in fair value of warrants
The
decrease for the three month period was attributable to a $0.4 million decrease in fair value of the liability-classified RTI and private
warrants compared to a $1.1 million increase in fair value for the P&G warrants in 2020. The increase for the six month period was
attributable to a $13.3 million net increase in fair value of the liability-classified RTI and private warrants compared to a $1.8 million
increase in fair value of P&G warrants in 2020.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
We
have not yet begun commercial operations and we do not have any sources of revenue. Our ongoing operations have, to date, been funded
by a combination of equity financing through the issuance of units and debt financing through the issuance of Convertible Notes and Revenue
Bonds and the Closing of the Business Combination. As of June 30, 2021, we had cash and cash equivalents on hand of $338.6 million,
as well as $200.4 million of investment holdings in highly liquid debt securities and commercial paper with an average maturity of
less than one year. Of the total cash balance, $300.9 million is included in Restricted Cash on the Condensed Consolidated Balance
Sheet. This balance is restricted in terms of use based on the Loan Agreement and requires PCO to use the proceeds of the Revenue Bonds
exclusively to construct and equip the Phase II Facility, fund a debt service reserve fund for the Series 2020A Bonds, finance capitalized
interest, and pay the costs of issuing the Revenue Bonds. The following is a summary of the components of the Restricted Cash balance
as of June 30, 2021:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in
millions) |
June
30, 2021 |
|
Equity
Escrow Reserve |
$ |
50.0 |
|
represents
required equity reserves |
Capitalized
Interest Reserve |
43.8 |
|
represents
interest payments through 12/1/2023 |
Debt
Service Reserve |
21.0 |
|
represents
a portion of future principal payments |
Bond
Funds Available for Use for Ironton |
|
|
Ironton
Plant 1 Construction |
183.9 |
|
|
Letter
of Credit for Ironton Utilities |
2.1 |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Collateral
for Company Credit Cards |
0.1 |
|
|
|
$ |
300.9 |
|
|
PCT also had $313.6 million
in debt and accrued interest, less $20.0 million of discount and issuance costs, as of June 30, 2021.
Further,
in conjunction with the closing of the Business Combination, PCT received $326.0 million of gross proceeds related to the transaction
closing and the release of the PIPE investment funds. The gross proceeds were offset by $27.9 million of capitalized issuance costs.
The
proceeds and restricted cash described above are intended to be used for: construction of our Phase II Facility, which we currently estimate
has $160.2 million in remaining cost to complete, approximately $8 - 10 million related to designing and building PCT’s overall
global digital footprint, and for other general corporate purposes. Our future capital requirements will depend on many factors, including
actual construction costs for our Phase II Facility, the construction of additional plants, including the Augusta Facility, funding needs
to support our business growth and to respond to business opportunities, challenges or unforeseen circumstances. If our forecasts prove
inaccurate, we may be required to seek additional equity or debt financing from outside sources, which we may not be able to raise on
terms acceptable to us, or at all. If we are unable to raise additional capital when desired, our business, financial condition and results
of operations would be adversely affected.
Indebtedness
Convertible
Notes Offering
On
October 6, 2020, we entered into a Note Purchase Agreement (the “Note Purchase Agreement”) with certain funds managed by Magnetar
Capital LLC or its affiliates (“Magnetar Investors”), providing for the purchase of up to $60.0 million in aggregate principal
amount of our Convertible Senior Secured Notes due 2022 (the “Convertible
Notes”)
issuable under an indenture dated as of October 7, 2020 (the “Magnetar Indenture”) between us and U.S. Bank National Association,
as trustee and collateral agent.
On
October 7, 2020, we issued $48.0 million in aggregate principal amount of Convertible Notes (the “First Tranche Notes”).
On December 29, 2020, we issued $12.0 million in aggregate principal amount of Second Tranche Notes. In the event that the Business
Combination was not consummated within 180 days of the entry into the Merger Agreement, the Second Tranche Notes were subject to a special
mandatory redemption at a redemption price equal to 100% of their aggregate principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest.
In
connection with the Business Combination, we and each of our subsidiaries (the “Magnetar Guarantors”) was required to unconditionally
guarantee, on a senior basis, all of our obligations with respect of the Convertible Notes. The Convertible Notes are our senior obligations
and are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by the Magnetar Guarantors. On March 17, 2021, we entered into a supplemental indenture (the
“Second Supplemental Indenture”) with PureCycle Technologies LLC, PureCycle Technologies Holdings Corp., and U.S. Bank National
Association, as trustee and collateral agent, pursuant to which (i) we and PureCycle Technologies Holdings Corp. agreed to guarantee our
obligations under the Convertible Notes and (ii) we and PureCycle Technologies Holdings Corp. unconditionally assumed all of our obligations
under the Convertible Notes and the Magnetar Indenture relating to, among other things, our obligations relating to the authorization,
issuance and delivery of our common stock issuable upon conversion of the Convertible Notes.
Also,
in connection with the Closing of the Business Combination, the Liens on all Collateral that secured the Convertible Notes and the Note
Guarantees were automatically terminated and released (as such terms are defined in the Magnetar Indenture).
Also,
on March 17, 2021, we signed the Joinder Agreement (the “Joinder Agreement”) to the Note Purchase Agreement. The Joinder Agreement
made us a party to the Notes Purchase Agreement for purposes of the indemnification provisions therein. Execution of the Joinder Agreement
was a closing condition to the Merger Agreement.
Under
the Magnetar Indenture for the Convertible Notes, we and the Magnetar Guarantors will, subject to certain exceptions, be restricted from
incurring indebtedness that ranks senior in right of payment to the Convertible Notes and if we or the Magnetar Guarantors incur pari
passu indebtedness that
is secured by a lien, we and such Magnetar Guarantors are required to also provide an equal and ratable lien in favor of the holders of
the Convertible Notes. The Convertible Notes are subject to certain customary events of default.
Unless earlier converted,
redeemed or repurchased in accordance with the terms of the Magnetar Indenture, the Convertible Notes will mature on October 15, 2022,
subject to an extension that may be exercised at our sole discretion to April 15, 2023 with respect to 50% of the then outstanding Convertible
Notes. The Convertible Notes will bear interest from their date of issue at a rate of 5.875% per year, payable semi-annually in arrears
on April 15 and October 15 of each year, beginning on April 15, 2021. Interest on the Convertible Notes is payable, at our option, entirely
in cash or entirely in kind in the form of additional Convertible Notes. The first interest payment of $1,680,250 was due on April 15,
2021 and was paid entirely in kind, meaning that the principal amount of the Convertible Notes was increased by $1,680,250.
The Convertible Notes
are convertible at the option of the holders at any time, until the close of business on the business day immediately preceding the maturity
date. Following the consummation of the Business Combination, however, each holder was required to agree not to convert its Convertible
Notes (except in connection with a Change of Control or Fundamental Change (each as defined in the Magnetar Indenture)) for a period not
to exceed one hundred eighty (180) days following the consummation of the Business Combination, or September 13, 2021).
Following
the consummation of the Business Combination, the conversion rate per $1,000 principal amount of Convertible Notes is approximately 144.4:
the quotient of (A) $1,000 and (B) the SPAC Transaction PIPE valuation; provided that if the Equity Value of the Company in connection
with the SPAC Transaction is greater than $775.0 million, the conversion rate will equal the product of (1) the amount that would otherwise
be calculated pursuant to the clause set forth above and (2) a fraction equal to the Equity Value of the Company divided by $775.0 million
(as such terms are defined in the Magnetar Indenture). Immediately following the consummation of the Business Combination, 8,661,290 shares
of our Common Stock were issuable upon conversion of the Convertible Notes. Following the in kind payment of the first interest payment
for the Convertible Notes, which was made on April 15, 2021, 8,903,842 shares of our Common Stock were issuable upon conversion of the
Convertible Notes. Up to 951,360 additional shares of our Common Stock will be issuable upon conversion of the Convertible Notes
assuming
all remaining interest payments are made to holders of the Convertible Notes entirely in kind and the maturity date of the Convertible
Notes is extended through April 15, 2023 (from October 15, 2022) at our election with respect to 50% of the amount outstanding under the
Convertible Notes at October 15, 2022 (as described above).
In
connection with certain transactions resulting in a change of control (not including the Business Combination), the Convertible Notes
will be convertible at the option of the holders until the 35th business day following the change of control becoming effective at an
initial conversion rate equal to the quotient of $1,000 and 80% of the per share amount of consideration received by holders of common
stock in such change of control transaction. In each case, the conversion rate is subject to adjustment under certain circumstances, including
certain dilutive events, in accordance with the terms of the Magnetar Indenture.
If
certain fundamental change or change of control transactions occur with respect to us, holders of the Convertible Notes may require the
repurchase for cash of all or any portion of their Convertible Notes at a fundamental change repurchase price equal to 100% of the principal
amount of the Convertible Notes to be repurchased, plus accrued and unpaid interest to, but excluding, the repurchase date.
We
may not redeem the Convertible Notes at our option at any time, and no sinking fund is provided for by the Magnetar Indenture.
Cash
Flows
A
summary of our cash flows for the periods indicated is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six
Months Ended June 30, |
(in
thousands, except %) |
|
2021 |
|
2020 |
$ Change |
|
% Change |
Net
cash used in operating activities |
|
$ |
(42,982) |
|
|
$ |
(7,190) |
|
$ |
(35,792) |
|
|
498 |
% |
Net
cash used in investing activities |
|
(242,932) |
|
|
(1,557) |
|
(241,375) |
|
|
15,503 |
% |
Net
cash provided by financing activities |
|
293,914 |
|
|
9,874 |
|
284,040 |
|
|
2,877 |
% |
Cash
and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
|
330,574 |
|
|
150 |
|
330,424 |
|
|
220,283 |
% |
Cash
and cash equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
338,574 |
|
|
$ |
1,277 |
|
$ |
337,297 |
|
|
26,413 |
% |
Cash
Flows from Operating Activities
The
$35.8 million increase in net cash used in operating activities for the six months ending June 30, 2021 compared to the same period in
2020 was primarily attributable to the increase in transaction and other related payments that were paid as part of the Business Combination
of $13.9 million, additional interest paid of $10.8 million related to the Revenue Bonds, $3.4 million paid for D&O insurance, $5.6
million net impact related to increased employee costs, $1.6 million related to the Impact License agreement, and $5.5 million due to
higher professional, legal, and other costs, partially offset by the $5.0 million receipt of the Total pre-payment release.
Cash
Flows from Investing Activities
The
$241.4 million increase in net cash used in investing activities for the six months ending June 30, 2021 related to same period in 2020
was attributable to $200.7 million in purchases of available for sale debt securities and $40.7 million additional capital expenditure
payments related to construction of the Company’s Phase II Facility.
Cash
Flows from Financing Activities
The
$284.0 million increase in net cash provided by financing activities for the six months ending June 30, 2021 related to same period in
2020 was primarily attributable to $298.5 million from the closing of the Business Combination, net of capitalized issuance costs and
a decrease in payments to related parties of $2.9 million. This increase was offset by an increase in bond issuance costs paid of $4.1
million and a decrease in proceeds from issuance of Legacy PCT units of $12.5 million.
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
We
have no off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition,
changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that
is material to investors. We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements or interests in variable interest entities that would require
consolidation. Note that while certain legally binding offtake arrangements have been entered into with customers, these arrangements
are not unconditional and definitive agreements subject only to customary closing conditions, and do not qualify as off-balance sheet
arrangements required for disclosure.
Critical
Accounting Policies and Estimates
The
preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
amounts reported in the condensed consolidated interim financial statements and accompanying notes. Although these estimates are based
on the Company’s knowledge of current events and actions the Company may undertake in the future, actual results could differ from
those estimates and assumptions.
Income
Taxes
To
calculate the interim tax provision, at the end of each interim period the Company estimates the annual effective tax rate and applies
that to its ordinary quarterly earnings. The effect of changes in the enacted tax laws or rates is recognized in the interim period in
which the change occurs. The computation of the annual estimated effective tax rate at each interim period requires certain estimates
and judgments including, but not limited to, the expected operating income for the year, projections of the proportion of income earned
and taxed in other jurisdictions, permanent differences between book and tax amounts, and the likelihood of recovering deferred tax assets
generated in the current year. The accounting estimates used to compute the provision for income taxes may change as new events occur,
additional information is obtained, or the tax environment changes.
Furthermore,
in December 2019, the FASB issued ASU No. 2019-12, Income
Taxes: Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes (ASU
2019-12”). The new guidance affects general principles within Topic 740, Income
Taxes. The amendments
of ASU 2019-12 are meant to simplify and reduce the cost of accounting for income taxes. The Company adopted ASU 2019-12 during the first
quarter of 2021 using a prospective approach. The adoption of ASU 2019-12 did not have a material impact on the Company’s condensed
consolidated interim financial statements.
Equity-Based
Compensation
Legacy
PCT issued grants of Legacy PCT incentive units to select employees and service providers. The equity- based compensation cost for the
units is measured at the grant date based on the fair value of the award over the requisite service period, which is the vesting period
on the straight-line basis. In the event of modification, the Company recognizes the remaining compensation cost based on the grant date
fair value over the new requisite service period. The Company applies a zero-forfeiture rate for its equity-based awards, as such awards
have been granted to a limited number of employees and service providers. The Company revises the forfeiture rate prospectively as a change
in an estimate, when a significant forfeiture or an indication that significant forfeiture occurs.
In
connection with the Closing of the Business Combination, the Legacy PCT incentive units were converted into restricted stock of the Company.
The restricted stock awards maintain the same vesting schedules as the Legacy PCT incentive units.
The
fair value of the awards is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option- pricing model using the following assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021 |
|
2020 |
Expected
annual dividend yield |
0.0 |
% |
|
0.0 |
% |
Expected
volatility |
49.1 |
% |
|
42.1
- 63.3% |
Risk-free
rate of return |
0.1 |
% |
|
1.6
- 1.7% |
Expected
option term (years) |
0.2 |
|
0.75
- 4.4 |
The
expected term of the restricted stock granted is determined based on the period of time the awards are expected to be outstanding. The
risk-free rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant. The expected volatility was based on the Legacy
PCT’s capital structure and volatility of similar entities referred to as guideline companies. In determining similar entities,
Legacy PCT considered industry, stage of life cycle, size and financial leverage. The dividend yield is assumed to be zero since Legacy
PCT has not historically paid dividends. The fair value of the underlying Company shares for the three months ended June 30, 2021 was
determined using an initial public offering scenario. The fair value of Legacy PCT Units, for the three months ended June 30, 2020, was
determined using a hybrid method consisting of an option pricing method and an initial public offering scenario.
Warrants
The
Company measures the warrants issued to nonemployees at the fair value of the equity instruments issued as of the warrant issuance date
and recognizes that amount as selling, general, and administrative expense in accordance with the vesting terms of the warrant agreement.
In the event that the terms of the warrants qualify as a liability, the Company accounts for the instrument as a liability recorded at
fair value each reporting period through earnings.
The
Company has determined the warrants issued to RTI in connection with terms of a professional services agreement are equity classified.
Accordingly, the warrant units were held at their initial fair value with no subsequent remeasurement.
In
connection with the Business Combination discussed in Note 1, the Company modified the RTI warrant agreement to purchase 971.0 thousand
shares of PCT common stock instead of Legacy PCT Class C Units on November 20, 2020. RTI can exercise these warrants upon the first anniversary
of Closing of the Business Combination. The warrants expire on December 31, 2024. In connection with the closing of the Business Combination,
the Company determined the warrants issued are liability classified under ASC 480. Accordingly, the warrants will be held at their initial
fair value and remeasured at fair value at each subsequent reporting date with changes in the fair value presented in the statements of
comprehensive loss.
The
Company has determined its warrant to be a Level 3 fair value measurement and has used the Black-Scholes option pricing model to calculate
its fair value using the following assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected
annual dividend yield |
0 |
% |
Expected
volatility |
48.51
– 50.1% |
Risk-free
rate of return |
0.56 |
% |
Expected
option term (years) |
3.5
– 3.75 |
The
Company has determined the private warrants are liability classified. Accordingly, the warrants were held at their initial fair value
and remeasured at fair value at each subsequent reporting date with changes in the fair value presented in the statements of comprehensive
loss.
The Company has determined
these warrants to be a Level 3 fair value measurement and has used the Black-Scholes model to calculate their fair value using the following
assumptions, which are subject to judgement and could result in higher or lower changes in fair value based on the inputs selected:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June
30, 2021 |
March
18, 2021 (Initial Recognition) |
Expected
annual dividend yield |
— |
% |
— |
% |
Expected
volatility |
46.4 |
% |
47.3 |
% |
Risk-free
rate of return |
0.81 |
% |
0.86 |
% |
Expected
option term (years) |
4.72 |
5.0 |
Stock
Options
The
stock options issued pursuant to the Plan are time-based and vest over the period defined in each individual grant agreement or upon a
change of control event as defined in the Plan.
The
Company recognizes compensation expense for the shares equal to the fair value of the equity-based compensation awards and is recognized
on a straight-line basis over the vesting period of such awards. The fair value of the stock is estimated on the date of grant using the
Black-Scholes option-pricing model using the following assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2021 |
|
2020 |
Expected
annual dividend yield |
— |
% |
|
— |
% |
Expected
volatility |
47.5 |
% |
|
— |
% |
Risk-free
rate of return |
0.7 |
% |
|
— |
% |
Expected
option term (years) |
4.5 |
|
0.0 |
The
expected term of the shares granted is determined based on the period of time the shares are expected to be outstanding. The risk-free
rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant. The expected volatility was based on the Company’s
capital structure and volatility of similar entities referred to as guideline companies. In determining similar entities, the Company
considered industry, stage of life cycle, size and financial leverage. The dividend yield on the Company’s shares is assumed to
be zero as the Company has not historically paid dividends. The fair value of the underlying Company shares was determined using the Company’s
closing stock price on the grant date.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
See
Note 2 to the audited consolidated financial statements and unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements included elsewhere
in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for more information about recent accounting pronouncements, the timing of their adoption, and our
assessment, to the extent we have made one, of their potential impact on our financial condition and our results of operations.
Emerging
Growth Company Election
Section
102(b)(1) of the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012 (“JOBS Act”) exempts emerging growth companies from being required
to comply with new or revised financial accounting standards until private companies are required to comply with the new or revised financial
accounting standards. The JOBS Act provides that a company can choose not to take advantage of the extended transition period and comply
with the requirements that apply to non-emerging growth companies, and any such election to not take advantage of the extended transition
period is irrevocable.
PCT
is an “emerging growth company” as defined in Section 2(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and has elected to take
advantage of the benefits of the extended transition period for new or revised financial accounting standards. PCT expects to continue
to take advantage of the benefits of the extended transition period, although it may decide to early adopt such new or revised accounting
standards to the extent permitted by such standards. This may make it difficult or impossible to compare PCT’s financial results
with the financial results of another public company that is either not an emerging growth company or is an emerging growth company that
has chosen not to take advantage of the extended transition period exemptions because of the potential differences in accounting standards
used.
PCT
will remain an emerging growth company under the JOBS Act until the earliest of (a) December 31, 2025, (b) the last date of PCT’s
fiscal year in which it had total annual gross revenue of at least $1.07 billion, (c) the date on which PCT is deemed to be a “large
accelerated filer” under the rules of the SEC or (d) the date on which PCT has issued more than $1.0 billion in non-convertible
debt securities during the previous three years.
ITEM
3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
The
Company is not required to provide the information required under this Item 3.
ITEM
4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation
of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Under
the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we conducted
an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act as of June 30, 2021.
Disclosure
controls and procedures are controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our
reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in
the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include controls and procedures designed to ensure that information
required to be disclosed in our company’s reports filed under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management, including
our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Based on the evaluation
of our disclosure controls and procedures, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls
and procedures were not effective as of June 30, 2021 due to the material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting
described below. In light of this fact, our management has performed additional analyses, reconciliations, and other post-closing procedures
and has concluded that, notwithstanding the material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting, the condensed consolidated
interim financial statements for the periods covered by and included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly present, in all material
respects, our financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented in conformity with GAAP.
Previously
Reported Material Weakness
As
disclosed in our prospectus filed pursuant to Rule 424(b)(3) of the Securities Act on July 1, 2021, in connection with the preparation
of PCT’s consolidated financial statements as of and for the three months ended March 31, 2021 and June 30, 2021 and the years ended
December 31, 2020 and 2019, certain material weaknesses were identified in PCT’s internal control over financial reporting. A material
weakness is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting such that there is a reasonable
possibility that a material misstatement of PCT’s interim or annual consolidated financial statements will not be prevented or detected
on a timely basis. The material weaknesses were as follows:
•PCT
did not have sufficient, qualified personnel to determine the appropriate accounting treatment for its complex agreements or transactions
that required technical accounting analysis;
•PCT’s
lack of sufficient personnel also resulted in inadequate segregation of duties in the design and operation of the internal controls over
financial reporting;
•PCT’s
lack of formal processes and controls resulted in an ineffective control environment, which led to an inadequate review of the financial
statements and financial reporting;
•PCT
did not design and maintain effective controls over certain information technology (“IT”) controls for information systems
that are relevant to the preparation of its financial statements, specifically with respect to user access, to ensure appropriate segregation
of duties that adequately restrict user access to financial applications, programs, and data to appropriate company personnel; and
•PCT
did not design and maintain effective controls surrounding the completeness and cutoff of expenses and payables, such that certain expenses
paid by a related entity on behalf of PCT were not appropriately allocated to PCT, and certain transactions were recorded in the period
when the invoice was received rather than accrued in the period when the activity took place.
These
material weaknesses could result in a misstatement of substantially all of PCT’s accounts or disclosures, which would result in
a material misstatement to the interim or annual consolidated financial statements that would not be prevented or detected. We have concluded
that these material weaknesses arose because, as a recently private company, we did not have the necessary business processes, systems,
personnel, and related internal controls necessary to satisfy the accounting and financial reporting requirements of a public company.
Remediation
Plans
We
have commenced measures to remediate the identified material weaknesses. These measures include:
•Adding
5 qualified personnel that have public accounting and/or public company experience in external reporting, technical accounting, and internal
controls.
•The
addition of these new employees, coupled with the existing personnel, have given PCT the ability to design and operate internal controls
over financial reporting with appropriate segregation of duties.
•Further,
PCT has designed and implemented formal controls for review procedures, reconciliations, disclosure and financial statement processes,
including reviews of material agreements and implementing adequate cut-off procedures for expenses and payables.
We
intend to continue to take steps to remediate the material weaknesses described above and further evolving our accounting processes, controls,
and reviews. PCT plans to continue to assess its internal controls and procedures and intends to take further action as necessary or appropriate
to address any other matters it identifies or are brought to its attention. We will not be able to fully remediate these material weaknesses
until these steps have been completed and have been operating effectively for a sufficient period of time.
We
believe we are making progress toward achieving the effectiveness of our internal controls and disclosure controls. The actions that we
are taking are subject to ongoing senior management review, as well as audit committee oversight. We will not be able to conclude whether
the steps we are taking will fully remediate the material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting until we have completed
our remediation efforts and subsequent evaluation of their effectiveness. We may also conclude that additional measures may be required
to remediate the material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting, which may necessitate further action.
Changes
in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We
are taking actions to remediate the material weaknesses relating to our internal control over financial reporting, as described above.
Except as otherwise described herein, there was no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period
covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal
control over financial reporting.
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM
1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
For
a description of the legal proceedings pending against us, see “Legal Proceedings” in Note 14 (“Contingencies”)
to the Notes to the Interim Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements appearing elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10‑Q.
In the future, PCT may
become party to additional legal matters and claims arising in the ordinary course of business. While PCT is unable to predict the outcome
of the above or future matters, it does not believe, based upon currently available facts, that the ultimate resolution of any such pending
matters will have a material adverse effect on its overall financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.
ITEM
1A. RISK FACTORS
You
should carefully consider the following risk factors, together with all of the other information included in this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q, including the unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements and notes thereto and the section entitled “Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.” The market price of the Company’s common stock
could decline due to any of these risks, in which case you could lose all or part of your investment. The Company’s business, financial
condition or results of operations could be affected materially and adversely by any of the risks discussed below. The risks and uncertainties
described below are not the only ones we face. Additional risks and uncertainties that we are unaware of, or that we currently believe
are not material, may also become important factors that materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition or results
of operations.
Risks
Related to PCT’s Status as an Early Commercial Stage Emerging Growth Company
PCT
is an early commercial stage emerging growth company with no revenue, and may never achieve or sustain profitability.
PCT
is commercializing a recycling technology that was developed by The Procter & Gamble Company (“P&G”). P&G granted
PCT a worldwide license under an Amended and Restated Patent License Agreement dated July 28, 2020, between P&G and PCT (the “License
Agreement”) for a proprietary process of restoring waste polypropylene into ultra-pure recycled polypropylene (“UPRP”)
through an extraction and filtration purification process (the “Technology”).
PCT
relies principally on the commercialization of UPRP as well as the Technology and related licenses to generate future revenue growth.
To date, such products and services have delivered no revenue. Also, UPRP product offerings and partnering revenues are in their very
early stages. PCT believes that commercialization success is dependent upon the ability to significantly increase the number of production
plants, feedstock suppliers and offtake partners as well as strategic partners that utilize UPRP and the Technology via licensing agreements.
PCT is an early commercial stage emerging growth company that evaluates various strategies to achieve its financial goals and commercialization
objectives on an ongoing basis. In this regard, PCT’s production methodology designed to achieve these objectives, including with
respect to future plant size, capacity, cost, geographic location, sequencing and timing, is subject to change as a result of modifications
to business strategy or market conditions. Furthermore, if demand for UPRP and the Technology does not increase as quickly as planned,
PCT may be unable to increase revenue levels as expected. PCT is currently not profitable. Even if PCT succeeds in increasing adoption
of UPRP products by target markets, maintaining and creating relationships with existing and new offtake partners, feedstock suppliers
and customers, and developing and commercializing additional plants, market conditions, particularly related to pricing and feedstock
costs, may result in PCT not generating sufficient revenue to achieve or sustain profitability.
PCT’s
business is not diversified.
PCT’s
initial commercial success depends on its ability to profitably operate the solid waste disposal facility and Feedstock Evaluation Unit
(the “FEU” or the “Phase I Facility”) and its ability to complete construction and profitably and successfully
operate its first commercial scale recycling facility in Ironton, Ohio (the “Phase II Facility” and, together with the Phase
I Facility, the “Project”) and the Augusta Facility. The Project is located in Lawrence County, Ohio. Other than the future
production and sale of UPRP, there are currently no other lines of business or other
sources
of revenue. Such lack of diversification may limit PCT’s ability to adapt to changing business conditions and could have an adverse
effect on PCT’s business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.
The
License Agreement sets forth certain performance and pricing targets which, if missed, could result in a termination or conversion of
the license granted under the License Agreement.
Pursuant
to the License Agreement, P&G has granted PCT a license to utilize certain P&G intellectual property. The intellectual property
is tied to the proprietary purification process by which waste polypropylene may be converted to UPRP, referred to as the Technology.
The License Agreement sets forth certain performance targets for the Phase II Facility and future facilities which, if missed, could result
in a termination of the license granted under the License Agreement (if PCT is unable to make UPRP at certain production volumes and at
certain prices within a certain time frame). The License Agreement also sets forth certain performance and pricing targets for the Phase
II Facility and future facilities which, if missed, could result in conversion of the license to a non-exclusive license (if PCT’s
UPRP is unable to meet certain purification thresholds within a certain period of time after the start of the Project or PCT is unable
or unwilling to provide P&G with UPRP at certain prices from the first plant). In the event the License Agreement is terminated or
converted to a non-exclusive license, this could have a material adverse effect on PCT’s business, financial condition, results
of operations and prospects.
PCT’s
outstanding secured and unsecured indebtedness (including at the Project level), ability to incur additional debt and the provisions in
the agreements governing PCT’s debt, and certain other agreements, could have a material adverse effect on PCT’s business,
financial condition, results of operations and prospects.
As
of June 30, 2021, after giving effect to the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement, the offering of the Revenue Bonds, and
the issuance of $60 million of the Convertible Notes, PCT had total consolidated debt of $291.3 million (representing $311.3 million in
debt, less $20.0 million of discount and issuance costs, as of June 30, 2021, including $232.0 million of indebtedness at the Project
level). PCT’s debt service obligations could have important consequences to the Company for the foreseeable future, including the
following: (i) PCT’s ability to obtain additional financing for capital expenditures, working capital or other general corporate
purposes may be impaired; (ii) a substantial portion of PCT’s cash flow from operating activities must be dedicated to the payment
of principal and interest on PCT’s debt, thereby reducing the funds available to us for PCT’s operations and other corporate
purposes; and (iii) PCT may be or become substantially more leveraged than some of its competitors, which may place PCT at a relative
competitive disadvantage and make us more vulnerable to changes in market conditions and governmental regulations.
PCT
is required to maintain compliance with certain financial and other covenants under its debt agreements. There are and will be operating
and financial restrictions and covenants in certain of PCT’s debt agreements, including the Loan Agreement and the indenture governing
PCT’s Convertible Notes, as well as certain other agreements to which PCT is or may become a party. These limit, among other things,
PCT’s ability to incur certain additional debt, create certain liens or other encumbrances, sell assets, and transfer ownership
interests and transactions with affiliates of PCT. These covenants could limit PCT’s ability to engage in activities that may be
in PCT’s best long-term interests. PCT’s failure to comply with certain covenants in these agreements could result in an Event
of Default (as defined therein) under the various debt agreements, allowing lenders to accelerate the maturity for the debt under these
agreements and to foreclose upon any collateral securing the debt. An Event of Default would also adversely affect PCT’s ability
to access its borrowing capacity and pay debt service on its outstanding debt, likely resulting in acceleration of such debt or in a default
under other agreements containing cross-default provisions. Under such circumstances, PCT might not have sufficient funds or other resources
to satisfy all of its obligations. In addition, the limitations imposed by PCT’s financing agreements on its ability to pay dividends,
incur additional debt and to take other actions might significantly impair PCT’s ability to obtain other financing, generate sufficient
cash flow from operations to enable PCT to pay its debt or to fund other liquidity needs. Such consequences would adversely affect PCT’s
business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.
PCT
faces risks and uncertainties related to litigation.
PCT may become subject
to, and may become a party to, a variety of litigation, other claims and suits. For example, on or about May 11, 2021, two putative class
action complaints were filed against PCT, certain senior members of management and others asserting violations of the federal securities
laws (the “Complaints”). The Complaints allege that PCT, certain senior members of management and others made false and/or
misleading statements in press releases and public filings regarding the Technology, PCT’s business and PCT’s prospects. The
Complaints rely on
information included in
a research report published on May 6, 2021 by Hindenburg Research LLC (the “Hindenburg Report”). PCT may incur significant
expenses as a result of legal matters relating to the Hindenburg Report. The total cost associated with these matters will depend on many
factors, including the duration of these matters and any related finding.
In addition, from time
to time, PCT may also be involved in legal proceedings and investigations arising in the ordinary course of business, including those
relating to employment matters, relationships with our feedstock suppliers and offtake partners as well as strategic partners, intellectual
property disputes, additional volatility in the market price of our securities, and other business matters. Any such claims or investigations
may be time-consuming, costly, divert management resources, or otherwise have a material adverse effect on PCT’s business, financial
condition, results of operations and prospects.
The results of litigation
and other legal proceedings are inherently uncertain and adverse judgments or settlements may result in materially adverse monetary damages
or injunctive relief against PCT. Any claims or litigation, even if fully indemnified or insured, could damage PCT’s reputation
and make it more difficult to compete effectively or obtain adequate insurance in the future. See “Legal Proceedings.”
Risks
Related to PCT’s Operations
PCT’s
business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects may be adversely affected by the impact of the global outbreak of COVID-19.
The
United States is being affected by the COVID-19 pandemic, the full effect of which on global financial markets as well as national, state
and local economies is unknown. There can be no assurances as to the materiality, severity and duration of negative economic conditions
caused by the pandemic.
In
addition to keeping PCT employees healthy and safe, the immediate impact of COVID-19 on PCT relates to the challenges that PCT’s
suppliers and contractors may be facing. PCT is a party to certain agreements, including construction contracts and certain long-term
feedstock agreements that provide for the supply to PCT of post-industrial and post-consumer resin that contains polypropylene as feedstock
with guaranteed minimum and maximum volumes at prices linked to an index for virgin polypropylene in a price schedule with collared pricing
and a minimum price floor. The feedstock agreements contain typical provisions for termination by either party due to force majeure, breach
of contract, and/or company insolvency. The impact of COVID-19 on such agreements, or the applicable agreements’ termination provisions,
is uncertain, and could result in the termination of such agreements.
If
any of PCT’s contractors or other third-parties in the global supply chain for materials, equipment or labor that are currently
being used to construct the Phase II Facility or may be used by PCT in the future to construct additional facilities, including the Augusta
Facility, are or become adversely impacted by, and/or the restrictions resulting from, the COVID-19 pandemic, PCT’s ability to timely
complete the Phase II Facility or begin and complete construction on additional facilities, including the Augusta Facility, may be disrupted.
When
PCT is producing UPRP, if the pandemic has not abated, the impact of COVID-19, while uncertain, could be manifested in the challenges
faced by PCT’s customers. For example, certain UPRP is intended for use in consumer packaging by consumer goods companies, and there
could be volatility in the packaged consumer goods market due to interruptions in consumer access to products resulting from government
actions that impact the ability of those companies to produce and ship goods. Product demand trends caused by future economic trends are
unclear. PCT has executed offtake agreements providing for a combined guaranteed minimum sale of 63 million pounds per year (“MMlb/yr.”)
of UPRP and a maximum volume of 138 MMlb/yr at PCT’s option, which reduces the ability of PCT to quickly respond to changes caused
by COVID-19, particularly as the amount of UPRP to be provided for sale under each offtake agreement is determined prior to each year
as an annual volume commitment.
There
may be additional unknown risks presented by the COVID-19 pandemic that could impact PCT’s operating results. For example, the deadly
global outbreak and continuing spread of COVID-19 could have an adverse effect on the value, operating results and financial condition
of PCT’s business; as well as the ability of PCT to maintain operations and grow revenue generated from offtake partners and customers
and could delay or prevent completion of the Phase II Facility or result in additional costs or reduced revenues. In addition, the impact
of COVID-19 is likely to cause substantial changes in consumer behavior and has caused restrictions on business and individual activities,
which are likely to lead to reduced economic activity. Extraordinary actions taken by international, federal, state, and local public
health and governmental authorities to contain and combat the outbreak and spread of
COVID-19
in regions throughout the world, including travel bans, quarantines, “stay-at-home” orders, and similar mandates for many
individuals and businesses to substantially restrict daily activities could have an adverse effect on PCT’s business, financial
condition, results of operations and prospects.
Construction
of the Phase II Facility may not be completed in the expected timeframe or in a cost-effective manner. Any delays in the construction
of the Phase II Facility could severely impact PCT’s business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.
The
Project will constitute the first of its kind. Construction on the Project commenced in 2018 with the construction of the Phase I Facility
comprised of the FEU, operating within an 11,000 square foot building located on the Project site. The FEU was brought online on July
1, 2019. Construction of the Phase II Facility has commenced, will include modifications to 150,000 square feet of existing buildings,
utilities and the Project storage area. Production is expected to commence in late 2022 and the plant is expected to be fully operational
in 2023. The Company might not be able to achieve completion of the Phase II Facility in the expected timeframe, in a cost-effective manner
or at all due to a variety of factors, including, but not limited to, a stoppage of work as a result of the COVID-19 outbreak, unexpected
construction problems or severe weather. Significant unexpected delays in construction could result in additional costs or reduced revenues,
and it could limit the amount of UPRP PCT can produce, which could severely impact PCT’s business, financial condition, results
of operations and prospects.
The
construction and commissioning of any new project, such as the Augusta Facility, is dependent on a number of contingencies some of which
are beyond PCT’s control. There is a risk that significant unanticipated costs or delays could arise due to, among other things,
errors or omissions, unanticipated or concealed Project site conditions, including subsurface conditions, unforeseen technical issues
or increases in plant and equipment costs, insufficiency of water supply and other utility infrastructure, or inadequate contractual arrangements.
Should significant unanticipated costs arise, this could have a material adverse impact on PCT’s business, financial performance
and operations. No assurance can be given that construction will be completed, will be completed on time or will be completed at all,
or as to whether PCT, which has provided a Guaranty of Completion of the Project, will have sufficient funds available to complete construction.
If the Project is not completed, funds are not likely to be available to pay debt service on PCT’s outstanding debt.
Initially,
PCT will rely on a single facility for all of its operations.
Initially,
PCT will rely solely on the operations at the Project. Adverse changes or developments affecting the Project could impair PCT’s
ability to produce UPRP and its business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations. Any shutdown or period of reduced
production at the Project, which may be caused by regulatory noncompliance or other issues, as well as other factors beyond its control,
such as severe weather conditions, natural disaster, fire, power interruption, work stoppage, disease outbreaks or pandemics (such as
COVID-19), equipment failure or delay in supply delivery, would significantly disrupt PCT’s ability to grow and produce UPRP in
a timely manner, meet its contractual obligations and operate its business. PCT’s equipment is costly to replace or repair, and
PCT’s equipment supply chains may be disrupted in connection with pandemics, such as COVID-19, trade wars or other factors. If any
material amount of PCT’s machinery were damaged, it would be unable to predict when, if at all, it could replace or repair such
machinery or find co-manufacturers with suitable alternative machinery, which could adversely affect PCT’s business, financial condition,
results of operations and prospects. Performance guarantees may not be sufficient to cover damages or losses, or the guarantors under
such guarantees may not have the ability to pay. Any insurance coverage PCT has may not be sufficient to cover all of its potential losses
and may not continue to be available to PCT on acceptable terms, or at all.
Cyber
risk and the failure to maintain the integrity of PCT’s operational or security systems or infrastructure, or those of third parties
with which PCT does business, could have a material adverse effect on PCT’s business, financial condition, results of operations
and prospects.
PCT
is subject to an increasing number of information technology vulnerabilities, threats and targeted computer crimes which pose a risk to
the security of its systems and networks and the confidentiality, availability and integrity of data. Disruptions or failures in the physical
infrastructure or operating systems that support PCT’s businesses, offtake partners, feedstock suppliers and customers, or cyber
attacks or security breaches of PCT’s networks or systems, could result in the loss of customers and business opportunities, legal
liability, regulatory fines, penalties or intervention, reputational damage, reimbursement or other compensatory costs, and additional
compliance costs, any of which could materially adversely affect PCT’s business, financial condition, results of operations and
prospects.
While PCT attempts to mitigate these risks, PCT’s systems, networks, products, solutions and services remain potentially vulnerable
to advanced and persistent threats.
PCT
also maintains and has access to sensitive, confidential or personal data or information in its business that is subject to privacy and
security laws, regulations and customer controls. Despite PCT’s efforts to protect such sensitive, confidential or personal data
or information, PCT’s facilities and systems and those of its customers, offtake partners, feedstock suppliers and third-party service
providers may be vulnerable to security breaches, theft, misplaced or lost data, programming and/or human errors that could lead to the
compromise of sensitive, confidential or personal data or information or improper use of PCT’s systems and software.
PCT
may be unable to sufficiently protect its proprietary rights and may encounter disputes from time to time relating to its use of the intellectual
property of third parties.
PCT
relies on its proprietary intellectual property, including numerous patents and registered trademarks, as well as its licensed intellectual
property under the License Agreement and others to market, promote and sell UPRP products. PCT monitors and protects against activities
that might infringe, dilute, or otherwise harm its patents, trademarks and other intellectual property and relies on the patent, trademark
and other laws of the U.S. and other countries. However, PCT may be unable to prevent third parties from using its intellectual property
without authorization. In addition, the laws of some non-U.S. jurisdictions, particularly those of certain emerging markets, provide less
protection for PCT’s proprietary rights than the laws of the U.S. and present greater risks of counterfeiting and other infringement.
To the extent PCT cannot protect its intellectual property, unauthorized use and misuse of PCT’s intellectual property could harm
its competitive position and have a material adverse effect on PCT’s business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.
Despite
PCT’s efforts to protect these rights, unauthorized third parties may attempt to duplicate or copy the proprietary aspects of its
technology and processes. PCT’s competitors and other third parties independently may design around or develop similar technology
or otherwise duplicate PCT’s services or products such that PCT could not assert its intellectual property rights against them.
In addition, PCT’s contractual arrangements may not effectively prevent disclosure of its intellectual property and confidential
and proprietary information or provide an adequate remedy in the event of an unauthorized disclosure. Measures in place may not prevent
misappropriation or infringement of PCT’s intellectual property or proprietary information and the resulting loss of competitive
advantage, and PCT may be required to litigate to protect its intellectual property and proprietary information from misappropriation
or infringement by others, which is expensive, could cause a diversion of resources and may not be successful.
PCT
also may encounter disputes from time to time concerning intellectual property rights of others, and it may not prevail in these disputes.
Third parties may raise claims against PCT alleging that PCT, or consultants or other third parties retained or indemnified by PCT, infringe
on their intellectual property rights. Some third-party intellectual property rights may be extremely broad, and it may not be possible
for PCT to conduct its operations in such a way as to avoid all alleged violations of such intellectual property rights. Given the complex,
rapidly changing and competitive technological and business environment in which PCT operates, and the potential risks and uncertainties
of intellectual property-related litigation, an assertion of an infringement claim against PCT may cause PCT to spend significant amounts
to defend the claim, even if PCT ultimately prevails, pay significant money damages, lose significant revenues, be prohibited from using
the relevant systems, processes, technologies or other intellectual property (temporarily or permanently), cease offering certain products
or services, or incur significant license, royalty or technology development expenses.
Moreover,
it has become common in recent years for individuals and groups to purchase intellectual property assets for the sole purpose of making
claims of infringement and attempting to extract settlements from companies such as PCT. Even in instances where PCT believes that claims
and allegations of intellectual property infringement against it are without merit, defending against such claims is time consuming and
expensive and could result in the diversion of time and attention of PCT’s management and employees. In addition, although in some
cases a third party may have agreed to indemnify PCT for such costs, such indemnifying party may refuse or be unable to uphold its contractual
obligations. In other cases, insurance may not cover potential claims of this type adequately or at all, and PCT may be required to pay
monetary damages, which may be significant.
Risks
Related to PCT’s Production of UPRP
There
is no guarantee the Technology is scalable to commercial-scale operation.
The
Technology is based upon generally available commercial equipment to process contaminated polypropylene into clean recycled polypropylene
product. Certain of the equipment to be utilized in the Phase II Facility has not operated with the same feedstock in a commercial mode.
While PCT has constructed the FEU to demonstrate the process using the same or similar equipment (except at a smaller scale) as the commercial-scale
Phase II Facility, the FEU does not operate at a commercial-scale. The collective test data was used to design the Phase II Facility equipment
for commercial scale and testing under the intended operating conditions and configuration for the commercial-scale operation to verify
reproducibility of results including color, melt flow index, moldability (tensile modulus and other measures) and the odor of the final
PCT-produced polypropylene product. While that testing indicated that the FEU can generate recycled polypropylene product that on average
meets all of its key parameter targets, PCT cannot guarantee these results will be achieved in commercial-scale operation. Further, of
the four quality parameters for UPRP, odor is the most difficult to characterize and measure. PCT’s goal is to generate product
that will significantly reduce the odor of the offtake and be comparable or nearly comparable to virgin polypropylene with respect to
level of odor, but PCT cannot guarantee that the Project will be capable of achieving the quality parameters of UPRP, performance guarantees
or meeting the requirements of the currently applicable environmental permits. The Project’s failure to achieve the quality parameters
for UPRP, performance guarantees or meet the requirements of the currently applicable environmental permits could impact PCT’s business,
financial condition, results of operations and prospects if the possible shortfalls versus specification are not effectively remedied
per contract.
Furthermore,
PCT’s first cluster facility, which will be located in Augusta, Georgia, will be PCT’s first scaled up “cluster”
model. PCT is currently working on pre-engineering for the design and installation of multiple commercial lines at the Augusta Facility
and there is no guaranty that these efforts will be successful. If the Augusta Facility fails to achieve the expected efficiencies, including
across the construction and permitting processes, as well as fails to reduce average capital expenditures per plant and reduce overall
operating costs, PCT’s business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects could be materially adversely impacted.
PCT
may not be successful in finding future strategic partners for continuing development of additional offtake and feedstock opportunities.
PCT
may seek to develop additional strategic partnerships to increase feedstock supply and offtake amount due to capital costs required to
develop the UPRP product or manufacturing constraints. PCT may not be successful in efforts to establish such strategic partnerships or
other alternative arrangements for the UPRP product or Technology because PCT’s research and development pipeline may be insufficient,
PCT’s product may be deemed to be at too early of a stage of development for collaborative effort or third parties may not view
PCT’s product as having the requisite potential to demonstrate commercial success.
If
PCT is unable to reach agreements with suitable collaborators on a timely basis, on acceptable terms or at all, PCT may have to curtail
the development of UPRP product, reduce or delay the development program, delay potential commercialization, reduce the scope of any sales
or marketing activities or increase expenditures and undertake development or commercialization activities at PCT’s own expense.
If PCT elects to fund development or commercialization activities on its own, PCT may need to obtain additional expertise and additional
capital, which may not be available on acceptable terms or at all. If PCT fails to enter into collaborations and does not have sufficient
funds or expertise to undertake the necessary development and commercialization activities, PCT may not be able to further develop product
candidates and PCT’s business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects may be materially and adversely affected.
PCT’s
failure to secure waste polypropylene could have a negative impact on PCT’s business, financial condition, results of operations
and prospects.
PCT’s
ability to procure a sufficient quantity and quality of post-industrial and post-consumer waste that contains polypropylene as feedstock
is dependent upon certain factors outside of PCT’s control including, but not limited to, changes to pricing levels for waste polypropylene,
recycled polypropylene and non-recycled polypropylene, shortages in supply, interruptions affecting suppliers (including those due to
operational restraints, industrial relations, transportation difficulties, accidents or natural disasters), or the introduction of new
laws or regulations that make access to waste polypropylene more difficult or expensive. PCT has entered into four feedstock supply agreements
each for a term of three years with automatic one-year renewals for 17 years, and one feedstock supply
agreement
for a term ending October 31, 2023 (collectively, the “Feedstock Supply Agreements”). The Feedstock Supply Agreements are
subject to prior termination by either party upon ninety days’ notice prior to expiration of the current term. The Feedstock Supply
Agreements provide for a combined guaranteed minimum of 60 MMlb/yr. of feedstock and at PCT’s option for a combined maximum of 195
MMlb/yr., and up to a combined 210 MMlb/yr. as an option to be mutually agreed to. The amount of feedstock to be supplied each year by
each supplier is determined prior to each year in an Annual Volume Commitment (as defined therein). The feedstock suppliers guarantee
that they will not sell to other parties or otherwise dispose of any portion of feedstock up to the Annual Volume Commitment. While there
are no penalties stated in the Feedstock Supply Agreements for failure of either party to deliver and/or accept the committed quantity
of feedstock, PCT may terminate an agreement by giving notice of nonrenewal as indicated above. While PCT believes it has sourced sufficient
feedstock of desirable quality, it cannot guarantee that feedstock suppliers will have sufficient quantities available and at the appropriate
specifications in accordance with their respective agreements with PCT. If feedstock is not available to PCT in sufficient quantity and
of requisite quality, PCT’s business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects could be materially adversely impacted.
Because
PCT’s global expansion requires sourcing feedstock and supplies from around the world, including Europe, changes to international
trade agreements, tariffs, import and excise duties, taxes or other governmental rules and regulations could adversely affect PCT’s
business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.
PCT’s
global expansion model will require sourcing feedstock from suppliers around the world. The U.S. federal government or other governmental
bodies may propose changes to international trade agreements, tariffs, taxes and other government rules and regulations. If any restrictions
or significant increases in costs or tariffs are imposed related to feedstock sourced from Europe, or elsewhere, as a result of amendments
to existing trade agreements, and PCT’s supply costs consequently increase, PCT may be required to raise UPRP prices, which may
result in decreased margins, the loss of customers, and a material adverse effect on PCT’s financial results. The extent to which
PCT’s margins could decrease in response to any future tariffs is uncertain. PCT continues to evaluate the impact of effective trade
agreements, as well as other recent changes in foreign trade policy on its supply chain, costs, sales and profitability. PCT is actively
working through strategies to mitigate such impact, including reviewing feedstock sourcing options and working with feedstock suppliers.
In addition, COVID-19 has resulted in increased travel restrictions and the extended shutdown of certain businesses throughout the world.
The impact of COVID-19 on PCT’s business is uncertain at this time and will depend on future developments; however, prolonged closures
in Europe, and elsewhere, may disrupt the operations of certain feedstock suppliers, which could, in turn, negatively impact PCT’s
business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects. Any such impact could be material.
Risks
Related to the Market for UPRP
The
market for UPRP is still in the development phase and the acceptance of UPRP by manufacturers and potential customers is not guaranteed.
The
customer approval process for the UPRP product may take longer than expected and certain potential customers may be slow to accept the
product produced by PCT or may not accept it at all. PCT has agreed to a strategic partnership term sheet to enter into an offtake agreement
with a term of 20 years, whereby PCT guarantees the UPRP product to meet specific criteria for color and opacity. There is no odor specification
in the offtake agreements. Any such changes may require modifications to its executed offtake agreements, which provide for a combined
guaranteed minimum sale of 63 MMlb/yr of UPRP at PCT’s option, and a combined maximum of 138 MMlb/yr. The amount of UPRP to be provided
for sale under each agreement is determined prior to each year as an Annual Volume Commitment. PCT must provide samples of the product
to each customer so that the customer may determine if the product meets specifications, regulatory and legal requirements, customer’s
internal policies, and technical, safety, and other qualifications for UPRP use in the customer’s products. Upon delivery, the customer
will have 30 days to inspect the UPRP and either accept or reject the material. Provided PCT has sufficient feedstock and that the UPRP
meets the product specifications and conditions as determined in each offtake agreement, PCT should have sufficient product offtake capacity
to accommodate a production rate of 107 MMlb/yr. The inability of PCT to provide product of sufficient quantity and quality for sale pursuant
to the offtake agreements is likely to materially adversely affect PCT’s business, financial condition, results of operations and
prospects.
Certain
of PCT’s offtake agreements are subject to index pricing, and fluctuation in index prices may adversely impact PCT’s financial
results.
While
PCT expects the price of its UPRP to continue to command a premium over the price of virgin resin and generally not be subject to fluctuations
in the price of virgin PP, there is no guarantee of this result. Offtake agreements contain pricing for PCT’s products at both fixed
prices and Index prices. PCT is using Information Handling Services provided by IHS Market Ltd (“IHS”) as it relates to the
monthly market movement price mechanism index known as “Global Plastics & Polymers Report, Month-End: Polypropylene (PP)”
and “Homopolymer (GP Inj. Mldg.),” with the price description terms of “Contract-market; HC Bulk, Delivered; Ex-Discounts,
rebates” (delivered via railcar), based on the lower value listed in “Cts/Lb.” Over the last year the index has been
as high as $1.32 in February 2021 and as low as $0.54 in April 2020. Should the modeled index price forecasted by IHS be materially lower
than the IHS estimate, PCT’s business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects may be materially adversely impacted.
Competition
could reduce demand for PCT’s products or negatively affect PCT’s sales mix or price realization. Failure to compete effectively
by meeting consumer preferences, developing and marketing innovative solutions, maintaining strong customer service and distribution relationships,
and expanding solutions capabilities and reach could adversely affect PCT’s business, financial condition, results of operations
and prospects.
While
PCT expects to produce a unique product in its UPRP, PCT operates in a competitive global market for polypropylene sources — virgin
and recycled polypropylene. Competitors or new entrants might develop new products or technologies which compete with PCT and its proprietary
Technology. PCT cannot predict changes that might affect its competitiveness or whether existing competitors or new entrants might develop
products that reduce demand for PCT’s UPRP. The development of new products or technologies which compete with PCT’s UPRP
may have a material adverse effect on PCT’s business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.
In
addition, PCT has granted a sublicense of P&G intellectual property back to P&G under the terms of the License Agreement, with
a limited right to sublicense by P&G (the “Grant Back”). Under the Grant Back, for five years after the effective date
of the License Agreement, the aggregate tonnage that may be produced under the Grant Back will be capped at a certain level per year worldwide.
Beyond year 5, that aggregate annual tonnage will be expanded for each of the six regions worldwide. P&G has agreed that territory
under the Grant Back will exclude the start of construction of a plant within a certain radius of the Project for five years from the
effective date of the License Agreement. If P&G is able to establish production, either on its own or through a sublicense agreement
with another partner, in any territory, P&G production will remain capped within that territory beyond the 5 years. If P&G sublicenses
the P&G intellectual property under the Grant Back to other manufacturers, UPRP production and supply could increase, adversely impacting
PCT’s business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.
Risks
Related to Regulatory Developments
PCT
may not be able to meet applicable regulatory requirements for the use of PCT’s UPRP in food grade applications, and, even if the
requirements are met, complying on an ongoing basis with the numerous regulatory requirements applicable to the UPRP and PCT’s facilities
will be time-consuming and costly.
The
use of UPRP in food grade applications is subject to regulation by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”). The FDA
has established certain guidelines for the use of recycled plastics in food packaging, as set forth in the “Guidance for Industry
- Use of Recycled Plastics in Food Packaging: Chemistry Considerations (August 2006).” In order for the UPRP to be used in food
grade applications, PCT will request one or more Letters of No Objection (“LNO”) from the FDA. The process for obtaining an
LNO will include FDA evaluation of both the PCT purification process, the Technology, as well as the recycled feedstock resin. As such,
PCT may seek multiple LNOs for type of use and for different sources of feedstock. In addition, as needed, individual surrogate challenge
testing and migration studies will be conducted to simulate articles in contact with food. Surrogate challenge testing can be used in
lieu of, or in conjunction with, migration testing for the FDA’s evaluation of PCT’s Technology. The need for migration testing
is informed by the results from the surrogate challenge testing.
PCT
cannot guarantee the receipt of the LNOs and a failure to receive the requested LNOs will have an adverse effect on PCT’s business,
financial condition, results of operations and prospects.
Furthermore,
changes in regulatory requirements, laws and policies, or evolving interpretations of existing regulatory requirements, laws and policies,
may result in increased compliance costs, delays, capital expenditures
and
other financial obligations that could adversely affect PCT’s business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.
PCT
expects to encounter regulations in most if not all of the countries in which PCT may seek to expand, and PCT cannot be sure that it will
be able to obtain necessary approvals in a timely manner or at all. If PCT’s UPRP does not meet applicable regulatory requirements
in a particular country or at all, then PCT may face reduced market demand in those countries and PCT’s business, financial condition,
results of operations and prospects will be adversely affected.
The
various regulatory schemes applicable to PCT’s UPRP will continue to apply following initial approval. Monitoring regulatory changes
and ensuring our ongoing compliance with applicable requirements is time-consuming and may affect our business, financial condition, results
of operation and prospects. If PCT fails to comply with such requirements on an ongoing basis, PCT may be subject to fines or other penalties,
or may be prevented from selling UPRP, and PCT’s business, financial condition, results of operation and prospects may be harmed.
The
operation of and construction of the Project is subject to governmental regulation.
Under
the loan agreement entered into in connection with PCT’s outstanding Revenue Bonds (the “Loan Agreement”), PCT must:
(i) not commence construction or operation of the Project prior to receipt of all applicable permits and easements required for the particular
phase of construction or operation; (ii) abide by the terms and conditions of all such permits and easements; and (iii) operate the Project
at all times in the manner required or permitted by such permits and easements.
PCT
has not identified any technical or engineering circumstances that it believes would prevent the issuance of the key permits and approvals
required for construction and operation of the Project in the ordinary course consistent with the planned construction of the Project.
Delays in or failure to obtain and maintain any required permit or approval, or delay in satisfying or failure to satisfy any condition
or requirement or any approval or permit could delay or prevent completion of the Project or result in additional costs or reduced revenues.
Federal, state and local statutory and regulatory requirements applicable to construction and operation of the Project are subject to
change. No assurance can be given that PCT or any other affected party will be able to comply with such changes. Additional statutory
or regulatory requirements may be imposed upon both the Project and the additional plant to be located in Augusta, Georgia in the future,
which might materially increase costs of operation or maintenance.
Legislative,
regulatory or judicial developments could affect PCT’s business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.
PCT
is subject to extensive air, water and other environmental and workplace safety laws and regulations at the federal and state level. In
addition, PCT will be subject to additional regulatory regimes upon expanding to new regions, including foreign regulatory authorities
in the European Union (“EU”) such as the European Commission, the European Food Safety Authority (“EFSA”), and
similar regulatory authorities elsewhere, such as in Asia. Some of these laws require or may require PCT to operate under a number of
environmental permits. These laws, regulations and permits can often require pollution control equipment or operational changes to limit
actual or potential impacts to the environment. These laws, regulations and permit conditions may change and become more difficult to
comply with. A violation of these laws, regulations or permit conditions could result in substantial fines, damages, criminal sanctions,
permit revocations and/or a plant shutdown. Any such action may have a material adverse effect on PCT’s business, financial condition,
results of operations and prospects.
Risks
Related to Human Capital Management
PCT
is dependent on management and key personnel, and PCT’s business would suffer if it fails to retain its key personnel and attract
additional highly skilled employees.
PCT’s
success is dependent on the specialized skills of its management team and key operating personnel. This may present particular challenges
as PCT operates in a highly specialized industry sector, which may make replacement of its management team and key operating personnel
difficult. A loss of the managers or key employees, or their failure to satisfactorily perform their responsibilities, could have an adverse
effect on PCT’s business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.
PCT’s
future success will depend on its ability to identify, hire, develop, motivate and retain highly qualified personnel for all areas of
its organization, particularly research and development, recycling technology, operations and sales. Trained and experienced personnel
are in high demand and may be in short supply. Many of the companies with which PCT competes for experienced employees have greater resources
than PCT does and may be able to offer more attractive terms of employment. In addition, PCT invests significant time and expense in training
employees, which increases their value to competitors that may seek to recruit them. PCT may not be able to attract, develop and maintain
the skilled workforce necessary to operate its business, and labor expenses may increase as a result of a shortage in the supply of qualified
personnel, which will negatively impact PCT’s business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.
PCT’s
management has limited experience in operating a public company.
PCT’s
executive officers and directors have limited experience in the management of a publicly traded company subject to significant regulatory
oversight and the reporting obligations under federal securities laws. PCT’s management team may not successfully or effectively
manage its transition to a public company following the Merger. Their limited experience in dealing with the increasingly complex laws
pertaining to public companies could be a significant disadvantage in that it is likely that an increasing amount of their time may be
devoted to these activities which will result in less time being devoted to the management and growth of PCT. It is possible that PCT
will be required to expand its employee base and hire additional employees to support its operations as a public company, which will increase
its operating costs in future periods.
Risks
Related to PCT’s common stock
An
active trading market for PCT’s common stock may never develop or be sustained, which may make it difficult to sell the shares of
PCT’s common stock you purchase.
An
active trading market for PCT’s common stock may not develop or continue or, if developed, may not be sustained, which would make
it difficult for you to sell your shares of the Company’s common stock at an attractive price (or at all). The market price of PCT’s
common stock may decline below your purchase price, and you may not be able to sell your shares of the Company’s common stock at
or above the price you paid for such shares (or at all).
There
can be no assurance that PCT will be able to comply with the continued listing standards of NASDAQ.
The
Company’s common stock, warrants and units are currently listed on NASDAQ under the symbols “PCT,” “PCTTW”
and “PCTTU,” respectively. NASDAQ requires listed companies to comply with NASDAQ’s continued listing standards. If
PCT is unable to comply with NASDAQ’S continued listing standards, NASDAQ could delist PCT’s securities from trading on NASDAQ
and, in such a case, PCT and its stockholders could face significant material adverse consequences including:
•a
limited availability of market quotations for PCT’s securities;
•reduced
liquidity for PCT’s securities;
•a
determination that the Company’s common stock is a “penny stock” which will require brokers trading in the Company’s
common stock to adhere to more stringent rules and possibly result in a reduced level of trading activity in the secondary trading market
for PCT’s securities;
•a
limited amount of news and analyst coverage; and
•a
decreased ability to issue additional securities or obtain additional financing in the future.
The
market price of the Company’s common stock is likely to be highly volatile, and you may lose some or all of your investment.
The
market price of PCT’s common stock is likely to be highly volatile and may be subject to wide fluctuations in response to a variety
of factors, including the following:
•the
impact of COVID-19 pandemic on PCT’s business;
•the
inability to maintain the listing of PCT’s shares of common stock on NASDAQ;
•the
inability to recognize the anticipated benefits of the Business Combination, which may be affected by, among other things, competition,
PCT’s inability to grow and manage growth profitably, and retain its key employees;
•changes
in applicable laws or regulations;
•risks
relating to the uncertainty of PCT’s projected financial information; and
•risks
related to the organic and inorganic growth of PCT’s business and the timing of expected business milestones.
In
addition, the stock markets have experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that have affected and continue to affect the market
prices of equity securities of many companies. These fluctuations have often been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance
of those companies. Broad market and industry factors, as well as general economic, political, regulatory and market conditions, may negatively
affect the market price of PCT’s common stock, regardless of PCT’s actual operating performance.
The
former stockholders of ROCH have the right to elect a certain number of directors to our board of directors.
The
terms of the Investor Rights Agreement provide a majority of those stockholders of ROCH party to such agreement (which does not include
public stockholders of ROCH) the right to elect two directors to the board of directors of PCT for a period of two years following the
Closing Date, provided that in the event a majority of the holders of the Pre-PIPE shares choose to select one of such designees, they
are entitled to so choose one until the Pre-PIPE Investors no longer hold 10% or more of PCT’s outstanding common stock and such
stockholders of ROCH are entitled to choose the other. Pursuant to these provisions and effective upon the consummation of the Business
Combination, ROCH designated Mr. Fernando Musa to assume a seat on PCT’s board of directors and the holders of the Pre-PIPE Shares
designated Mr. Jeffrey Fieler to assume the other seat as an IRA Designee. As a result of the percentage of PCT common stock represented
by parties to the Investor Rights Agreement following the Closing Date, it is unlikely that public stockholders of PCT will have the ability
to effectively influence the election of directors during the period these provisions of the Investor Rights Agreement are applicable.
While the directors designated pursuant to the Investor Rights Agreement are obligated to act in accordance with their applicable fiduciary
duties, their interests may be aligned with the interests of the investors they represent, which may not always coincide with our corporate
interests or the interests of our other stockholders.
If
securities or industry analysts do not publish research or reports about PCT, or publish negative reports, PCT’s stock price and
trading volume could decline.
The
trading market for PCT’s common stock depends, in part, on the research and reports that securities or industry analysts publish
about PCT. PCT does not have any control over these analysts. If PCT’s financial performance fails to meet analyst estimates or
one or more of the analysts who cover PCT downgrade its common stock or change their opinion, PCT’s stock price would likely decline.
If one or more of these analysts cease coverage of PCT or fail to regularly publish reports on PCT, it could lose visibility in the financial
markets, which could cause PCT’s stock price or trading volume to decline.
Because
PCT does not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future, capital appreciation, if any, would be your sole source of
gain.
PCT
currently anticipates that it will retain future earnings for the development, operation and expansion of its business and does not anticipate
declaring or paying any cash dividends for the foreseeable future. As a result, capital appreciation, if any, of PCT’s shares of
common stock would be your sole source of gain on an investment in such shares for the foreseeable future.
The
exercise of registration rights or sales of a substantial amount of PCT’s common stock may adversely affect the market price of
PCT’s common stock.
In
connection with the consummation of the Business Combination, Roth Capital Partners, LLC (“Roth”), Craig-Hallum Capital Group,
LLC (“C-H”), PCT and certain Initial Stockholders and PCT Unitholders (collectively, the “IRA
Holders”)
entered into an Investor Rights Agreement pursuant to which PCT will be obligated to file a registration statement to register the resale
of certain securities of PCT held by the IRA Holders. IRA Holders have certain demand rights and “piggy-back” registration
rights, subject to certain requirements and customary conditions. PCT also agreed to register the shares of the Company’s common
stock issued in connection with the PIPE prior to the consummation of the Business Combination pursuant to the PIPE Registration Rights
Agreement.
In
connection with its issuance of Convertible Notes, PCT entered into a registration rights agreement (the “Magnetar Registration
Rights Agreement”) with a series of funds affiliated with Magnetar Capital LLC (the “Magnetar Investors”). Pursuant
to the Magnetar Registration Rights Agreement, PCT, ROCH, or an affiliate thereof was required to file a registration statement to register
the resale of the Common Stock (as defined therein) held by the Magnetar Investors upon conversion of the Convertible Notes no later than
60 days following the consummation of the Business Combination (as extended through June 26th as a result of certain waivers granted by
Magnetar), and was required to have such registration statement declared effective by a certain period of time or pay liquidated damages.
The Magnetar Investors also have certain demand rights, subject to certain requirements and customary conditions.
The aggregate number of
shares of PCT’s Common Stock that will be entitled to registration under the Investor Rights Agreement (based on the minimum number
of PCT Unitholders required to enter into the Investor Rights Agreement to satisfy a closing condition from the Merger Agreement to the
Business Combination), the PIPE Registration Rights Agreement and the Magnetar Registration Rights Agreement is approximately 94.3 million.
A registration statement for 25.0 million shares of Common Stock was declared effective on March 19, 2021 in connection with the PIPE
Registration Rights Agreement. A registration statement for approximately 8.9 million shares of Common Stock underlying the Convertible
Notes held by Magnetar (plus an additional approximately 1.0 million shares of Common Stock if future interest payments are made entirely
in kind and the maturity date of the Convertible Notes is extended) and approximately 2.4 million shares of Common Stock held by certain
Initial Stockholders (as defined therein) was declared effective on July 1, 2021 in connection with the Magnetar Registration Rights Agreement
and the Investor Rights Agreement. The registration and availability of such a significant number of securities for trading in the public
market may have an adverse effect on the market price of the Company’s common stock.
Future
offerings of debt or offerings or issuances of equity securities by PCT may adversely affect the market price of PCT’s common stock
or otherwise dilute all other stockholders.
In
the future, PCT may attempt to obtain financing or to further increase PCT’s capital resources by issuing additional shares of PCT’s
common stock or offering debt or other equity securities, including commercial paper, medium-term notes, senior or subordinated notes,
debt securities convertible into equity or shares of preferred stock. PCT also expects to grant equity awards to employees, directors,
and consultants under PCT’s stock incentive plans. Future acquisitions could require substantial additional capital in excess of
cash from operations. PCT would expect to obtain the capital required for acquisitions through a combination of additional issuances of
equity, corporate indebtedness and/or cash from operations.
Issuing
additional shares of PCT’s common stock or other equity securities or securities convertible into equity may dilute the economic
and voting rights of PCT’s existing stockholders or reduce the market price of PCT’s common stock or both. Upon liquidation,
holders of such debt securities and preferred shares, if issued, and lenders with respect to other borrowings would receive a distribution
of PCT’s available assets prior to the holders of PCT’s common stock. Debt securities convertible into equity could be subject
to adjustments in the conversion ratio pursuant to which certain events may increase the number of equity securities issuable upon conversion.
Preferred shares, if issued, could have a preference with respect to liquidating distributions or a preference with respect to dividend
payments that could limit PCT’s ability to pay dividends to the holders of PCT’s common stock. PCT’s decision to issue
securities in any future offering will depend on market conditions and other factors beyond PCT’s control, which may adversely affect
the amount, timing and nature of PCT’s future offerings.
Certain
provisions of the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation and the Amended and Restated Bylaws could hinder, delay or prevent
a change in control of PCT, which could adversely affect the price of PCT’s common stock.
Certain
provisions of the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation and the Amended and Restated Bylaws could make it more difficult for
a third party to acquire PCT without the consent of PCT’s board of directors. These provisions include:
•authorizing
the issuance of undesignated preferred stock, the terms of which may be established and the shares of which may be issued without stockholder
approval, and which may include super voting, special approval, dividend, or other rights or preferences superior to the rights of the
holders of PCT’s common stock;
•prohibiting
stockholder action by written consent, requiring all stockholder actions be taken at a meeting of our stockholders;
•providing
that the board of directors is expressly authorized to make, alter or repeal the Amended and Restated Bylaws;
•until
the fifth anniversary of the effectiveness of the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, providing that directors may be removed
only for cause and then only by the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the voting power of the outstanding shares then entitled
to vote in an election of directors, voting together as a single class;
•providing
that vacancies on PCT’s board of directors, including newly-created directorships, may be filled only by a majority vote of directors
then in office;
•prohibiting
stockholders from calling special meetings of stockholders;
•until
the fifth anniversary of the effectiveness of the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, requiring the affirmative vote of
the holders of at least 66 2∕3% in voting power of the outstanding shares then entitled to vote in an election of directors, voting
together as a single class, to amend certain provisions of the Amended and Restated Bylaws and certain provisions of the Amended and Restated
Certificate of Incorporation;
•establishing
advance notice requirements for nominations for elections to the board of directors or for proposing matters that can be acted upon by
stockholders at stockholder meetings; and
•establishing
a classified board of directors until the fifth anniversary of the effectiveness of the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation,
as a result of which PCT’s board of directors will be divided into three classes, with each class serving for staggered three-year
terms, which prevents stockholders from electing an entirely new board of directors at an annual meeting.
In
addition, these provisions may make it difficult and expensive for a third party to pursue a tender offer, change in control or takeover
attempt that is opposed by PCT’s management or our board of directors. Stockholders who might desire to participate in these types
of transactions may not have an opportunity to do so, even if the transaction is favorable to them. These anti-takeover provisions could
substantially impede your ability to benefit from a change in control or change PCT’s management and board of directors and, as
a result, may adversely affect the market price of PCT’s common stock and your ability to realize any potential change of control
premium.”
General
Risk Factors
PCT
may be unable to obtain additional financing to fund the operations and growth of the business following the consummation of the Business
Combination.
PCT
may require additional financing to fund its operations or growth following the consummation of the Business Combination. The failure
to secure additional financing could have a material adverse effect on the continued development or growth of PCT. Such financings may
result in dilution to stockholders, issuance of securities with priority as to liquidation and dividend and other rights more favorable
than common stock, imposition of debt covenants and repayment obligations, or other restrictions that may adversely affect its business.
In addition, PCT may seek additional capital due to favorable market conditions or strategic considerations even if it believes that it
has sufficient funds for current or future operating plans. There can be no assurance that financing will be available to PCT on favorable
terms, or at all. The inability to obtain financing when needed may make it more difficult for PCT to operate its business or implement
its growth plans.
PCT
is an emerging growth company, and PCT cannot be certain if the reduced reporting requirements applicable to emerging growth companies
will make its shares less attractive to investors.
PCT
is an emerging growth company, as defined in the JOBS Act. For as long as PCT continues to be an emerging growth company, it may take
advantage of exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not “emerging
growth companies,” including exemption from compliance with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404, reduced disclosure
obligations regarding executive compensation and exemptions from the requirements of holding a nonbinding advisory vote on executive compensation
and stockholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved. PCT will remain an emerging growth company until the
earlier of (1) the date (a) December 31, 2025, (b) in which PCT has total annual gross revenue of at least $1.07 billion or (c) in which
PCT is deemed to be a large accelerated filer, and (2) the date on which PCT has issued more than $1.0 billion in non-convertible debt
during the prior three-year period.
In
addition, under the JOBS Act, emerging growth companies can delay adopting new or revised accounting standards until such time as those
standards apply to private companies. PCT has irrevocably elected not to avail itself of this exemption from new or revised accounting
standards and, therefore, PCT will be subject to the same new or revised accounting standards as other public companies that are not emerging
growth companies.
PCT
cannot predict if investors will find its common stock less attractive because PCT may rely on these exemptions. If some investors find
PCT’s common stock less attractive as a result, there may be a less active trading market for the common stock and its market price
may be more volatile.
PCT
identified certain material weaknesses in its internal control over financial reporting. If PCT is unable to remediate these material
weaknesses, or if PCT identifies additional material weaknesses in the future or otherwise fails to maintain an effective system of internal
controls, PCT may not be able to accurately or timely report its financial condition or results of operations, which may adversely affect
PCT’s business and stock price.
In
connection with the preparation of PCT’s consolidated financial statements as of and for the three months ended March 31, 2021 and
June 30, 2021 and the years ended December 31, 2020, and 2019, certain material weaknesses were identified in PCT’s internal control
over financial reporting. A material weakness is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting
such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of PCT’s interim or annual consolidated financial statements
will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. The material weaknesses were as follows:
•PCT
did not have sufficient, qualified personnel to determine the appropriate accounting treatment for its complex agreements or transactions
that required technical accounting analysis;
•PCT’s
lack of sufficient personnel also resulted in inadequate segregation of duties in the design and operation of the internal controls over
financial reporting;
•PCT’s
lack of formal processes and controls resulted in an ineffective control environment, which led to an inadequate review of the financial
statements and financial reporting;
•PCT
did not design and maintain effective controls over certain information technology (“IT”) controls for information systems
that are relevant to the preparation of its financial statements, specifically with respect to user access, to ensure appropriate segregation
of duties that adequately restrict user access to financial applications, programs, and data to appropriate company personnel; and
•PCT
did not design and maintain effective controls surrounding the completeness and cutoff of expenses and payables, such that certain expenses
paid by a related entity on behalf of PCT were not appropriately allocated to PCT, and certain transactions were recorded in the period
when the invoice was received rather than accrued in the period when the activity took place.
These
material weaknesses could result in a misstatement of substantially all of PCT’s accounts or disclosures, which would result in
a material misstatement to the interim or annual consolidated financial statements that would not be prevented or detected. PCT has commenced
measures to remediate the identified material weaknesses. These measures include adding qualified personnel, with public company and internal
control experience, as well as implementing new financial processes and procedures. PCT intends to continue to take steps to remediate
the material weaknesses described above and further develop its accounting processes, controls, and reviews. PCT
plans
to continue to assess its internal controls and procedures and intends to take further action as necessary or appropriate to address any
other matters it identifies or are brought to its attention. PCT will not be able to fully remediate these material weaknesses until these
steps have been completed and have been operating effectively for a sufficient period of time.
PCT
cannot assure you that the measures it has taken to date and may take in the future will be sufficient to remediate the control deficiencies
that led to PCT’s material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting or that PCT will prevent or avoid potential future
material weaknesses. The effectiveness of PCT’s internal control over financial reporting is subject to various inherent limitations,
including cost limitations, judgments used in decision making, assumptions about the likelihood of future events, the possibility of human
error and the risk of fraud. If PCT is unable to remediate the material weaknesses, its ability to record, process and report financial
information accurately, and to prepare financial statements within the time periods specified by the forms of the SEC, could be adversely
affected which, in turn, may adversely affect PCT’s reputation and business and the market price of the Company’s common stock.
In
addition, any such failures could result in litigation or regulatory actions by the SEC or other regulatory authorities, loss of investor
confidence, delisting of PCT’s securities and harm to PCT’s reputation and financial condition, or diversion of financial
and management resources from the operation of PCT’s business.
PCT
will incur significant increased expenses and administrative burdens as a public company, which could have an adverse effect on its business,
financial condition and results of operations.
PCT
will face increased legal, accounting, administrative and other costs and expenses as a public company that PCT did not incur as a private
company. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the “Sarbanes-Oxley Act”), including the requirements of Section 404, as well as
rules and regulations subsequently implemented by the SEC, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 and the
rules and regulations promulgated and to be promulgated thereunder, the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and
the securities exchanges, impose additional reporting and other obligations on public companies. Compliance with public company requirements
will increase costs and make certain activities more time-consuming. A number of those requirements will require PCT to carry out activities
PCT has not done previously. For example, PCT created new board committees and adopted new internal controls and disclosure controls and
procedures. In addition, additional expenses associated with SEC reporting requirements will be incurred. Furthermore, if any issues in
complying with those requirements are identified (for example, if the auditors identify material weaknesses in addition to those disclosed
herein or a significant deficiency in the internal control over financial reporting), PCT could incur additional costs rectifying those
issues, and the existence of those issues could adversely affect PCT’s reputation or investor perceptions of it. It may also be
more expensive to obtain director and officer liability insurance in such a situation. Risks associated with PCT’s status as a public
company may make it more difficult to attract and retain qualified persons to serve on the board of directors or as executive officers.
The additional reporting and other obligations imposed by these rules and regulations will increase legal and financial compliance costs
and the costs of related legal, accounting and administrative activities. These increased costs will require PCT to divert a significant
amount of money that could otherwise be used to expand the business and achieve strategic objectives. Advocacy efforts by stockholders
and third parties may also prompt additional changes in governance and reporting requirements, which could further increase costs.
As
a result of recent SEC guidance, certain of PCT’s Company Warrants are presented as liabilities with subsequent fair value remeasurement,
which may have an adverse effect on the market price of PCT’s common stock.
PCT has 199,125 warrants
that were previously issued by ROCH in private placements that occurred concurrently with ROCH’s initial public offering before
being converted into Company warrants pursuant to the Business Combination (the “private warrants”). These private warrants
are exercisable for cash or on a cashless basis, at the holder’s option, and are non-redeemable so long as they are held by the
initial purchasers or their permitted transferees. If the private warrants are held by someone other than the initial purchasers or their
permitted transferees, the private warrants will be redeemable by PCT and exercisable by such holders on the same basis as the warrants
included in the units sold in ROCH’s initial public offering, in which case the 199,125 private warrants could be redeemed by PCT
for $2.0 million. Under U.S. GAAP, PCT is required to evaluate contingent exercise provisions of these warrants and then their settlement
provisions to determine whether they should be accounted for as a warrant liability or as equity. Any settlement amount dependent upon
the characteristics of the holder precludes these warrants from being considered indexed to PCT’s common stock, and therefore, from
being accounted for as
equity. As a result of
the provision that the private warrants, when held by the initial purchaser or a permitted transferee, cannot be redeemed by PCT and are
exercisable on a cashless basis at the holder’s option, the requirements for accounting for these warrants as equity are not satisfied.
Therefore, PCT will account for these private warrants as a warrant liability and record (a) that liability at fair value, and (b) any
subsequent changes in fair value as of the end of each period for which earnings are reported. The impact of changes in fair value on
earnings may have an adverse effect on the market price of PCT’s common stock.
PCT’s
failure to timely and effectively implement controls and procedures required by Section 404(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act that will be
applicable to it after the Business Combination is consummated could negatively impact its business.
PCT
was not previously subject to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. However, following the consummation of the Business Combination,
PCT is required to provide management’s attestation on internal controls. The standards required for a public company under Section
404(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act are significantly more stringent than those previously required of PCT as a privately held company. Management
may not be able to effectively and timely implement controls and procedures that adequately respond to the increased regulatory compliance
and reporting requirements that will be applicable after the Business Combination. If PCT is not able to implement the additional requirements
of Section 404(a) in a timely manner or with adequate compliance, it may not be able to assess whether its internal controls over financial
reporting are effective, which may subject it to adverse regulatory consequences and could harm investor confidence and the market price
of its securities.
ITEM
2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
None.
ITEM
3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
None.
ITEM
4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not
applicable.
ITEM
5. OTHER INFORMATION
None.
ITEM
6. EXHIBITS
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
Number |
Description
of Exhibit |
2.1 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
|
10.4 |
|
|
|
10.5 |
|
|
|
10.6 |
|
|
|
10.7 |
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
|
|
32.1 |
|
|
|
32.2 |
|
|
|
101.1 |
The
following financial statements from PureCycle Technologies, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
June 30, 2021, formatted in Inline XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): |
|
(i)
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020. |
|
(ii)
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2021 and 2020. |
|
(iii)
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Stockholder’s Equity for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2021 and 2020. |
|
(iv)
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2021 and 2020. |
|
(v)
Notes to the Interim Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements |
|
|
104.1 |
Cover
Page Interactive Data File (formatted in Inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101) |
(1) Previously
filed as an exhibit to Roth CH Acquisition I Co. Parent Corp.’s Registration Statement on Form S-4, as amended (File No. 333-250847).
(2) Previously
filed as an exhibit to PureCycle Technologies, Inc.’s (formerly known as Roth CH Acquisition I Co. Parent Corp.’s) Registration
Statement on Form S-1, as amended (File No. 333-251034).
(3) Previously
filed as an exhibit to PureCycle Technologies, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 14, 2021.
(4) Previously
filed as an exhibit to PureCycle Technologies, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 14, 2021.
* Filed
herewith.
† Schedules
have been omitted pursuant to Item 601(a)(5) of Regulation S-K. The registrant hereby undertakes to furnish copies of any of the omitted
schedules upon request by the Securities and Exchange Commission.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
duly authorized.
PURECYCLE TECHNOLOGIES
INC.
(Registrant)
By: ___/s/
Michael Otworth_________________
Michael Otworth
Chief Executive Officer
(Principle Executive Officer)
By: ___/s/
Michael Dee_____________________
Michael Dee
Chief Financial Officer
(Principle Financial Officer)
Date: August 12,
2021
PURECYCLE
TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
NOTICE
OF GRANT OF RESTRICTED STOCK UNITS
(Non-Employee
Directors)
PureCycle
Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”)
hereby grants to the Participant the number of Restricted Stock Units (“RSUs”)
set forth below under the PureCycle Technologies, Inc. 2021
Equity and
Incentive Compensation Plan (the “Plan”).
The RSUs are
subject to all of the terms and conditions in this Notice of Grant of Restricted Stock Units (this “Grant
Notice”),
in the Restricted Stock Units Agreement attached hereto (the “Agreement”)
and in the Plan. Capitalized terms used, but not otherwise defined, in this Grant Notice will have the meanings given to such terms in
the Plan, and the Plan and the Agreement are hereby incorporated by reference into this Grant Notice. If there are any inconsistences
between this Grant Notice or the Agreement and the Plan, the terms of the Plan shall govern.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Participant: |
[Name] |
Type
of Grant: |
Restricted
Stock Units |
Date
of Grant: |
[Grant
Date] |
Number
of RSUs: |
[#] |
Vesting
Schedule: |
Subject
to the conditions set forth in the Agreement, including but not limited to the Participant’s continuous service as a Director until
the applicable vesting date, the RSUs shall become vested in full on the date that is the earlier of (a) the one-year anniversary of the
Date of Grant and (b) the date of the Company’s regular annual meeting of stockholders which occurs in the calendar year following
the calendar year in which the Date of Grant occurs. |
PURECYCLE
TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Restricted
Stock Units Agreement
PureCycle
Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”)
has granted, pursuant to the PureCycle Technologies, Inc. 2021 Equity and Incentive Compensation Plan (the “Plan”),
to the Participant named in the Notice of Grant of Restricted Stock Units (the “Grant
Notice”)
to which this Restricted Stock Units Agreement is attached (together with the Grant Notice, this “Agreement”)
an award of Restricted Stock Units as set forth in such Grant Notice, subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement.
1.Certain
Definitions.
Capitalized terms used, but not otherwise defined, in this Agreement will have the meanings given to such terms in the Plan.
2.Grant
of RSUs. Subject
to and upon the terms, conditions and restrictions set forth in this Agreement and in the Plan, the Company has granted to the Participant,
as of the Date of Grant, the number of
RSUs set forth
in the Grant Notice. Each RSU shall represent the right of the Participant to receive one share of Common Stock subject to and upon the
terms and conditions of this Agreement.
3.Restrictions
on Transfer of RSUs.
Subject to Section 15 of the Plan, neither the RSUs evidenced hereby nor any interest therein or in the shares of Common Stock underlying
such RSUs shall be transferable prior to payment to the Participant pursuant to Section
5 hereof other
than by will or pursuant to the laws of descent and distribution.
4.Vesting
of RSUs.
(a)The
RSUs shall vest in accordance with the Vesting Schedule set forth in the Grant Notice (the period from the Date of Grant until the applicable
vesting date, the “Vesting
Period”).
Any RSUs that do not so become vested will be forfeited, including, except as provided in Section
4(b) or Section
4(c) below,
if the Participant ceases to serve as a Director for any reason prior to the end of the Vesting Period.
(b)Notwithstanding
Section
4(a) above,
the RSUs shall become vested in full and payable to the Participant pursuant to Section
5 hereof upon
the date that the Participant ceases to be a Director by reason of the Participant’s death or the Participant becomes Disabled.
For purposes of this Agreement, “Disability”
(or similar terms) shall mean a circumstance in which the Participant is unable to engage in any substantial gainful activity by reason
of any medically determinable physical or mental impairment which can be expected to result in death or which has lasted or can be expected
to last for a continuous period of not less than 12 months and otherwise satisfies the requirements to be disabled under Section 409A
of the Code.
(c)Notwithstanding
Section
4(a) above,
in the event of a Change in Control that occurs prior to the end of the Vesting Period, the RSUs shall become vested in full and payable
to the Participant pursuant to Section
5 hereof upon
the consummation of such Change in Control.
5.Form
and Time of Payment of RSUs.
(a)Payment
for the RSUs, after and to the extent they have become vested and nonforfeitable, shall be made in the form of shares of Common Stock.
Payment shall be made as soon as administratively practicable following (but no later than thirty (30) days following) the date that the
RSUs become vested pursuant to Section
4 hereof.
(b)Except
to the extent provided by Section 409A of the Code and permitted by the Board or the Committee, no shares of Common Stock may be issued
to the Participant at a time earlier than otherwise expressly provided in this Agreement.
(c)The
Company’s obligations to the Participant with respect to the RSUs will be satisfied in full upon the issuance of shares of Common
Stock corresponding to such RSUs.
6.Dividend
Equivalents; Voting and Other Rights.
(a)The
Participant shall have no rights of ownership in the shares of Common Stock underlying the RSUs and no right to vote the shares of Common
Stock underlying the RSUs until the date on which the shares of Common Stock underlying the RSUs are issued or transferred to the Participant
pursuant to Section
5 above.
(b)From
and after the Date of Grant and until the earlier of (i) the time when the RSUs become vested and are paid in accordance with Section
5 hereof and
(ii) the time when the Participant’s right to receive shares of Common Stock in payment of the RSUs is forfeited in accordance with
Section
4 hereof,
on the date that the Company pays a cash dividend (if any) to holders of shares of Common Stock generally, the Participant shall be credited
with cash per RSU equal to the amount of such dividend. Any amounts credited pursuant to the immediately preceding sentence shall be subject
to the same applicable terms and conditions (including vesting, payment and forfeitability) as apply to the RSUs based on which the dividend
equivalents were credited, and such amounts shall be paid in cash at the same time as the RSUs to which they relate are settled.
(c)The
obligation of the Company under this Agreement will be merely that of an unfunded and unsecured promise of the Company to deliver shares
of Common Stock in the future, and the rights of the Participant will be no greater than that of an unsecured general creditor. No assets
of the Company will be held or set aside as security for the obligations of the Company under this Agreement.
7.Adjustments.
The number of shares of Common Stock issuable for each RSU and the other terms and conditions of the grant evidenced by this Agreement
are subject to mandatory adjustment, including as provided in Section 11 of the Plan.
8.Taxes.
The Participant will be solely responsible for the payment of all taxes that arise with respect to the granting and payment of the RSUs,
including the payment of any shares of Common Stock.
9.Compliance
with Law.
(a)The
Company shall make reasonable efforts to comply with all applicable federal and state securities laws; provided,
however,
that notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan and this Agreement, the Company shall not be obligated to issue any shares of Common
Stock pursuant to this Agreement if the issuance thereof would result in a violation of any such law.
(b)Notwithstanding
anything in this Agreement to the contrary, nothing in this Agreement prevents the Participant from providing, without prior notice to
the Company, information to governmental authorities regarding possible legal violations or otherwise testifying or participating in any
investigation or proceeding by any governmental authorities regarding possible legal violations, and for purpose of clarity the Participant
is not prohibited from providing information voluntarily to the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 21F of the Exchange
Act.
10.Compliance
With Section 409A of the Code.
To the extent applicable, it is intended that this Agreement and the Plan comply with or be exempt from the provisions of Section 409A
of the Code. This Agreement and the Plan shall be administered in a manner consistent with this intent, and any provision that would cause
this Agreement or the Plan to fail to satisfy Section 409A of the Code shall have no force or effect until amended to comply with Section
409A of the Code (which amendment may be retroactive to the extent permitted by Section 409A of the Code and may be made by the Company
without the consent of the Participant). Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Company is not guaranteeing any particular tax outcome, and
the Participant shall remain solely liable for any and all tax consequences associated with the RSUs.
11.Interpretation.
Any reference in this Agreement to Section 409A of the Code will also include any proposed, temporary or final regulations, or any other
guidance, promulgated with respect to such Section by the U.S. Department of the Treasury or the Internal Revenue Service.
12.No
Right to Future Awards or Continued Service as a Director.
The grant
of the RSUs under this Agreement to the Participant is a voluntary, discretionary award being made on a one-time basis and it does not
constitute a commitment to make any future awards. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall confer upon the Participant any right to
continued service as a Director.
13.Relation
to Other Benefits.
Any economic or other benefit to the Participant under this Agreement or the Plan shall not be taken into account in determining any benefits
to which the Participant may be entitled under any other compensatory arrangement maintained by the Company or any of its Subsidiaries.
14.Amendments.
Any amendment to the Plan shall be deemed to be an amendment to this Agreement to the extent that the amendment is applicable hereto;
provided,
however,
that no amendment shall adversely affect the Participant’s rights with respect to the RSUs without the Participant’s written
consent, and the Participant’s consent shall not be required to an amendment that is deemed necessary by the Company to ensure compliance
with Section 409A of the Code or Section 10D of the Exchange Act.
15.Severability.
In the event that one or more of the provisions of this Agreement shall be invalidated for any reason by a court of competent jurisdiction,
any provision so invalidated shall be deemed to be separable from the other provisions hereof, and the remaining provisions hereof shall
continue to be valid and fully enforceable.
16.Relation
to Plan. The
RSUs granted under this Agreement and all of the terms and conditions hereof are subject to all of the terms and conditions of the Plan.
In the event of any inconsistency between this Agreement and the Plan, the terms of the Plan will govern. The Committee acting pursuant
to the Plan, as constituted from time to time, shall, except as expressly provided otherwise herein or in the Plan, have the right to
determine any questions which arise in connection with this Agreement.
17.Electronic
Delivery.
The Company may, in its sole discretion, deliver any documents related to the RSUs and the Participant’s participation in the Plan,
or future awards that may be granted under the Plan, by electronic means or request the Participant’s consent to participate in
the Plan by electronic means. The Participant hereby consents to receive such documents by electronic delivery and, if requested, agrees
to participate in the Plan through an on-line or electronic system established and maintained by the Company or another third party designated
by the Company.
18.Governing
Law.
This Agreement shall be governed by and construed with the internal substantive laws of the State of Delaware, without giving effect to
any principle of law that would result in the application of the law of any other jurisdiction.
19.Successors
and Assigns.
Without limiting Section
3 hereof,
the provisions of this Agreement shall inure to the benefit of, and be binding upon, the successors, administrators, heirs, legal representatives
and assigns of the Participant, and the successors and assigns of the Company.
20.Acknowledgement.
The Participant acknowledges that the Participant (a) has received a copy of the Plan, (b) has had an opportunity to review the terms
of this Agreement and the Plan, (c) understands the terms and conditions of this Agreement and the Plan and (d) agrees to such terms and
conditions.
21.Counterparts.
This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original but all of which together
will constitute one and the same agreement.
IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Agreement on the day and year indicated below.
PURECYCLE
TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
By:
Name:
Title:
Date:
Participant
Acknowledgment and Acceptance
By:
Print
Name:
Date:
CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
I,
Michael Otworth, certify that:
1.I
have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of PureCycle Technologies, Inc.;
2.Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered
by this report;
3.Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
(a)Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b)[Reserved];
(c)Evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and
(d)Disclosed
in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected,
or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5.The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent functions):
(a)All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b)Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal
control over financial reporting.
Date: August 12,
2021
By:
/s/ Michael Otworth
Michael Otworth
Chief Executive
Officer
(Principal
Executive Officer)
CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
I,
Michael Dee, certify that:
1.I
have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of PureCycle Technologies, Inc.;
2.Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered
by this report;
3.Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
(a)Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b)[Reserved];
(c)Evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and
(d)Disclosed
in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected,
or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5.The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent functions):
(a)All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b)Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal
control over financial reporting.
Date: August 12,
2021
By:
/s/ Michael Dee
Michael Dee
Chief Financial
Officer
(Principal
Financial Officer)
CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In
connection with the Quarterly Report of PureCycle Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30,
2021 (the “Report”), Michael Otworth, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies, to the best of his knowledge, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
(1)The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
Date: August 12,
2021
By:
/s/ Michael Otworth
Michael Otworth
Chief Executive
Officer
(Principal
Executive Officer)
CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In
connection with the Quarterly Report of PureCycle Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30,
2021 (the “Report”), Michael Dee, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies, to the best of his knowledge, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
(1)The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operatiosns of the
Company.
Date: August 12,
2021
By:
/s/ Michael Dee
Michael Dee
Chief Financial
Officer
(Principal
Financial Officer)